The role of Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles funestus in malaria transmission within houses with different characteristics in South-eastern Tanzania

Background

Malaria continues to be a major global public health concern, with an estimated 2 billion cases and 11.7 million deaths worldwide, particularly affecting Sub-Saharan African countries [1]. Malaria is primarily transmitted through the bites of infected female mosquitoes belonging to the Anopheles species. Four plasmodium species, namely Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium malariae, Plasmodium vivax, and Plasmodium ovale, are responsible for causing malaria [2]. Plasmodium falciparum was reported as the causative agent in 96% of malaria infections in Tanzania, particularly in malaria-endemic regions, while Plasmodium malariae and Plasmodium ovale accounted for the remaining 4% [3]. Tanzania has made commendable progress in reducing the malaria transmission rate, with prevalence dropping from 18.1% to 7.3% between 2007 and 2017 [3, 4]. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a slight increase of 1% in malaria cases due to healthcare system priorities and individual precautions [6]. Low- and middle-income countries, including Tanzania and Uganda, faced challenges in treating malaria during the pandemic [6, 7].

Furthermore, the persistence of malaria transmission in villages is influenced by various factors, including migratory farming. Families residing in temporary, semi-open shacks (shamba huts) for extended periods while working on distant farms are at higher risk of malaria due to inadequate mosquito protection [9]. Additionally, many houses in Kilombero Valley lack proper screening of eave spaces, windows, and doors, potentially allowing mosquitoes to enter homes [10–12]. Several studies suggest that modern house features are favored by residents due to the perception that these features reduce mosquito bites [13], However, in rural settings, concerns about the cost of maintaining these features have been raised. House improvement has been identified as an intervention that provides protection to all individuals in the house without involving insecticides [14]. In a study conducted by Bofu et al. in Kilombero in 2023, the community expressed the need for house improvement to protect families [13]. Despite reports of improved houses reducing malaria risk, there has been limited effort in national and international malaria strategies to prioritize housing improvement as part of malaria control.

The success in reducing malaria prevalence in Tanzania can be attributed to various interventions, such as the widespread use of long-lasting insecticide Nets (LLINs), indoor residual spraying (IRS), improvements in healthcare standards, and socio-economic enhancements, including better housing, education, income levels, and overall wealth [15]. Despite these efforts, residual malaria transmission persists in some rural areas of Tanzania [16]. One significant challenge contributing to malaria persistence is the insecticide resistance observed in Anopheles funestus mosquitoes, partly influenced by improper agricultural pesticide use [10, 11] Other factors, including malaria vectors, exhibit diverse behaviors that affect transmission[16]. Another important factor is the resting behavior of mosquitoes that are not resting on the targeted surfaces for indoor residual spraying [19].

In the 2000s, Kilombero and Ulanga districts primarily had An. arabiensis as the dominant malaria vector, despite An. funestus being more important [20]. Recent years have witnessed a significant shift in malaria transmission dynamics in Kilombero Valley, where An. funestus has become the predominant vector, responsible for over 85% of malaria transmission[21]. Both malaria vectors are developing resistance to commonly used chemicals [17,18,22].

Addressing malaria control in Kilombero Valley requires a multifaceted approach that targets Anopheles funestus, the current dominant primary vector, and addresses factors like healthcare access, housing conditions, and environmental management including appropriate applications of agricultural pesticide. This study aims to evaluate the role of malaria vectors in malaria transmission in regarding to house characteristics in Kilombero Valley.

Material and Methods

Study area

The study was carried out in Ulanga district, located in the south-eastern region of Tanzania (Fig 1). Mosquitoes were collected from three villages: Ebuyu (−8.979 S, 36.760 E), Chirombola (−8.926 S, 36.753 E) and Mzelezi (−8.898 S, 36.735 E). Average annual rainfall ranging between 1200 -1800mm and a mean annual temperature were 20–32 °C, as reported by Ngowo et al. in 2017 [23]. The primary economic activities in this area are rice and maize cultivation. Currently, Ulanga district faces the prevalence of two major malaria vectors, namely, Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles funestus.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig 1.

Map of the study area, showing study villages in Ulanga district, south-eastern Tanzania.

The typical housing structures in this region feature clay brick walls, open eaves (the space between the roof and walls), and open windows. Plasmodium falciparum stands as the predominant malaria parasite species in this area, while its transmission is primarily attributed to Anopheles funestus [21].

Results

Blood meal analysis

A total of 304 blood-fed An. funestus (identified by PCR) that were collected indoors and outdoors for both host-seeking and resting mosquitoes collection were tested for vertebrate host blood source (human, bovine, dog and chicken) from all three villages. Overall, the proportion of An. funestus that fed on humans was 88.16% (134/152), with dog blood being the most common non-human source Fig 2.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig 2.

Showing a blood meal of An. funestus from different blood sources identified by ELISA method from the sample collected in Ulanga district, Mzelezi, Ebuyu and Chirombora villages.

Discussion

This study shows that both An. funestus and An. arabiensis were the most prevalent mosquito species among the anopheline population in the study villages. Notably, Anopheles funestus predominated over to An. arabiensis in the rural Ulanga villages. However, a recent study revealed that, despite the lower population of An. funestus in comparison to An. arabiensis in the area, it accounted for over 85% of malaria transmission [21].

This study uncovered that Anopheles funestus mosquitoes not only carried the majority of malaria parasites but were also present in high numbers in all three villages. A previous study by Lwetoijera et al. in the Kilombero district also highlighted the increasing significance of Anopheles funestus in malaria transmission, particularly in the context of high resistance [33]. Furthermore, studies conducted in the Kilombero valley by Pinda et al, and Urio et al demonstrated that also Anopheles arabiensis also exhibited significant resistance to pyrethroid chemicals[18,22].

Based on our research findings, Anopheles funestus emerged as the predominant vector in terms of both malaria parasites and population density. In a prior study conducted by Kaindoa et al, [34], Anopheles arabiensis was identified as more abundant species. However, Anopheles funestus reported to harbor the majority of residual malaria parasites, even though it was in the minority compared to Anopheles arabiensis [34]. it seems that, An. funestus is increasing their dominance both in terms of abundance and transmission of malaria, which could be attributed to their resistance to insecticides used in malaria control.

Furthermore, our study revealed that An. funestus exhibited a strong preference for human blood meals over other potential hosts such as dogs and chickens. This anthropophilic behavior is consistent with the species known tendencies [35]. In recently study conducted in Kilombero valley in 2022, Katusi et al. revealed that, An. arabiensis and other secondary malaria vectors showed a preference for bovine blood over human blood. However, in another study conducted in the Kilombero valley, it was observed that An. arabiensis and An. gambiae s.s. exhibited a preference for feeding on chicken hosts over other available hosts [36]. Additionally, a separate study conducted in Kenya reported that mosquitoes deviated from the feeding on humans and opted for hosts other than humans, particularly in areas where livestock herding is prevalent [37], while other studies suggest that animal keeping may influence mosquito densities and potentially pose a risk to humans, while others argue that it could reduce malaria transmission risk [38].

In this study, we observed a relatively small number of An. funestus specie with the capability to feed on two different hosts as described in Table 1. where as An. arabiensis also have been commonly reported to have multiple feeding outdoor [16]. The tendence of mosquitoes feeding to various hosts has also been observed in neighbouring countries [39].

Our findings also indicate that dogs and chickens were the second most common sources of blood meals for An. funestus mosquitoes, following humans. This finding is in line with the prevalence of these animals in rural households, where dogs and chickens are commonly kept [35]. Studies by Katusi et al 2022 and Lyimo et al [35,36], reported that in Kilombero valley availability of cows influence the blood meal for An. arabiensis and An. funestus, like in Kenya found that, human blood were seems to be the most vulnerable to these species [40]. The preference for human blood meals by An. funestus is of particular concern for malaria control, as it increases the risk of malaria transmission to humans and underscores the importance of targeting this species in control strategies. Furthermore, it’s the observed that, higher An. funestus compared than An. arabiensis, suggest that An. funestus is the most responsible for malaria transmission in the area.

The study conducted by Lyimo et al 2013 [36], demonstrated that An. arabiensis was more likely to be affected by ivermectin, primarily applied to cattle, ivermectin affects the survival and egg production of Anopheles mosquitoes, consequently, this intervention appeared to have a controlling effect on An. arabiensis due to their behavior of feeding on other vertebrate blood including cows. On the other hand, there is limited knowledge regarding the impact of ivermectin on An. funestus, which exhibits a stronger preference for feeding on humans rather than cattle. An. funestus, being an indoor-biting species, is expected to be more susceptible to indoor interventions such as Long-Lasting Insecticide Nets (LLINs) and Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS), unfortunately, resistance to these interventions has been reported in this species.

This study also revealed that a substantial number of households had eave gaps and unscreened windows and doors Table 1, conditions that can facilitate mosquito entry and increase the risk of malaria transmission. These findings align with previous research which also emphasize the importance of addressing related factors in malaria control efforts [41].

Our study, also found that houses with eave space harbors more of An. funestus than those with no eave space, similar findings were reported by to Mburu et al 2018, where more Anopheline mosquitoes were caught in the houses with open eaves than other houses with small or single eave [14]. Many houses in the villages prefer to have eave space for air accelerations [42], but in other hands it poses a threat to malaria transmission risks, as mosquitoes are more likely to enter in the house through eave space. Several interventions on house screening have been introduced, this including the idea of eave tube treated with conventional insecticides plus house modification with eave tubes installed with physical barrier inside [42], treated curtains [43] and treated eave ribbons [35, 36], treated chair [46], treated sandals [47], all these tools introduced as structural interventions, in and around the houses, which may impact vector feeding, survivorship, population density and overall vectorial capacity and thus ability to transmit malaria and other pathogens.

This study has a limitation, where by a include small sample sizes was used from all three villages, therefore, further study is needed to study the major malaria vectors in the area, additionally, to investigate the factors that contribute to the rebounded of An. gambiae while they were eradicated by frontline interventions in Kilombero valley in 2000’s.

Conclusion

Anopheles funestus is the prevalent malaria vector in the region and a significant 98% of this species were found to carry sporozoites. Additionaly, Anopheles funestus is one of the two species known to exhibit resistance to insecticides [17,18]. Several concurrent approaches [21,33,44,46–50], are required to complementary existing interventions like LLINs and IRS for effective malaria vector control specifically focus on targeting An. funestus specie.

House improvement and screening have also been contributing to malaria vector control in many developed countries [49]. Despite low quality evidence, the direction and consistence of effects indicate that housing is an important risk factor for malaria [51].

Availability of data and materials

Relevant data are within the paper. Also, data are available at: (DOI):

Competing interest

The author declare that they have no competing interest

Authors contributions

AJL was involved in DN-Mini trap design, study design, preparing the map of the study area, data collection, interpretations of the results, and drafting the manuscript. BJ was involved in the study design, data collection, and manuscript writing; MK was involved in the data collection; HN was involved in data analysis and manuscript review; FO was involved in the DN-Mini trap design, study design, supervision, and manuscript revision; BN was involved in the overall study design, supervision, and manuscript revision and IL was involved in the study design, supervision, and manuscript revision. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study received funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, granted through the Pan-African Mosquito Control Association (PAMCA) (Grant No. OPP 1214408, Ifakara Health Institute).