Abstract
Psychotic and psychotic-like experiences are thought to emerge from various patterns of disrupted belief updating. These include belief rigidity, overestimating the reliability of sensory information, and misjudging task volatility. Yet, these substrates have never been jointly addressed under one computational framework and it is not clear to what degree they reflect trait-like computational patterns. Here, we introduce a computational model that describes interindividual differences in how individuals update their beliefs about a volatile environment through noisy observations and use this model in a series of studies. In a test-retest study with healthy participants (N = 45, 4 sessions), we find that interclass correlations were moderate to high for session-level model parameters and excellent for averaged belief trajectories and learning rates estimated through hierarchical Bayesian inference. Across three studies (total N=590) we then demonstrate that two distinct computational patterns describe two different transdiagnostic categories. Higher uncertainty about the task volatility is related to schizotypal traits (N = 45, d = 0.687, P = 0.02, N = 437, d = 0.14, P = 0.032) and to positive symptoms in a sample of patients with schizophrenia (N = 108, d = 0.187, P = 0.039), when learning to gain rewards. In contrast, depressive-anxious traits were associated with more rigid beliefs about the underlying mean (N = 437, d = −0.125, P = 0.006) and outcome variance (N = 437, d = −0.111, P = 0.013), as were negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia (d = - 0.223, P = 0.026, d = −0.298, P = 0.003), when learning to avoid losses. These findings suggest that individuals high on schizotypal traits across the psychosis continuum are less likely to learn or utilize higher-order statistical regularities of the environment and showcase the potential of clinically relevant computational phenotypes for differentiating symptom groups in a transdiagnostic manner.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research work was funded by the Vienna Science and Technology Fund (WWTF) with a grant (VRG13-007) awarded to Christoph Eisenegger and Claus Lamm and the Aarhus University Research Foundation Grant (AUFF-E-2019-7-10) awarded to Christoph Mathys.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee of the University of Vienna (# 1918/2015) gave ethical approval for the work in Experiment 1. Data from Experiment 2 are publically available and the work was approved by Trinity College Dublin School of Psychology Research Ethics Committee. Institutional Review Board at the University of Maryland School of Medicine gave ethical approval for the work in Experiment 3.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* Shared senior authors
Data Availability
Data will be available online (https://github.com/nacemikus/jget-schizotypy.git) after the peer-reviewed publication of the manuscript.
