Healthcare Cost Literacy: Exploration of Concept and Initial Development of a Novel Tool in a Representative U.S. Adult Population

Background

Health literacy (HL) has long been recognized as a critical determinant of health outcomes and healthcare utilization and decision-making across different population groups^1–3. HL is defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as “the ability to find, understand, and use information and services to inform health-related decisions and actions for themselves and others”^4,5. And over the last few decades, researchers and practitioners have increasingly focused on strategies to enhance HL among individuals and communities^6–8.

The escalating costs of healthcare have recently emerged as a major challenge resulting in individuals and families being unable to bear the financial burden of medical expenses^9–11. Consequently, there is a growing need for understanding and addressing the issue of healthcare cost literacy (HCL). While there is emergent data estimating the prevalence of health literacy and financial burden from healthcare, little is known about the prevalence of and factors determining HCL and its relationship with conventionally assessed HL. Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive survey targeting a representative sample of American adults to help devise a novel definition of HCL, to develop a tool to help assess the prevalence of HCL, and to estimate the relationship between HL and HCL across various sociodemographic and health-related variables. The goal of this research is to present an overview of the initial development of the HCL tool and discuss how it might be applied in different research settings to understand literacy around the costs of healthcare.

Methods

The data for this study was collected in partnership with YouGov (www.YouGov.com), an online survey platform tool which comprises a proprietary panel of opt-in participants. The sample of participants for YouGov studies are recruited through different methods, including online advertising and email invitations. Panelists have previously given consent to be contacted periodically for participation in surveys. Incentives are provided for participants in the form of YouGov points, which can be redeemed for gift cards and other rewards. The sample for this study is nationally representative and weighted on age, gender, race/ethnicity, political affiliation, educational attainment, and region. The weights are generated using raking (or “iterative proportional fitting”) to match the target demographics, in this case the U.S. adult population.

We measured participants’ HL using the validated 12-point HLSQ-12 scale initially developed by Finbråten et al¹². The HLS-Q12 is a short version of the 47-item European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire and encompasses both cognitive domains (ability to access, understand, appraise, and apply health information) and health domains (knowledge of health care, disease prevention, and health promotion). Questions are asked on a scale of 1 (“very difficult”) to 4 (“very easy”); a higher score indicates higher HL proficiencies. The total number of points on the HLSQ-12 could possibly range from 12 (answering “very difficult” for all of the questions) to 48 points (answering “very easy” to all 12 questions)¹².

We adapted the CDC definition of HL and defined HCL as “the ability to find, understand and use information and services related to healthcare costs, enabling individuals to make informed decisions about their healthcare expenditure.” To estimate levels of HCL, we asked participants a series of questions related to their understanding of various costs associated with medical care – from knowledge about cost-differences in generic versus brand drugs to knowledge about hospital chargemasters and bill contesting, to confidence in being able to estimate healthcare bills prior to receiving services. We asked 12 HCL questions on a scale of 1 (“very difficult”) to 4 (“very easy”), which aligns with the scale provided in the HLSQ-12 instrument. Participants were asked a range of questions around HCL that spanned several conceptual domains including knowledge about costs of healthcare procedures, visits, and medications, and knowledge about various components of health insurance. Three additional questions related to HCL presented binary yes or no answer choices (“Did you know that different pharmacies may charge different prices for the same drug?”, “Did you know that the hospital chargemaster exists and can be requested/reviewed?”, and “Do you know how to contest a hospital bill?”).

HCL was analyzed in several different ways: as individual questions, as a continuous measure (by taking the average score on all 12 questions scored on 1-4 point Likert scale), and with a binary categorization (median split using summed score of HCL questions with 1-4 point Likert scale).

Missing data in the HCL Likert scale questions (12 total) and HLSQ-12 were partially imputed. If a participant responded to 75% or more of the questions in the HLSQ-12 or in the series of 12 HCL questions, we imputed any missing questions using the mean score of the answered questions. For participants who missed more than 25% of the questions, their scores on HL and/or HCL were coded as “Not Applicable” (N=89, or 6.0%, dropped for HLSQ-12, N=202, or 13.5%, dropped for HCL). HL and HCL were evaluated as covariates subsequent analyses using an individual’s mean response score across all 12 questions in each scale; thus, each respondent with 75% response rate for the HLSQ-12 has a mean HL score, and each respondent with at least 75% response rate across the HCL has a mean HCL score.

Participants also completed a five-item “assessment” of health insurance terms, which is adapted from survey(s) administered by the Understanding America Study, which is maintained by the Center for Economic and Social Research (CESR) at the University of Southern California¹³. We performed a bivariate analysis of the sum of correct answers on this assessment (scoring “Don’t know/NA” and incorrect responses as 0 and correct responses as 1 alongside other participant characteristics.

We performed an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) on the HL and HCL survey items to evaluate potential theoretical constructs underpinning the questions. EFA is employed in survey construction work to assess the underlying constructs (“factors”) of a dataset; these construct determinations are determined using inter-variable correlation metrics¹⁴. Typically, when an EFA is run on a dataset, a certain number of constructs are extracted and each variable is assigned to one of the constructs; from there, a researcher can qualitatively evaluate how each construct ties a certain group of variables together. For the EFA, only participants with full data were included; any participant missing any one variable included in the EFA was excluded. Sample sizes for complete cases were N=1,029 (HL), N=967 (HCL), and N=787 (HL and HCL combined). We performed separate EFAs on the HLSQ-12, the 12 HCL items, and the 24 HL and HCL items together. For all EFAs, we implemented a parallel analysis approach¹⁴, followed by EFA using oblique rotation and ordinary least squares specifying varying number of factors. All analyses were performed using R Version 4.3.1. The Advarra IRB determined that this research project was exempt from IRB oversight.

Results

A total of 1500 complete survey responses were collected (median age 47, 51.4% female, 62.8% white). Sample weights were provided by the vendor (YouGov) using a sampling frame based upon the 2019 American Community Survey (ACS) data, and matching to age, gender, race/ethnicity, political affiliation, educational attainment, and region. Population characteristics (raw and weighted) of the sample are presented in Table 1.

Discussion

Limited research has been done to assess current population-level understanding of the costs associated with medical care. In this study, we introduce HCL as a potential new mechanism for assessing individuals’ literacy on the costs associated with healthcare. We also assess how HL is associated with HCL and make distinctions between the two related, but unique, concepts. An understanding of Americans’ levels of HCL will help policymakers and actors in the healthcare system develop targeted plans to educate consumers on financial planning and evaluation in the healthcare system.

An EFA revealed four distinct underlying variables making up the HCL components we assessed. This potentially suggests several themes that researchers can use in future work in the areas of health insurance terminology awareness, healthcare cost planning, and insurance selection/planning. When HL and HCL Likert questions were grouped together, 5-factors were suggested to be optimal; conceptually, the 4-factor scale may be more consistent with the question groupings. Further research in this field should explore factor determinations on larger and/or more diverse samples to validate or provide additional guidance on these findings.

The four-item “assessment” given to participants centered on the HCL-related concept of health insurance revealed distinct differences across certain groups. People who had more interactions with the healthcare system (through receiving COVID-19 vaccination, and completing a wellness visit) had higher mean HCL scores on this assessment. This is consistent with historical literature showing that education on health insurance could be a useful tool in improving individuals’ understanding of their plans and healthcare options¹⁶. Further research should evaluate the relationship between HCL and ability to navigate and understand health insurance.

There are limitations worth noting in our approach. Firstly, the survey data is cross-sectional, and therefore we were unable to confirm causal relationships between health literacy and the medical cost literacy questions assessed. And as with any survey, there may be response biases present. This survey was only offered to English-speaking respondents, effectively excluding a portion of the US population. Despite its limitations, there are important strengths to this work. Importantly, this work is novel; research into cost literacy specifically associated with healthcare is very limited in nature. Secondly, the study is nationally representative allowing us to draw conclusions and generate hypotheses that are generalizable to the U.S.

This study is the first one to survey US adults on their familiarity and confidence with navigating the financial components of the healthcare system. Developing a further-validated measure of HCL for further research would help public health practitioners develop and evaluate interventions to improve HCL, especially for those who need it most.

The US healthcare system is convoluted and challenging to navigate; it is unsurprising that many individuals struggle with understanding the costs associated with medical care. Although research has shown that patients want to be informed about healthcare costs^17,18, it is evident that there is work to be done in terms of increasing literacy around costs associated with healthcare – particularly for adults in middle-age and those with lower levels of health literacy.