ABSTRACT
Introduction Approximately 130 000 infants acquire HIV annually despite global maternal antiretroviral therapy scale-up. We evaluated the potential clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of offering long-acting, anti-HIV broadly neutralizing antibody (bNAb) prophylaxis to infants in three distinct settings.
Methods We simulated infants in Côte d’Ivoire, South Africa, and Zimbabwe using the Cost-Effectiveness of Preventing AIDS Complications-Pediatric (CEPAC-P) model. We modeled strategies offering a three-bNAb combination in addition to WHO-recommended standard-of-care oral prophylaxis to infants: a) with known, WHO-defined high-risk HIV exposure at birth (HR-HIVE); b) with known HIV exposure at birth (HIVE); or c) with or without known HIV exposure (ALL). Modeled infants received 1-dose, 2-doses, or Extended (every 3 months through 18 months) bNAb dosing. Base case model inputs included 70% bNAb efficacy (sensitivity analysis range: 10-100%), 3-month efficacy duration/dosing interval (1-6 months), and $20/dose cost ($5-$100/dose). Outcomes included pediatric HIV infections, life expectancy, lifetime HIV-related costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs, in US$/year-of-life-saved [YLS], assuming a <50% GDP per capita cost-effectiveness threshold).
Results The base case model projects that bNAb strategies targeting HIVE and ALL infants would prevent 7-26% and 10-42% additional pediatric HIV infections, respectively, compared to standard-of-care alone, ranging by dosing approach. HIVE-Extended would be cost-effective (cost-saving compared to standard-of-care) in Côte d’Ivoire and Zimbabwe; ALL-Extended would be cost-effective in South Africa (ICER: $882/YLS). BNAb strategies targeting HR-HIVE infants would result in greater lifetime costs and smaller life expectancy gains than HIVE-Extended. Throughout most bNAb efficacies and costs evaluated in sensitivity analyses, targeting HIVE infants would be cost-effective in Côte d’Ivoire and Zimbabwe, and targeting ALL infants would be cost-effective in South Africa.
Discussion Adding long-acting bNAbs to current standard-of-care prophylaxis would be cost-effective, assuming plausible efficacies and costs. The cost-effective target population would vary by setting, largely driven by maternal antenatal HIV prevalence and postpartum incidence.
Competing Interest Statement
SP is a consultant for Merck, Moderna, Pfizer, Dynavax, Hoopika, and GSK, and has a sponsored research program with Moderna and Merck in the area of cytomegalovirus (CMV) vaccines. AG is a co-PI on COVID-vaccine studies funded through the SAMRC by the HIV vaccine trials network, EDCTP, ANRS, ImmunityBio, Janssen, and Moderna. AB and EJF receive funding from IMPAACT and AB receives funding from Unitaid for trials evaluating non-bNAb approaches to maternal-infant HIV prophylaxis. CKC participated in a RSV advisory board for Sanofi and previously received grants from Gilead, paid to her University, for clinical research. SM, KC, PEF, DS, and VMK are employed by IAVI, a non-profit organization that is pursuing the development of a combination anti-HIV bNAb product. No other authors report conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
This study was made possible by the support of the American people through the United States President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The study was also supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) [K08HD101342 to CMD, R01HD079214 to ALC and MCW], the MGH Research Scholars Award (to ALC), and the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Network (IMPAACT) [DR808 to CMD and ALC]. Overall support for IMPAACT was provided by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) with co-funding from NICHD and the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); all components of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), under Award Numbers UM1AI068632 (IMPAACT LOC), UM1AI068616 (IMPAACT SDMC) and UM1AI106716 (IMPAACT LC), and by NICHD contract number HHSN275201800001I. The contents of this manuscript are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official views of PEPFAR, USAID, NIH, South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC), or the United States Government. Representatives from USAID and IAVI collaborated on the design and interpretation of the analysis. No other funders had a role in the study's design, analysis, or interpretation, nor were they involved in the manuscript writing process or decision to submit for publication.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding: This study was made possible by the support of the American people through the United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The study was also supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) [K08HD101342 to CMD, R01HD079214 to ALC and MCW], the MGH Research Scholars Award (to ALC), and the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Network (IMPAACT) [DR808 to CMD and ALC]. Overall support for IMPAACT was provided by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) with co-funding from NICHD and the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); all components of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), under Award Numbers UM1AI068632 (IMPAACT LOC), UM1AI068616 (IMPAACT SDMC) and UM1AI106716 (IMPAACT LC), and by NICHD contract number HHSN275201800001I. The contents of this manuscript are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official views of PEPFAR, USAID, NIH, South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC), or the United States Government. Representatives from USAID and IAVI collaborated on the design and interpretation of the analysis. No other funders had a role in the study’s design, analysis, or interpretation, nor were they involved in the manuscript writing process or decision to submit for publication.
Conflicts of Interest: SP is a consultant for Merck, Moderna, Pfizer, Dynavax, Hoopika, and GSK, and has a sponsored research program with Moderna and Merck in the area of cytomegalovirus (CMV) vaccines. AG is a co-PI on COVID-vaccine studies funded through the SAMRC by the HIV vaccine trials network, EDCTP, ANRS, ImmunityBio, Janssen, and Moderna. AB and EJF receive funding from IMPAACT and AB receives funding from Unitaid for trials evaluating non-bNAb approaches to maternal-infant HIV prophylaxis. CKC participated in a RSV advisory board for Sanofi and previously received grants from Gilead, paid to her University, for clinical research. SM, KC, PEF, DS, and VMK are employed by IAVI, a non-profit organization that is pursuing the development of a combination anti-HIV bNAb product. No other authors report conflicts of interest.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
