Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to identify research methods and evidence pertaining to the relationship of interprofessional acute care teams and hospital characteristics on patient outcomes in hospital-based acute care.
Methods A review was completed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. The search strategy was executed across PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase. The review included 12 systematic reviews from 2012 to 2023 that examine the impact of acute care staffing characteristics on patient outcomes.
Results Workforce characteristics primarily focused on nurse staffing, with a limited number of studies assessing the impact of interprofessional teams or non-clinical workers on care quality. There is limited data describing the context of care delivery via potential relationships between hospital characteristics, interprofessional team staffing levels, and patient outcomes.
Conclusions To promote comparability across studies, future workforce research should include a comprehensive analytic approach that includes clearly defined variables representing interprofessional care teams, community factors, and staffing and patient characteristics.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The study was funded by the Washington State Department of Health through a contract (HED26380) with the University of Washington’s School of Nursing. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Washington State Department of Health or the University of Washington. This work was also supported, in part, by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Nursing Research Training Program in Global Health Nursing at the University of Washington (T32 NR019761).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, all necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained, all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms archived.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Abbreviations
- SDOH
- Social determinants of health RN: Registered nurse
- PRISMA-ScR
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis
- PICOS
- Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Study type
- MeSH
- Medical Subject Heading
- CINAHL
- Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature
- NPR
- Nurse-to-patient ratio
- NHPPD
- Nurse Hours Per Patient Day
- NAS
- Nursing Activities Score
- TISS
- Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System
