Patient’s Satisfaction with Eye Care Services from tertiary Eye hospital in Nepal

Introduction

Patient satisfaction refers to how closely a patient’s expectations of the optimum level of care match up with how they feel they actually received that level of care¹. In recent years, patient happiness has gained in prominence. Many healthcare professionals are starting to recognize its use in evaluating hospital performance, quality, and patient outcomes. These fundamental factors are worldwide problems that several nations at all stages of. As a result, the health care sector is rapidly changing to meet the rising demands and needs of its patient population^2,3. Standards of professional practice and other provider/hospital-oriented indicators, such as technology, have historically been used to measure the quality of healthcare. However, there is less of a focus on objective statistics and more on subjective empirical evidence as a result of this renewed interest in patient-oriented indicators. Moreover, health care recipients in developing countries are more sensitive to perceptions of the quality of healthcare service⁴.

Out of 77 districts of Nepal, 60 of them provides eye care services under NNJS where the users exceed 3 million every year. The number of eye care professionals has expanded to 420 ophthalmologists, over 2000 ophthalmic assistants, and more than 1300 optometrists, with a cataract surgical rate of 4500. As per the Rapid Assessment of avoidable blindness survey in 2021, the National CSC_<6/60 for the total population 50 years and above is 82.7% (95% CI 80.8 - 84.4) which is slightly less than the target of at least 85% recommended by the International Agency for the Prevention of Blindness (IAPB).

Patient satisfaction surveys examine many and novel facets of healthcare, offering a wonderful chance to involve clients or patients in the process of enhancing the standard of services and, consequently, the quality of patients’ lives⁵. Previous studies suggest improvement in communication skills, technical help as well as an alternative option for funding to the patient without health insurance for patient’s satisfaction⁶.

Despite the prevalence of patient satisfaction studies in ophthalmology care around the world, relatively few studies have been undertaken in Nepal. In contrast, many patient satisfaction studies were conducted in Nepal to evaluate health services in other fields of medicine but in regards to eye services very few studies have been conducted. Thus this study aims to analyse the level of patient satisfaction with eye care services received from tertiary hospital of Madhesh Province

Materials and methods

Results and discussion

Discussion

According to the study’s findings, patient satisfaction was generally quite high. Across all parametric metrics, covering the three institutions, 95% of patients said they were “SFD” or “HSFD” with their overall experience. The consequence is that patients believe the perceived quality to be excellent.

When decisions are made concerning service adjustments and improvements, patient satisfaction is vital, hence enhancing patient’s satisfaction may help to increase the chances that they can suggests a certain provider to friends and family who are looking for a qualified physician. For the most part, individuals trust their friends and family for information, especially when choosing a healthcare practitioner^7,8. Roughly 99% of respondents in our study stated they would refer the hospital in question to others. Although patient happiness and referrals are connected metrics, some researchers have discovered that a hospital with high satisfaction does not always translate into high referrals, and the opposite is also true. On the other hand, only one survey participant said they would not recommend the facility to others, even though 5% of respondents (n=59) said they were generally “DSFD” or “HDSFD.” This indicates that evaluations of patient satisfaction and recommendation has to be conducted independently⁹. The majority of this report’s focus was on patient satisfaction with regard to quality and the variables influencing it.

The Kano model, developed by researchers in University of Tokyo is useful to analyse patient’s satisfaction, quality visually and allows for studying different levels of patients expectation¹⁰. The model demonstrates three relationships between satisfaction and quality (expected, performer and delighter). Patients will have a foundational set of unspoken expectations regarding their care that are frequently taken for granted (red line). Since they are routine, these expectations are constant. The majority of patients don’t even perceive them as comparable quality variables, thus their absence will surprise them¹¹. Although the patient may not be aware of these expectations, if they are not fulfilled, the patient is more likely to experience considerable dissatisfaction. This is demonstrated by the sharp drop in satisfaction when care investment becomes less favourable (toward the left on the x-axis). However, even delivering services of this fundamental calibre may not be sufficient to satisfy patients. Thus, the line never crosses the 0 mark, often known as “neutral satisfaction.” The implication is that more criteria are necessary to affect satisfaction. 96% of respondents in our sample were SFD or HSFD with the mannerisms of the medical personnel, the hospital staff, as well as the treatments they received. Based on these figures, it is safe to say that our survey population’s fundamental needs are being satisfied.

The model demonstrates that patients will be unsatisfied if certain quality expectations are not met and that satisfaction rises linearly as more of these expectations are met. Patients make decisions based on comparisons of these expectations to identify distinctions between rivals. In this study, 94% of the participants had access to hospitals during operating hours and were SFD or HSFD. In terms of cleanliness, 87% were SFD/HSFD, and 96% claimed the same for healthcare costs. The delighter quality curve, which only exists in the satisfaction zone, shows unexpectedly high-quality products that patients didn’t know they wanted and that, when they are, provide a pleasant surprise. In this encounter, expectations are surpassed, frequently as a result of innovation that might enhance patient expectations and give a substantial competitive advantage. Hospital data indicate that this is mostly accomplished through the patient’s perception of personalized, personalised service, supplied by compassionate and concerned doctors ¹².

The focus of NNJS and the institutions in its network has always been patient-centred care. As an illustration, patient counselling is a service provided to particular patients who may need more help and knowledge. With 85% of patients (who used the service) reporting being SFD/HSFD, it is a service that is well-received.

Therefore, based on Kano model, patient satisfaction and extension service quality, all the relationship must be considered. This model is an effective way to explain factors affecting patient satisfaction and service quality but its limitation is it does not provide actual reason on patient’s response regarding these different factors. There are many theories that explains patient’s satisfaction in health care. Theories provide a framework on people’s perception and opinion. The two well-known theories are the healthcare quality theory (HQT) and the expectancy value theory (EVT). According to the EVT, a patient’s happiness with care is influenced by their beliefs, values, and prior expectations. The HQT, on the other hand, places a strong emphasis on the importance of the interpersonal aspects of care in promoting patient satisfaction¹³.

Regarding the variables which measured provider’s/staff relationship, there was no association, which concludes the data supports our first theory. The findings reflect respondent’s belief and background, such as respondents with greater levels of education (secondary or higher) reported feeling overall happier than respondents without any formal education. The EVT is used to support our argument that a greater education raises health literacy. When these patients attend the hospital, they have more reasonable expectations because they are better able to gather, interpret, and comprehend fundamental health information. Additionally, those with lower education levels tended to be poorer among our sample’s participants. In reality, 77% of those polled who said they couldn’t make it for more than six months on their principal source of income never attended school.

To determine the characteristics of health literacy and to evaluate its effects on patient satisfaction, preventative services, healthcare utilization, and costs, Stephanie Macleod looked at two populations, “sicker” and “healthier.”¹⁴. They came to the conclusion that these characteristics were negatively connected with poor health literacy, which is more prevalent in older and less educated people. Although health literacy was not a direct outcome of our study, it is conceivable that it can contribute to an understanding of the patterns in the data.

It is also conceivable that deeply ingrained cultural customs may have an impact on patient satisfaction. The conventional view of disease is that it is an outside force acting as a punishment or an external force that can only be stopped by an all-powerful force. Expectations of contemporary medicine and healthcare professionals in general are shaped by these notions. Understanding the patient population that the hospital serves is vital, especially for any misconceptions or unreasonable expectations, as a mismatch between patient expectations and the treatment obtained is linked to decreased satisfaction^15,16. A study that’s explores the role of trust in patient satisfaction, states positive association between patient satisfaction and higher level of trust¹⁷.

In our sample population, 91% of those who identified as ‘DSFD’, ‘FR’, or ‘HDSFD’ overall belonged to the lowest socioeconomic class (as determined by survey criteria). Which, as was already said, may point to a lack of health literacy and possibly distorted expectations of traditional versus modern medicine. Although not every member of this group gave the same answers, it is important to note that there may be an expectation mismatch and/or a lack of trust among them. But in order to answer this, further research on these people and a comparison would be necessary. Future research on this association is important because it may shed light on the psychology of satisfaction in rural and low socioeconomic people.

Limitation

Male patients responded to the survey more frequently than female patients (2:1) in our sample set. because we did not account for this gap in our data analysis, the satisfaction scores primarily reflect the views of men. We do not view this as a significant constraint because there was no statistical difference between the sexes. To determine the reason for this disparity and whether survey weighting would be acceptable for further studies, it is however worthwhile to review our approach used in the data collection process.

Conclusion

According to our research, a sizable majority of patients are satisfied or extremely satisfied. All categories (staff conduct, services, and facilities) reflect this. As a result, it is safe to say that hospitals offer great perceived quality and performance. There are three theoretical curves that can be used to indicate patient satisfaction with regard to quality. Managers of hospitals should make sure that each of these tasks is carried out to its full potential. This entails fulfilling all of the patient’s fundamental requirements, including any performance requirements. The addition of delighters will also have a large effect on patient satisfaction and perceived treatment quality. Our findings suggest that background, beliefs, and individual experiences may all affect pleasure. As a result, demographic data like education level and socioeconomic position are significant factors that need to be taken into account.