Abstract
Purpose Amplitude modulations (AM) are important for speech intelligibility, and deficits in speech intelligibility are a leading source of impairment in childhood listening difficulties (LiD). The present study aimed to explore the relationships between AM perception and speech-in-noise (SiN) comprehension in children and to determine whether deficits in AM processing contribute to childhood LiD. Evoked responses were used to parse the neural origin of AM processing.
Method Forty-one children with LiD and forty-four typically-developing children, ages 8-16 y.o., participated in the study. Behavioral AM depth thresholds were measured at 4 and 40 Hz. SiN tasks included the LiSN-S and a Coordinate Response Measure (CRM)-based task. Evoked responses were obtained during an AM Change detection task using alternations between 4 and 40 Hz, including the N1 of the acoustic change complex, auditory steady-state response (ASSR), P300, and a late positive response (LP). Maturational effects were explored via age correlations.
Results Age correlated with 4 Hz AM thresholds, CRM Separated Talker scores, and N1 amplitude. Age-normed LiSN-S scores obtained without spatial or talker cues correlated with age-corrected 4 Hz AM thresholds and area under the LP curve. CRM Separated Talker scores correlated with AM thresholds and area under the LP curve. Most behavioral measures of AM perception correlated with the SNR and phase coherence of the 40 Hz ASSR. AM Change RT also correlated with area under the LP curve. Children with LiD exhibited deficits with respect to 4 Hz thresholds, AM Change accuracy, and area under the LP curve.
Conclusions The observed relationships between AM perception and SiN performance extend the evidence that modulation perception is important for understanding SiN in childhood. In line with this finding, children with LiD demonstrated poorer performance on some measures of AM perception, but their evoked responses implicated a primarily cognitive deficit.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by grant R01 DC014078 from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders and by the Cincinnati Childrens Research Foundation
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Institutional Review Board of Cincinnati Childrens Hospital Research Foundation gave ethical approval for this work. Informed parental consent and child assent was obtained prior to enrollment.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos