Abstract
Background Previous observational studies in patients with diabetes have examined the relationship between insulin resistance (IR) and cognitive outcomes and failed to find that IR is associated with cognitive function. And the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, which measured serum triglyceride (TG) and fasting blood glucose (FBG), has been suggested as a surrogate reliable marker of IR and widely used due to its convenience and cost-effectiveness.However, to the best of our knowledge, the relationship between IR and intensive blood pressure control in specific cognitive outcomes has never been investigated.
Methods To fill this knowledge gap, we analyzed the relationship between TYG levels and cognitive outcomes in hypertensive patients within the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). The SPRINT evaluated the impact of intensive blood pressure control (systolic blood pressure < 120 mmHg) versus standard blood pressure control (systolic blood pressure < 140 mmHg). The Cox proportional risk regression was used to investigate the association between different TYG status and clinical outcomes. Additional stratified analyzes were performed to evaluate the robustness of gender difference.
Results A total of 9,323 participants (6016 [64.53%] males and 3307 [35.47%] females) with hypertension from the SPRINT research were included in the analysis. The median follow-up period was 3.26 years. Our population was divided into three groups according to the size of the TyG index. The low TyG group was the reference. Sensitivity analyzes showed that in the SPRINT, the TyG index was significantly associated with the risk of cognitive outcomes across various subgroups. There was no significant interaction in the confounders.
Conclusions In this cohort study, results suggest that patients with TyG levels higher had lower risk of probable dementia, but this study tested association, not causation. Our results demonstrated that in patients with hypertension, the association between TyG and risk of probable dementia is L-shaped.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
this is a post hoc analysis
Funding Statement
no funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Beijing Anzhen Hospital
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
Availability of data and materials Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: https://biolincc.nhlbi.nih.gov/studies/sprint/.
