Follow this preprint
Multiple imputation assuming missing at random: auxiliary imputation variables that only predict missingness can increase bias due to data missing not at random
View ORCID ProfileElinor Curnow, Rosie P Cornish, Jon E Heron, James R Carpenter, Kate Tilling
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.17.23297137
This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
Elinor Curnow
1Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
2Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Rosie P Cornish
1Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
2Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Jon E Heron
1Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
2Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
James R Carpenter
3Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, London, UK
4Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, University of London, London, UK
Kate Tilling
1Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
2Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

Data Availability
Stata code to verify algebraic results, and also to generate and analyse the data as per the simulation studies is included in Supplementary Material, Section S6. Stata code to perform the real data analysis is included in Supplementary Material, Section S7. The real data are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions. Requests to access these datasets should be directed to alspac-data@bristol.ac.uk.
Posted October 17, 2023.
Multiple imputation assuming missing at random: auxiliary imputation variables that only predict missingness can increase bias due to data missing not at random
Elinor Curnow, Rosie P Cornish, Jon E Heron, James R Carpenter, Kate Tilling
medRxiv 2023.10.17.23297137; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.17.23297137
This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
0
Author Videos
Subject Areas
- Addiction Medicine (414)
- Allergy and Immunology (735)
- Anesthesia (216)
- Cardiovascular Medicine (3150)
- Dermatology (267)
- Emergency Medicine (467)
- Epidemiology (13115)
- Forensic Medicine (15)
- Gastroenterology (875)
- Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4938)
- Geriatric Medicine (455)
- Health Economics (758)
- Health Informatics (3109)
- Health Policy (1110)
- Hematology (414)
- HIV/AIDS (981)
- Medical Education (460)
- Medical Ethics (121)
- Nephrology (508)
- Neurology (4693)
- Nursing (249)
- Nutrition (695)
- Oncology (2421)
- Ophthalmology (689)
- Orthopedics (270)
- Otolaryngology (334)
- Pain Medicine (313)
- Palliative Medicine (88)
- Pathology (523)
- Pediatrics (1258)
- Primary Care Research (530)
- Public and Global Health (7258)
- Radiology and Imaging (1623)
- Respiratory Medicine (950)
- Rheumatology (463)
- Sports Medicine (408)
- Surgery (524)
- Toxicology (65)
- Transplantation (223)
- Urology (193)