Abstract
Background Phase three trials of the monoclonal antibodies lecanemab and donanemab, which target brain amyloid, have reported statistically significant differences in clinical endpoints in early Alzheimer’s disease. These drugs are already in use in some countries and are going through the regulatory approval process for use in the UK. Concerns have been raised about the ability of healthcare systems, including those in the UK, to deliver these treatments considering the resources required for their administration and monitoring.
Aim To estimate the scale of real-world demand for monoclonal antibodies for AD in the United Kingdom.
Method We used anonymised patient record databases from two National Health Service trusts for the year 2019 to collect clinical, demographic, cognitive and neuroimaging data for these cohorts. Eligibility for treatment was assessed using the inclusion criteria from the clinical trials of donanemab and lecanemab with consideration given to diagnosis, cognitive performance, cerebrovascular disease, and willingness to receive treatment.
Results We examined the records of 82,386 people referred to services covering some 2.2 million people. After applying the trial criteria, we estimate that a maximum of 906 people per year would start treatment with monoclonal antibodies in the two services, equating to 30,200 people if extrapolated nationally.
Conclusions Monoclonal antibody treatments for AD are likely to present a significant challenge for healthcare services to deliver in terms of the neuroimaging and treatment delivery. The data provided here allows health services to understand the potential demand and plan accordingly.
Competing Interest Statement
B.R.U. has been principal investigator in a number of commercial trials of novel agents in Alzheimer's disease, including anti amyloid therapy, though has not been involved in any of the trials referenced here. He is a member of the Faculty of Old Age Psychiatry Executive Committee. He has received ad hoc payments for advisory roles to market research companies representing pharma. He is the R&D director at his trust (which has received financial support from industry to develop its clinical trials infrastructure), CRN lead for dementia for the east of England and national CRN lead for stratified medicine in dementia. R.B. has worked on Roche studies (including CI for Graduate study with gantenerumab) and Biogen (sub-investigator for aducanumab) and has previously received ad hoc payments from Roche and Biogen for advisory roles. J.D.I. is clinical director of NHS England (London) dementia clinical network. He has received conference expenses and consultancy fees (paid to his institution) from Roche, a speaker's fee (paid to his institution) from Biogen and payment (to his institution) from Nestle Health Science for membership of a clinical trial steering committee. A.V.V. has received grants from the Alzheimer's Society, Alzheimer's Research UK, and NIHR BRC, including an NIHR BRC Maudsley Neuroimaging Grant. A.V.V. is funded by NIHR as NIHR Clinical Lecturer and supported by the NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London (NQOD-04) as PI of SLaM Image Bank. C.M. is part-funded by NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London. R.S. declares research support received in the last 3 years from Janssen, GSK and Takeda. M.S.K. has attended as a panel member at ARUK conference on new treatments. A.A.S.L. is funded by the NIHR as an Academic Clinical Fellow and is a member of the NIHR Dementia Portfolio Development Group. T.R., T.S., C.M., M.M., J.L. have nothing to declare.
Funding Statement
This research, and the QMIN-MC study, was supported by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203312). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. B.R.U.'s post is part funded by a generous donation from Goldman Sachs giving. R.S. is part-funded by: i) the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London; ii) the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) South London at King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; iii) UKRI - Medical Research Council through the DATAMIND HDR UK Mental Health Data Hub (MRC reference: MR/W014386); iv) the UK Prevention Research Partnership (Violence, Health and Society; MR-VO49879/1), an initiative funded by UK Research and Innovation Councils, the Department of Health and Social Care (England) and the UK devolved administrations, and leading health research charities.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
We used the anonymised research patient record database from Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust (CPFT) for the calendar year 2019. This database has overarching ethical approval from the Cambridge Central Research Ethics Committee (12/EE/0407,17/EE/0442) and this project was further assessed and approved by the CPFT research database committee. We evaluated the replicability of our findings using the deidentified patient record from the South London and Maudsley NHS trust (SLaM) The source data are approved for secondary analysis (Oxford REC, reference 18/SC/0372), and via the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) BRC Maudsley Neuroimaging Call (NQOD-04) for SLaM Image Bank access.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
