Abstract
A commonly-used form of human mobility data, called in-app mobility data, is based on GPS locations collected from a panel of mobile applications. In this paper, we analysed daily travel patterns from in-app GPS data in the United Kingdom to identify characteristic modes of travel behaviour, and assessed whether certain behavioural modes were more common among users of different groups of mobile applications. We also explored the relative importance of different mobility behaviours for the topology of an aggregated travel network. Our findings point to the presence of behavioural bias in in-app mobility data driven by the interaction between mobile device users and specific mobile applications. Our study also presents a general methodology for detecting behavioural bias in in-app mobility data, allowing for greater transparency into the characteristics of in-app mobility datasets without risking individual privacy or identifying specific mobile applications underlying a given dataset. Overall, the analysis highlights the need to understand the process of data generation for in-app mobility data, and the way that this process can bias the collective dynamics reported in aggregate mobility data.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors acknowledge the following funding sources: ESRC UBEL Doctoral Training Partnership (ESRC: ES/P000592/1) (HG). Retail Business Datasafe (ESRC: ES/L011840/1) (JC). RME was also supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) in Modelling and Health Economics, a partnership between UK HSA, Imperial College London, and LSHTM (grant number NIHR200908). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the UK Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), NIHR, or UKHSA.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This research has been approved by the University College London Research Ethics Service (ref: 21813/001).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
This manuscript has been revised to focus on the role played by different mobile apps in defining the mobility dynamics reported by in-app GPS mobility data.
Data Availability
This analysis is based on GPS location data collected by the UK-based data aggregator Huq. Data is available for academic research by application to Huq Industries (https://huq.io/). Analysis of individual-level GPS trajectories was performed in a secure computing environment (https://www.ucl.ac.uk/isd/services/file-storage-sharing/data-safe-haven-dsh). Data and code supporting this manuscript are openly available via GitHub (https://github.com/hamishgibbs/huq_behaviour_clustering_paper).
https://github.com/hamishgibbs/huq_behaviour_clustering_paper
