Abstract
Background Individual preferences have preceded the use of health care services, and it has been affected by different hospital attributes. This study aimed to elicit the Iranians’ preferences in choosing hospitals using a discrete choice experiment.
Methods A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted through face to face interviews with 301 respondents. The DCE was constructed by six attributes were included based on a literature review, qualitative interviews, Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and stakeholder consultation: waiting time, quality of care, travel time, hospital type, provider competency, and hospital facilities. individuals’ preferences for hospital attributes were analyzed using a mixed logit model, and interaction terms were used to assess preference heterogeneity among individuals with different sociodemographic characteristics.
Results Participants had strong and significant preferences for care delivered in hospitals with ‘full’ (β=0.6052, p<0.001) or ‘moderate’ (β=0.5882, p<0.001) hospital equipment and with ‘excellent’ provider competency (β=0.2637, p<0.001). The estimated coefficients for the “waiting time of 120 minutes” (β=−0.1625, p<0.001) and the “travel time of 30 minutes” (β=−0.1157, p<0.001) were negative and significant. The results also show that the personal characteristics such as age, education level, and income significantly affected individual preferences in choosing a hospital.
Conclusion Considering people’s preferences can be important given the more active role of today’s patients in decision-making about their treatment processes. The results of this study should be taken into consideration by health policymakers and all stakeholders to be aware of differences in preferences of people and maximize their satisfaction. In this case, it is important to continuously involve people and consider their preferences in the design, topology, construction, and equipment of hospitals.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
this study was funded by Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee of school of public health-Shahid Sadoughi university of medical sciences gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
