Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a complex disease with monogenic, polygenic and environmental risk factors. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are being developed to identify high polygenic risk individuals. Due to differences in genetic background, PRS distributions vary by ancestry, necessitating calibration.
Methods We compared four calibration methods using the All of Us Research Program Whole Genome Sequence data for a CRC PRS previously developed in participants of European and East Asian ancestry. The methods contrasted results from linear models with A) the entire data set or an ancestrally diverse training set AND B) covariates including principal components of ancestry or admixture. Calibration with the training set adjusted the variance in addition to the mean.
Results All methods performed similarly within ancestry with OR (95% C.I.) per s.d. change in PRS: African 1.5 (1.02, 2.08), Admixed American 2.2 (1.27, 3.85), European 1.6 (1.43, 1.89), and Middle Eastern 1.1 (0.71, 1.63). Using admixture and an ancestrally diverse training set provided distributions closest to standard Normal with accurate upper tail frequencies.
Conclusion Although the PRS is predictive of CRC risk for most ancestries, its performance varies by ancestry. Post-hoc calibration preserves the risk prediction within ancestries. Training a calibration model on ancestrally diverse participants to adjust both the mean and variance of the PRS, using admixture as covariates, created standard Normal z-scores. These z-scores can be used to identify patients at high polygenic risk, and can be incorporated into comprehensive risk scores including other known risk factors, allowing for more precise risk estimates.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by the Office of the Director at the National Institute of Health, under award notice 1OT2OD002748-01 and by the NHGRI through the grant U01HG008657.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The All of Us Research Program gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
We included equations, discussion of why standard Normal is preferred, Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests and elaborations on the comparisons made.
Data and code availability
Data from the NIH All of Us study are available via institutional data access for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data. To register as a researcher with All of Us, researchers may use the following URL and complete the laid out steps: https://www.researchallofus.org/register/. Researchers can contact All of Us Researcher Workbench Support at support{at}researchallofus.org. Procedures were followed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the All of Us Research Program. The All of Us IRB follows the regulations and guidance of the NIH Office for Human Research Protections for all studies, ensuring that the rights and welfare of research participants are overseen and protected uniformly. Proper informed consent was obtained. Before signing forms saying that they consent to participate, participants view a series of screens with text and short videos that explain the program’s goals, how it works, and what participation entails. Code used in this study is available at the Researcher Workbench “Compare ancestry calibration methods for a CRC PRS” located at https://workbench.researchallofus.org/workspaces/aou-rw-ed3b00c1/compareancestrycalibrationmethodsforacrcprs/analysis.
