Follow this preprint
Comparative Analysis of Three Surveys on Primary Care Providers’ Experiences with Interoperability and Electronic Health Records
View ORCID ProfileNathaniel Hendrix, Natalya Maisel, Jordan Everson, Vaishali Patel, Andrew Bazemore, Lisa S. Rotenstein, A Jay Holmgren, Alex H. Krist, Julia Adler-Milstein, Robert L. Phillips
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.02.24300713
This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
Nathaniel Hendrix
1American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY
2Center for Professionalism and Value in Health Care, Washington, DC
PharmD, PhDNatalya Maisel
3University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
PhDJordan Everson
4Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC
PhD, MPPVaishali Patel
4Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC
PhD, MPHAndrew Bazemore
1American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY
2Center for Professionalism and Value in Health Care, Washington, DC
MD, MPHLisa S. Rotenstein
3University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
MDA Jay Holmgren
3University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
PhDAlex H. Krist
5Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
MD, MPHJulia Adler-Milstein
3University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
PhDRobert L. Phillips
1American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY
2Center for Professionalism and Value in Health Care, Washington, DC
MD, MSPH
Posted January 03, 2024.
Comparative Analysis of Three Surveys on Primary Care Providers’ Experiences with Interoperability and Electronic Health Records
Nathaniel Hendrix, Natalya Maisel, Jordan Everson, Vaishali Patel, Andrew Bazemore, Lisa S. Rotenstein, A Jay Holmgren, Alex H. Krist, Julia Adler-Milstein, Robert L. Phillips
medRxiv 2024.01.02.24300713; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.02.24300713
This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
Subject Area
Subject Areas
- Addiction Medicine (405)
- Allergy and Immunology (718)
- Anesthesia (210)
- Cardiovascular Medicine (3002)
- Dermatology (256)
- Emergency Medicine (449)
- Epidemiology (12900)
- Forensic Medicine (12)
- Gastroenterology (840)
- Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4698)
- Geriatric Medicine (432)
- Health Economics (742)
- Health Informatics (2986)
- Health Policy (1081)
- Hematology (399)
- HIV/AIDS (942)
- Medical Education (439)
- Medical Ethics (116)
- Nephrology (481)
- Neurology (4486)
- Nursing (239)
- Nutrition (657)
- Oncology (2329)
- Ophthalmology (659)
- Orthopedics (262)
- Otolaryngology (330)
- Pain Medicine (290)
- Palliative Medicine (85)
- Pathology (506)
- Pediatrics (1218)
- Primary Care Research (509)
- Public and Global Health (7073)
- Radiology and Imaging (1570)
- Respiratory Medicine (933)
- Rheumatology (454)
- Sports Medicine (390)
- Surgery (497)
- Toxicology (62)
- Transplantation (214)
- Urology (187)