Abstract
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of the PRIMA subretinal neurostimulation system 48-months post-implantation for improving visual acuity (VA) in patients with geographic atrophy (GA) due to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) at 48-months post-implantation.
Design First-in-human clinical trial of the PRIMA subretinal prosthesis in patients with atrophic AMD, measuring best-corrected ETDRS VA (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03333954).
Subjects Five patients with GA, no foveal light perception and VA of logMAR 1.3 to 1.7 in their worse-seeing “study” eye.
Methods In patients implanted with a subretinal photovoltaic neurostimulation array containing 378 pixels of 100 μm in size, the VA was measured with and without the PRIMA system using ETDRS charts at 1 meter. The system’s external components: augmented reality glasses and pocket computer, provide image processing capabilities, including zoom.
Main Outcome Measures VA using ETDRS charts with and without the system. Light sensitivity in the central visual field, as measured by Octopus perimetry. Anatomical outcomes demonstrated by fundus photography and optical coherence tomography up to 48-months post- implantation.
Results All five subjects met the primary endpoint of light perception elicited by the implant in the scotoma area. In one patient the implant was incorrectly inserted into the choroid. One subject died 18-months post-implantation due to study-unrelated reason. ETDRS VA results for the remaining three subjects are reported herein. Without zoom, VA closely matched the pixel size of the implant: 1.17 ± 0.13 pixels, corresponding to mean logMAR 1.39, or Snellen 20/500, ranging from 20/438 to 20/565. Using zoom at 48 months, subjects improved their VA by 32 ETDRS letters versus baseline (SE 5.1) 95% CI[13.4,49.9], p<0.0001. Natural peripheral visual function in the treated eye did not decline after surgery compared to the fellow eye (p=0.08) during the 48 months follow-up period.
Conclusions Subretinal implantation of PRIMA in subjects with GA suffering from profound vision loss due to AMD is feasible and well tolerated, with no reduction of natural peripheral vision up to 48-months. Using prosthetic central vision through photovoltaic neurostimulation, patients reliably recognized letters and sequences of letters,and with zoom it provided a clinically meaningful improvement in VA of up to eight ETDRS lines.
Competing Interest Statement
MMKM, YLM, LODK, FH, DP are consultants to Pixium Vision. JAS discloses founding shares and past consulting for Pixium Vision. DP patents are licensed by Stanford University to Pixium Vision.
Clinical Trial
NCT03333954
Funding Statement
This study was funded by Pixium Vision and in part by the Sight Again project under the Structural R&D Projects for Competitiveness (PSPC) and Investment for the Future (PIA) funding, managed by Bpifrance. DP was funded in part by the National Institutes of Health (grant R01-EY027786). The Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital, supported in part by the National Institute for Health and Care Research, UK, is also acknowledged. The Clinical Investigation Center at the Quinze-Vingts National Hospital is supported in part by the Inserm-DHOS, France.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study received ethical approval from the Comite de Protection des Personnes Ile de France II and the Agence Nationale de Securite du Medicament et des Produits de Santa.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Preliminary results of this study were presented at the American Society of Retina Specialists, Annual Meeting 2023, and The Eye and the Chip conference 2023
Financial support: This study was funded by Pixium Vision and in part by the Sight Again project under the Structural R&D Projects for Competitiveness (PSPC) and Investment for the Future (PIA) funding, managed by Bpifrance. DP was funded in part by the National Institutes of Health (grant R01-EY027786). The Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital, supported in part by the National Institute for Health and Care Research, UK, is also acknowledged. The Clinical Investigation Center at the Quinze-Vingts National Hospital is supported in part by the Inserm-DHOS, France.
Conflict of Interest: MMKM, YLM, LODK, FH, DP are consultants to Pixium Vision. JAS discloses founding shares and past consulting for Pixium Vision. DP’s patents are licensed by Stanford University to Pixium Vision.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
