Abstract
Background Transoral esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) requires sedation and monitored anesthesia care, while transnasal esophagoscopy (TNE) can be performed without sedation.
Despite this benefit, TNE is performed significantly less than EGD in the United States.
Objectives The current project was designed to compare the differential prevalence of TNE and EGD with and without concurrent anesthesia billing among Medicare beneficiaries during 2018-2021.
Materials and Methods The Public Use Files data for TNE, EGD, and anesthesia for EGD billed nationally among Medicare beneficiaries was exported from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) website for 2018-2021 and presented as cumulative data. Projections were made to quantify healthcare cost savings if the number of TNE services were at least 9% of the number of TNE+EGD services and at most 34% of the number of TNE+EGD services from 2018-2021.
Results The key finding was that TNE was rarely performed and billed among Medicare beneficiaries when compared to EGD. In addition, roughly one-third of EGDs among Medicare beneficiaries might have been performed without concurrent anesthesia for EGD billing.
Conclusion Secondary to the need for sedation and monitored anesthesia care, transoral upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is significantly more expensive than transnasal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Medicare could save millions of dollars annually if TNE replaced EGD.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Wayne State University: IRB Administration Office determined that this project did not meet the definition of Human Participant Research subject to IRB oversight and review
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Financial Interests: NONE; Conflicts of Interests: NONE
Anti-Plagiarism Software: Not Checked
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript and its Supplementary Excel File All raw data used are available online at CMS website links as detailed in Supplementary PDF of the manuscript
