Abstract
Objective Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a common respiratory pathogen not only in children, but also in adults. Country-specific data on the epidemiology and burden of disease are essential for policy decisions. In view of a recent authorization of adult RSV vaccines, we aimed to comprehensively collect and assess evidence on the epidemiology and burden of RSV in Italian adults.
Methods A systematic literature review was conducted according to the available guidelines. Random-effects proportional meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled estimates and the observed heterogeneity was investigated by using both subgroup and meta-regression analyses.
Results A total of 35 studies were identified. RSV seasonal attack rates ranged from 0.8 ‰ in community-dwelling older adults to 10.9% in hematological outpatients. On average, 4.5% (95% CI: 3.2–5.9%) of respiratory samples tested positive for RSV. This positivity prevalence was higher in older adults (4.4%; 95% CI: 2.8– 6.3%) than in working-age adults (3.5%; 95% CI: 2.5–4.6%) and in outpatient (4.9%; 95% CI: 3.1–7.0%) than inpatient (2.9%; 95% CI: 1.5–4.8%) settings. Study location and sample size were also significant predictors of RSV detection frequency. The pooled estimate of in-hospital mortality was as high as 7.2% (95% CI: 4.7– 10.3%). However, other important indicators of the diseases burden, such as complication and hospitalization rates, are missing.
Conclusion RSV poses a measurable burden on Italian adults, especially those of older age and with some co-morbidities. Policy makers should give priority to health technology assessment of the novel RSV vaccines.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes