ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION We evaluated the impact of a real-time locating system on emergency department efficiency and frustration locating mobile otoscope/ophthalmoscope carts.
DATA AND METHODS Thirty ED providers were selected on-shift, each serving as their own control. Investigators hid two mobile otoscope/ophthalmoscopes carts (with and without the RTLS device) equidistant from the center of a provider’s work area. Providers were timed finding both devices and were queried regarding feelings about the search experience.
RESULTS RTLS was associated with statistically-significantly less time locating equipment (average of 25 vs. 92 seconds) and percent of providers requiring 30, 60, 90, and 120 seconds to find the device. Providers felt finding the mobile cart with RTLS was easier; all rated finding the RTLS-tagged cart as easy. Without RTLS, two-thirds of subjects reported either frustration or extreme frustration vs. 3% with RTLS. All differences in comparisons of subjective experience were statistically-significant. Annual time and cost saving with RTLS would be 116.4 hours ($9,135.66).
CONCLUSION RTLS in EDs can decrease time and frustration associated with finding equipment and is cost-effective. Frustration is a common driver behind burnout in Emergency Medicine. Use of RTLS technology might improve the provider experience and, thereby, reduce burnout levels.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
As a quality improvement project, this study was deemed not to meet the definition of research by the Institutional Review Board in its Human Subjects Determination Request evaluation. This study was reviewed by the Northwell IRB, which determined it was a performance improvement project and not human subjects research (Human Subjects Research Determination: 23-0100).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.
