Abstract
Background Limited research exists regarding the impact of neuroimaging modality on endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) decisions for late window large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke cases.
Purpose This study assesses whether perfusion CT imaging: 1) alters the proportion of recommendations for EVT, and 2) enhances the reliability of EVT decision-making compared to non-contrast CT and CT angiography.
Materials and Methods We conducted an online survey using 30 patients drawn from an institutional database of 3144 acute stroke cranial CT scans. These cases were presented to 29 stroke or neurointerventional physicians from Canada across two sessions. Physicians evaluated each patient both with and without perfusion imaging and gave EVT recommendations. We used non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals and difference in agreement classification as criteria to suggest a difference between the Gwet AC1 statistics (κG). Our outcomes were: 1) the proportion of EVT recommendations, and 2) interrater and intrarater agreement, with or without perfusion imaging.
Results In the first round, 29 raters completed the assessment, with 28 finishing the second round. The percentage of EVT recommendations differed by 1.1% with or without perfusion imaging. However, individual decisions changed in 21.4% of cases, with 11.3% against EVT and 10.1% in favor. Interrater agreement (κG) among the 29 raters was similar between non-perfusion CT neuroimaging and perfusion CT neuroimaging (κG = 0.487; 95% CI 0.327, 0.647 and κG = 0.552; 95% CI 0.430, 0.675). The 95% CIs overlapped with moderate agreement in both. Intrarater agreement exhibited overlapping 95% CIs for all 28 raters. κG was either substantial or excellent (0.81-1) for 71.4% (20/28) of raters in both groups.
Conclusion The difference in EVT recommendations is minimal with either neuroimaing protocol. Regarding agreement we found that use of automated CT perfusion images does not significantly impact the reliability of EVT decisions for late window LVO patients.
Competing Interest Statement
JBD: Honoraria from Medtronic. Travel grant from Microvention; MAM: Member of the scientific advisory board of Palmera Medical; TRM: Principal of eVasc Neurovascular;
Funding Statement
JBD is a recipient of the Fergus Mills Scholarship of McMaster University for the Clinical Uncertainty in Large Vessel Occlusion (CULVO) study.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the research ethics board of Unity Health- St. Michael's Hospital (SMH REB# 22-186).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The full data is available upon reasonable request from the authors.
Abbreviations
- CTA
- Computed tomography angiography
- NCCT
- Non-contrast cranial CT
- EVT
- Endovascular thrombectomy
- LVO
- large vessel occlusion
- ASPECTS
- Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score
