Abstract
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are widely used and persistent chemicals, leading to ubiquitous exposure. Although high PFAS levels have been associated with an adverse cardiovascular risk profile, the distribution of levels and relations with cardio-metabolic risk markers in the general population have not been fully characterized. We assessed the association between blood levels of perfluorooctaneic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), and perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS) and a range of lipoproteins and metabolites as well as clinical lipid measurements. We used data from participants of the Netherlands Epidemiology of Obesity study (NEO) (n= 584) and the Rhineland Study (n= 1,962), jointly spanning an age range of 30 to 89 years. PFAS were measured with the Metabolon HD4 platform, and lipoprotein and metabolite profiles were measured using Nightingale’s nuclear magnetic resonance-spectroscopy platform, and mainly comprised lipoprotein markers. Using linear regression analyses, we quantified age-, sex- and education-adjusted associations of PFOA, PFOS, and PFHxS with clinical lipid measurements and 224 lipoproteins and metabolites.
Higher levels of PFAS, particularly PFOS and PFHxS, were associated with higher concentrations of total lipid, cholesterol and phospholipid content in most HDL, IDL, LDL and VLDL subclasses. The effect sizes were age-dependent for the majority of the associations, with the deleterious effects of PFAS being generally stronger in people below compared to those above median age. Our observation that in the general population even low PFAS concentrations are associated with an unfavorable lipid profile, calls for further critical regulation of PFAS substances.
Competing Interest Statement
R. Li-Gao is a part-time clinical research consultant for Metabolon, Inc. All other authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to declare.
Funding Statement
The NEO study is supported by the participating Departments, Division, and Board of Directors of the Leiden University Medical Center, and by the Leiden University, Research Profile Area Vascular and Regenerative Medicine. D.O. Mook-Kanamori. is supported by Dutch Science Organization (ZonMW-VENI Grant No. 916.14.023). D. van Heemst. and R. Noordam were supported by a grant of the VELUX Stiftung [grant number 1156]. T.O. Faquih was supported by the King Abdullah Scholarship Program and King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center [No. 1012879283]. The Rhineland Study was partly supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) under Germany's Excellence Strategy (EXC2151-390873048) and SFB1454 - project number 432325352; the Federal Ministry of Education and Research under the Diet-Body-Brain Competence Cluster in Nutrition Research (grant numbers 01EA1410C and FKZ:01EA1809C) and in the framework "PreBeDem - Mit Pravention und Behandlung gegen Demenz" (FKZ: 01KX2230); and the Helmholtz Association under the Initiative and Networking Fund (No. RA-285/19) and the 2023 Innovation Pool.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics approval The NEO study was approved by the medical ethical committee of the Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC) and all participants gave their written informed consent. The ethics committee of the medical faculty of the University of Bonn approved the undertaking of the Rhineland Study and it was carried out according to the recommendations of the International Council for Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice standards. Consent to participate Written informed consent was acquired from all participants per the Declaration of Helsinki in both the NEO and Rhineland Study.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
