Abstract
Background Early in the 2022 mpox outbreak, vaccine doses and administrative capacity were limited. The US recommendation was to administer two doses of the JYNNEOS® vaccine 4 weeks apart. However, because of the limited vaccine supply and high demand, New York City (NYC) prioritized administration of first doses to reach a larger portion of the impacted population as quickly as possible. We estimated mpox cases averted compared to strategies that prioritized 2-dose vaccination for a smaller portion of the population.
Methods We fit a dynamic network transmission model to incident mpox cases reported by NYC, as well as to first and second vaccine doses administered from May 2022 through March 2023. Model output consisted of predicted cases over time when vaccine doses were administered with the ‘first-dose priority’ strategy, compared with counterfactual simulations where individuals were either pre-allocated full courses of the vaccine (‘second-dose priority’ strategy), or not pre-allocated doses, but where doses were administered to those eligible for a second dose ahead of those waiting for a first dose (‘intermediate’ strategy).
Results We estimate that NYC’s ‘first-dose priority’ strategy averted 81% [IQR:75%–86] of potential mpox cases. Their ‘first-dose priority’ strategy was more effective than alternatives, averting 3.0% [IQR:1.2%–4.5%] more cases than the ‘intermediate’ strategy, and 9.5% [IQR:7.7%–12%] more cases than the ‘second-dose priority’ strategy.
Conclusions A focus on widespread, 1 dose vaccination during future mpox outbreaks can reduce cases and limit transmission in scenarios of limited vaccine supply, limited vaccine administration capacity, or increased demand.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Corrected spelling for name of co-author.
