Profiling Clinical Researchers Effectively using Embeddings and Clustering

Anika Sharma; Maxim Edelson; Tsung-Ting Kuo

doi:10.1101/2024.01.16.24300807

Abstract

Effective researcher profiling is key to support rapid research team formation. We developed a profiling method using (1) widely accessible publication titles, (2) document embedding vector representations to consider background, and (3) both general and specific types of datasets. Our results showed that the most similar researchers have cosine similarities of 0.287/0.258. Our preliminary results can support biomedical informaticians to expedite collaborative clinical studies, enhance research quality, and eventually improve patient healthcare outcomes.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The authors AS, ME, and T-TK were funded by the U.S. NIH (R00HG009680, R01EB031030, R01GM118609, R01HG011066, R01HL136835, RM1HG011558, T15LM011271, U24LM013755, and U54HG012510). The content is solely the responsibility of the author and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes