ABSTRACT
Purpose We aimed to explore the factors that affect physiotherapists’ use of AE during stroke rehabilitation for people with stroke.
Material and methods We conducted a qualitative descriptive study using thematic analysis informed by a pragmatic worldview. Physiotherapists attended one on one semi-structured interviews to answer some general questions about aerobic exercise and then discussed the charts of their 4 most recently discharged patients. Both deductive and inductive coding were used for analysis.
Results Ten physiotherapists participated. Healthcare policies and limited resources were mostly discussed in general questions while specific profiles of patients with stroke, their goals and preferences were mostly discussed in patient specific questions. Three themes were identified:1) physiotherapists’ perspectives and practices around aerobic exercise; 2) profiles of people with stroke, as well as their goals and their exercise modality preferences; and 3) influence of health system priorities, rehabilitation intensity policy, and resources.
Conclusions Physiotherapists’ behaviours regarding use of aerobic exercise for people with stroke are not a binary behaviour of prescribing or not prescribing aerobic exercise. Their behaviours are better understood on a continuum; between two ends of not prescribing aerobic exercise, and prescribing aerobic exercise with defined intensity, duration, and frequency.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR PJT-148906 & PJT-173472).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Research Ethics Board of the University Health Network gave ethical approval for this work (protocol number: 20-5695). The Research Ethics Board of Sunnybrook Research Institute gave ethical approval for this work (protocol number: 3605). The Research Ethics Board of Hamilton Health Sciences gave ethical approval for this work (protocol number: 11523)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Raw data are not available.