Abstract
Study Rationale Health Authorities expect physicians to behave professionally with serious lapses in conduct that adversely impact the patients, the public and the profession.
Objectives To explore the behavior and attitude towards complex, real-life situations met in the workplace in a sample of Iraqi doctors .The question was, is there any difference in the score between rotator doctors and senior resident doctors?
Methods A cross sectional study conducted for rotators and senior residents selected randomly and the questionnaire was via face to face interview.. The questionnaire contains 10 Case Scenarios taken from the UK foundation program, medical school council 2012. Each question has eight choices, and only three choices must be answered. Each correct choice is given 4 marks and the maximum mark for each question is 12, the wrong answer does not cancel the correct answer. Analysis was done using SPSS 25.0
Results A sample of 125 individuals participated in this study in which 51% are males while 49% are females, and 48% of them are rotators and 52% are senior residents. The priority of patient care had the highest mean score of 7.26 out of 12 while “Communication skills” had a lower mean score of 3.74. Females tended to score higher in “Conflicts between professional and personal concerns” than males, with a mean score of 4.98 compared to 3.69.Rotators have a mean score of 57.6 out of 120 compared to 53.6 for senior residents (p = 0.048).
Conclusion This study tried to explore behavior and attitude toward complex and real time situations in work place. Mean score of conflicts between professional and personal concerns was higher for females. On the other hand regarding training level, there were two items significantly different, namely conflicts between personal and professional concerns and ensuring patient safety. Communication skills had low score for both genders and training level.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Ethical Committee of the Department of community medicine, college of Medicine,University of Baghdad gave the ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
