Abstract
Background High allostatic load (AL) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death (CVD), but little is known about how social determinants moderate this relationship.
Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey years 1999-2010 linked with the National Death Index. We fit age, race, and sex-adjusted Fine & Gray models to calculate sub-distribution hazard ratios (SHR) of CVD among adults exposed to high versus low levels of positive social determinants of health (PSDOH), stratified by high and low AL status.
Results Among 22,775 participants, 1,939 (8.5%) had a cancer history. In the full cohort, low PSDOH was associated with 38% increased risk of CVD among high AL adults (SHR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.22 - 1.56) and 57% increased risk among low AL adults (SHR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.32 - 1.87). Among adults with no cancer history, low PSDOH was associated with 36% increased risk among high AL adults (SHR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.19 – 1.55) and 59% increased risk among low AL adults (SHR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.32 – 1.92). In the cancer cohort, low PSDOH was associated with 77% increased risk among high AL adults (SHR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.32 – 2.37) and 73% increased risk among low AL adults (SHR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.02 – 2.94).
Conclusions Low PSDOH amplified the association between AL and CVD in all cohorts, with the highest risk increases among adults with cancer history. This suggests that socioeconomic-related distress supersedes biological changes from AL in relation to CVD.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Funding, grant/award info: supported by American Heart Association-Strategically Focused Research Network Grant in Disparities in Cardio-Oncology (#847740, #863620) and Department of Defense Prostate Cancer Research Program's Physician Research Award (#HT94252310158).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was exempt from review by the Institutional Review Board as we analyzed the NHANES cohort, which is considered secondary, publicly available, and de-identified data.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Competing interests: None of the authors has any competing interest.
Planning of study: AG conceived the study concept, and the study design was by AB, RR, AG, and JM.
Conduct of Study: AB and RR had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Reporting of Study: AB and RR drafted the first version of the manuscript. All authors provided critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Data sharing statement: The NHANES database is publicly accessible (https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/Default.aspx) and contains deidentified data for all participants used in this study.
Ethical approval information: The Institutional Review Boards considered this study exempt from review because of the use of secondary, publicly available, and de-identified data.
Data Availability
The NHANES database is publicly accessible (https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/Default.aspx) and contains deidentified data for all participants used in this study.
Abbreviations
- AL
- allostatic load
- NHANES
- National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
- SHR
- sub-distribution hazard ratio
- CVD
- Cardiovascular disease
- PSDOH
- positive social determinants of health
- SES
- socioeconomic status
- BMI
- body mass index
- SBP
- systolic blood pressure
- DBP
- diastolic blood pressure
- HBA1C
- hemoglobin
- A1C CRP
- c-reactive protein
