Embedding community and public voices in co-created solutions to mitigate antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Thailand using the ‘Responsive Dialogues’ public engagement framework

Tassawan Poomchaichote, Niyada Kiatying-Angsulee, Kanpong Boonthaworn, Bhensri Naemiratch, Supanat Ruangkajorn, Ravikanya Praparsavath, Chaiwat Thirapantu, Karnjariya Sukrung, Direk Limmathurotsakul, Anne Osterrieder, Phaik Yeong Cheah
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.06.23296658

ABSTRACT

The use of antimicrobials in Thailand has been reported as one of the highest in the world in human and animal sectors. Our engagement project aimed to improve our understanding of the issue of antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among adult Thai communities, and to co-create locally relevant solutions to AMR, especially those focusing on raising awareness to improve related policies in Thailand.

We conducted a series of online and in-person ‘conversations’ according to Wellcome’s ‘Responsive Dialogues’ engagement approach, designed to bring together different voices to solve complex problems such as AMR. This approach enabled key AMR stakeholders and policy makers to hear directly from communities and members of the public, and vice versa. Conversations events took place between 25 November 2020 and 8 July 2022, and we engaged 179 AMR key stakeholders and members of the public across Thailand.

The issues we found were: there were quite a lot of misunderstandings around antimicrobials and AMR; participants felt that communications and engagement around antimicrobial resistance had limited reach and impact; asking for and taking antibiotics for self-limiting ailments is a social norm in Thailand; and there appeared to be a wide availability of cheap antimicrobials. To mitigate the spread of AMR, participants suggested that the messages around AMR should be tailored to the target audience, there should be more initiatives to increase general health literacy, there should be increased availability of AMR related information at the local level and there should be increased local leadership of AMR mitigation efforts.

Thaiclinicaltrials.org registration TCTR20210528003 (28/05/2021)

What is already known on this topic

  • ⇒ Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a complex and systemic problem, which will require collaboration from many sectors. Any policies and interventions to address AMR need to be specific to the local context, ethical, and consider the affected communities.

What this study adds

  • ⇒ The regional spread and the depth of our community ‘conversations’ (e.g. 2.5-3 days for in-person ‘conversations’) enabled us to explore topics and important elements of solutions around AMR, summarise common themes, and compare views across different regions and communities in Thailand.

How this study might affect research, practice or policy

  • ⇒ Our project revealed some important ‘building blocks’ or elements for AMR-related policy, in particular relating to communications and engagement: messages around AMR should be tailored to the target audience, there should be more initiatives to increase general health literacy, there should be increased availability of AMR related information at the local level and there should be increased local leadership of AMR mitigation efforts.

INTRODUCTION

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is the ability of microorganisms to stop antimicrobial drugs from working effectively against them 1-3. A recent study estimated that in 2019, 4.95 million deaths globally were associated with bacterial AMR, including 1.27 million deaths that were directly attributable to AMR 4.

AMR has been characterized as a ‘super-wicked’ problem that is systemic, multi-sectorial, multidisciplinary, borderless, global, and ethically challenging 5-7. To maximise success, policies and interventions aiming to mitigate the problem of AMR need to be context-specific and locally driven.

Thailand is an upper-middle income country with a population of approximately 70.2 million people 8,9. It has a high AMR burden 10 and high excess mortality due to hospital-acquired antimicrobial resistant infections 11. It is estimated to have one of the highest antibiotics uses in both human and animal sectors among countries that have published official data on national antibiotic consumption 12-14. In Thailand, by law, most oral antimicrobials, except tuberculosis drugs, can be dispensed by licensed pharmacists at pharmacies without a prescription from a qualified doctor 15. The general public have a limited understanding of AMR, as surveys showed 16,17. In some communities, antibiotics are perceived as a ‘quick fix’ for care, productivity, hygiene and social inequity 18,19.

In this paper we report our findings from piloting a dialogue-based public engagement framework in Thailand. Developed by Wellcome, the “Responsive Dialogues on Drug Resistant Infections” framework was designed to bring together multiple stakeholders and communities across the ‘One Health’ spectrum to tackle complex problems such as AMR right in communities that are most affected 20. The ‘responsive dialogue’ format enables AMR stakeholders and policy makers to hear directly from communities and members of the public and vice versa. The intended outcomes are to bridge the gap between policy and implementation, obtain a wide range of views, and facilitate sustained bi-directional interactions among stakeholders and people from various communities20. In 2019, Wellcome funded two pilots in Thailand and Malawi. This paper summarises the issues relevant to Thailand identified by our participants, and their co-created solutions.

The main objectives of our project were 1) to improve our understanding of the issue of antimicrobial use and AMR among adult Thai communities, and 2) to co-create locally relevant solutions to AMR, thereby improving policies for reducing the burden of AMR in Thailand 21. For practical reasons, we narrowed our scope to interventions and solutions that are actionable by those who participate in the project, in particular those related to engagement and awareness around AMR. This aligns with Strategy 5 (public knowledge and awareness of appropriate use of antimicrobials) of the Thailand National Strategic Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance (NSP-AMR) 22,23. Our project was intended to support the development of Strategy 5 of the new NSP-AMR 2023-2027.

“AMR Dialogues” in Thailand – a multi-phased approach combining in-person and online conversation events

Our “AMR Dialogues” project was conducted in three phases, following guidance of the Wellcome Responsive Dialogues toolkit 20. These were: Phase I, ‘Groundwork’, which involved stakeholder mapping and ‘Planning Conversations’ with stakeholders, and inviting participants from communities; Phase II, ‘Community Conversations’, held in four regions of Thailand, as well as two virtual ‘National Conversations’; and Phase III, evaluation and feedback to stakeholders and participants (Table 1; Suppl. Table 2).

View this table:
Table 1: Timeline of the ‘AMR Dialogues’ project, showing the three project phases, key activities undertaken in each phase, and locations.

Phase I: Groundwork

This phase focused on understanding and mapping the ‘AMR ecosystem’ in Thailand. To produce a Thai AMR stakeholder map, we sought input from: AMR experts; existing literature 20,24; stakeholders attending the ‘Planning Conversations’; and members of the ‘Bangkok Health Research and Ethics Interest Group’ (an established MORU public advisory group). We identified eight major stakeholder groups (Suppl. Table 1).

As part of Phase I, we conducted three “Planning Conversations” with key AMR stakeholders: two face-to-face meetings in Bangkok (Suppl. Table 1) and one virtual workshop due to COVID-19 restrictions.

Stakeholders (defined as anyone with an interest in AMR) included government officers, researchers and experts, healthcare providers, science communication experts, and non-governmental organization representatives with an interest in AMR or related issues such as animal health and environmental issues (e.g., Greenpeace and World Animal Protection). These stakeholders were approached by personal contacts through existing networks of project team members (DL and NK), who were already involved in Thai AMR policy making and had worked in civil society for more than a decade. We specifically invited members of the Thai NSP-AMR subcommittee involved in writing the NSP-AMR 2023-2027 and previous versions to participate. The outcomes of the Planning Conversations were: to understand the AMR ecosystem in Thailand; align our project with the NSP-AMR; identify other stakeholders who should be involved; identify participants for the Community Conversations, provide input into the conversation event agenda, and map out current issues on AMR for discussion with participants. In our virtual workshop we discussed previous AMR engagement initiatives.

For public involvement, we piloted some of the activities and information materials used in Community Conversations with the Bangkok Health Research and Ethics Interest Group25 and revised them based on their feedback.

Evaluation

The evaluation process was integrated into the project from its outset to have a continuous feedback loop21. Evaluation included feedback forms immediately after the Conversations and focus group discussions (FGDs) with selected participants. An estimated 80% of attendees participated in the evaluation. In total, we received 266 evaluation forms; 26 attendees participated in FGDs, and 16 in in-depth interviews (IDIs). The findings informed the subsequent conversations and ensured that the objectives of each phase of the project were achieved. The protocol, information sheet and consent form for the evaluation component of the project was approved by the ethics committee of the Thailand

Institute for the Development of Human Subject Protection (IHRP2021059) and the Oxford University Tropical Research Ethics Committee (OxTREC529-21).

Phase II: Community Conversations

We facilitated two types of Community Conversations: in-person regional conversations and online national conversations. By using this two-pronged approach, we hoped to be as inclusive as possible and maximise the chance of having a diverse audience, to obtain a wide range of perspectives and personal experiences. Each Community Conversation was guided by the following sequence as detailed in the ‘Responsive Dialogues’ toolkit 20: 1) introduce AMR and explore local issues related to AMR, 2) ideate and co-create local solutions and 3) choose promising/feasible solutions to take forward.

For our Community Conversations, we invited participants according to our selection criteria described previously.21 Briefly, we aimed to include people from diverse backgrounds (age, gender, education levels, professions, socioeconomic backgrounds, disabilities), including those who might be affected by any changes in policy around antimicrobials, those who can influence change, and those who might be disproportionately affected by AMR and changes in related policies. We relied on our own networks, which were broad due to previous AMR work, and also approached local key informants and gatekeepers. Participants were invited by email or letter with all relevant details. All expenses incurred were paid by the project. Participants received compensation for their time to participate in the conversations: for regional conversations, we paid for accommodation, actual transportation costs, meals and a per diem of THB 400 per day. Participants in the online national conversations received THB 1000 per session.

In total, our Conversation events had 248 participants (179 individual attendees, some of whom attended more than one conversation event; see Suppl. Table 2 for meeting details and participant backgrounds). The regional conversations focused on regional issues and were held in Chiangmai, Khon Kaen, Hat Yai and Bangkok for participants residing in the northern, north-eastern, southern and central regions of Thailand respectively. For these, we worked with Civicnet Foundation, a community-based organisation with extensive experience in facilitating workshops in communities and inspiring change, to design and lead the activities. The first regional conversation ran over three full days (8 hours a day). In response to attendee feedback, the following three conversation events were shortened to 2.5 days. The national online conversations focused on national issues and were attended by people from all over the country. We conducted two sets of online conversations using Microsoft Teams: a ‘National Conversation’ and a Youth National Conversation’. Each online Conversation event included three 3-hour sessions with the same individuals (Suppl. Table 2). We invited 3-5 AMR stakeholders to join each community conversation, including key players in the NSP-AMR development, communication experts and AMR researchers. Agendas were modified to suit the context of each conversation event and informed by feedback from previous conversations; an example agenda is available online26.

In the conversations, we asked participants to generate as many ideas as possible, without going into too much detail about the practicalities of implementing these ideas. To narrow the scope, we focused on solutions aiming for more effective communication and engagement around AMR, and other tangible solutions actionable by participants themselves. In regional conversations, we asked participants to take into consideration their local health care system, and to create a concrete feasible one-year plan that they could implement in their communities. Suggestions that were not immediately actionable by participants, such as those around legislations or those to be actioned by other parties e.g. large pharmaceutical companies, World Health Organization (WHO), also emerged, but were not discussed in detail and are not reported here. After each conversation, the project team members reflected on the findings and summarized them. To produce the lists of key points, at the end of Phase II all findings and summary notes were analysed using an inductive approach of thematic analysis in interpreting the data into sub-themes, collapsed into bigger themes and linking into a core theme.

Phase III: Feedback to Planning/Community Conversation participants and other stakeholders

In this phase of the project, we presented findings from the Community Conversations to key AMR stakeholders through virtual and in-person meetings, conferences and reports (Table 1). We also invited relevant community leaders, change makers and ‘solution experts’ (e.g. communications experts) to some meetings. The findings and co-created solutions from this project were communicated to those involved in the writing of the NSP-AMR 2023-2027. Furthermore, we fed back our results to all participants using a printed booklet written in accessible language 27. Also included in the booklet were a series of original graphics for use in communication materials. They portray informal antibiotic sales in Thailand (Fig. 1) and scenes from the conversation events (Suppl. Fig 1).

Figure 1:
Figure 1:

Cartoon portraying how easily available antibiotics are in Thailand. A woman complains that her throat hurts and asks for medicine, and a street vendor hands her a cocktail drug (‘yaa chud’) containing antibiotics from his cart, stating that these drugs cure everything (original art by team member KB).

Problems and drivers for AMR in Thailand

Our project revealed four issues and drivers for AMR in Thailand.

1) Misunderstandings around antimicrobials and AMR

Participants mentioned that many people in Thailand refer to antibiotics (in Thai Embedded Image ya patichiwana) as ‘anti-inflammatories’ (in thai Embedded Image ya kae ak-seb). This often leads to a misunderstanding that antibiotics can treat muscle pain and inflammationn and hence be used regularly for aches, pains and fevers. Participants also mentioned that the words ‘antimicrobials’ (in Thai Embedded Image ya tan jun la cheeb) and ‘antibiotics’ in Thai are not easily understood, as they are formal words not used in everyday language. This is likely to be the reason why lay people and even healthcare professionals use other words (e.g. anti-inflammatories) to describe antibiotics and antimicrobials. Many participants did not know that antimicrobials also include antifungals, antiparasitics, and antivirals. This often leads to antibiotics being used for all types of illnesses, including common cold and COVID-19. Some people said that antibiotics are used often for prevention of illness or ‘just in case’.

2) Limited reach and impact of communications and engagement around AMR

Thailand has taken actions to address AMR, including production of videos and printed materials, and organising the annual Antimicrobial Awareness Day/Week, held since 2013 28. The Thailand Ministry of Public Health also launched public campaigns to warn people about the dangers of ‘yaa chud’ poly-pharmacy packs that contain antibiotics. However, many of the participants in the Community Conversations said that they were not aware of the activities. For many, the Community Conversations were the first time they heard of AMR (Suppl. Fig 1). When participants discussed the impact and limitations of existing materials, they thought that some of them were not suitable for the target group, and digital engagement strategies were not able to reach those without internet access or smartphones or older people. In-person events were only held in big cities and did not reach those who live in smaller towns and villages. Participants also mentioned that there is a ‘lack of faces’ or emotions in Thai AMR messaging. Lastly, due to a lack of evaluation it is not known to what extend these communication or engagement efforts achieved their target objectives.

3) Social norms around taking and requesting antibiotics

All conversation events saw a lot of discussion around social norms. In Thailand, self-medication is practised broadly. When ill, many people buy medication at pharmacies or informal drug stores. Many people also mentioned that they themselves or someone they know share medications. Participants said many older people stop taking medications after their symptoms disappear, and often keep the unfinished medications for future use, either for themselves or for their families. Healthcare professionals mentioned that patients who see them in the clinic or hospital expect to be given some medication, even if the ailment is self-limiting. Doctors and pharmacists are also quick to prescribe antimicrobials for self-limiting ailments. Some participants referred to this an ‘addiction to antibiotics’. Others attributed it to lack of basic health literacy. Participants also mentioned that it is customary and polite, and even caring to ask friends and family members if they have taken any medication when they feel unwell.

4) Availability of antimicrobials, limited monitoring and enforcement

Participants confirmed that antimicrobials can be easily obtained from doctors and other healthcare workers in government hospitals and clinics. They said that most antimicrobials can be dispensed by licensed pharmacists at pharmacies without a prescription from a qualified doctor. They added that pharmacies are widely available and antibiotics are inexpensive. Participants mentioned that generally there is limited enforcement of the regulations. Antibiotics are also sold illegally at grocery stores, mobile grocers and informal drug stores. Participants confirmed that it was not difficult to buy ‘yaa chud’, which usually contains an antibiotic, a steroid, and an antipyretic, e.g. paracetamol, packed together in small unlabelled plastic bags. They are cheap to buy and easily available in village stores, but their quality is not assured. Participants also mentioned that antibiotics are used widely in poultry, fish farms, veterinary sector and agriculture. In some cases, animal grade antibiotics are repackaged and sold for human consumption.

Co-created solutions: four locally actionable ‘building blocks’

In the course of the Conversation events, we collected many suggestions for potential solutions. Here we report only suggestions related to communications and engagement according to the scope of our project, which aimed to inform Strategy 5 (public knowledge and awareness of appropriate use of antimicrobials) of the NSP-AMR, and solutions actionable by the participants themselves. We outline four ‘building blocks’ of locally actionable solutions that participants suggested (detailed in Box 1):

  • Messages around AMR should be clear and tailored to the target audience, and more frequent

  • More initiatives to increase general health literacy

  • Increased availability of AMR-related information at the local level

  • Increased local leadership of AMR mitigation efforts

Discussion

Thailand has made significant progress in improve its public health system,29 including efforts to mitigate the problem of AMR, such as establishing the Thailand National Strategic Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance 2017-2022 22,23. The Thai NSP-AMR has six strategies 23. Our project aimed at informing Strategy 5, which at the time of the project focused on increasing public awareness of AMR; in the new NSP-AMR 2023-2027, Strategy 5 changed the focus to AMR literacy.

Our series of conversations confirmed some of the problem and drivers of AMR already known from other studies and the Thai national household surveys, for example that antimicrobials are still widely available including ‘yaa chud’ 15,30-32, and that there is still quite a lot of misunderstanding around antimicrobials 16,17,23,31,32. Our findings, in line with other studies, demonstrate the importance of community involvement and co-production in developing and implementing strategies to tackle AMR at a local level and promote community ownership 31,33.

In terms of solutions, participants suggested some changes to the current approaches to mitigate AMR. They recommended that communication messages regarding AMR should be concise, materials should be eye-catching and customized for the intended audience, there should be more programmes aimed at improving general health literacy, and local communities should have greater access to AMR-related information. This echoes what previously has been suggested by other studies: address the confusion between antibiotics and anti-inflammatories, explain the consequences of antibiotic overuse and misuse, e.g. for viral infections, include the importance of sanitation and hygiene 32,34-37, and tailor messages to the local context and specific misconceptions within a country 38.

The most striking finding was that many thought that local leadership should play a more prominent role in efforts to mitigate AMR, and mitigation strategies should take into consideration local culture. Participants suggested that in some places, AMR awareness and related projects should be combined with entertainment, whereas in other places, where community networks are strong (e.g. southern Thailand), projects should be embedded within existing networks and the primary health system, to address implementation gaps of the strategy.

Our project had several strengths and limitations (Table 2). One of the most notable outcomes of the geographical approach was that in some of the regional conversations, participants suggested low-hanging and locally actionable suggestions that they can initiate in their communities. In fact, a few informal local groups formed to organise local events after the conversation events (Box 2).

View this table:
Table 2: Strengths and limitations of the project and their potential implications.

Conclusion

The conversations using the ‘Responsive Dialogues’ approach unearthed many local issues and produced four ‘building blocks’ of locally actionable solutions. Our findings will be relevant to those who would like to involve communities and other stakeholders in their work, those who create tools or interventions for uptake by communities or local authorities, organisations who produce communication materials for increasing AMR or health literacy, and those looking for tangible policy solutions at a local level.

Grant information

This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust [221616]. The Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit is core funded by the Wellcome Trust [220221].

Competing interests statement

The authors declare no competing interest

Data availability

Data underlying the paper may be requested from the Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Data Access Committee. (email: datasharing{at}tropmedres.ac)

Author contributions

PYC wrote the first draft of the paper and raised the funding. PYC, AO, DL, CT, NKA and TP designed the project. TP was the overall project manager. TP, RP, SK, CT, KS, NKA, RP and KB facilitated the conversation events. BN led the analysis of the findings and evaluation. NKA, DL, NS and SP provided input and guidance on the alignment of the project with the Thailand National Strategic Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance. KB created the illustrations. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the protocol. PYC is the principal investigator and the guarantor of the paper.

Box 1:

The four co-created ‘building blocks’ of solutions to tackle AMR and detailed recommendations from the conversation events

Messages around AMR should be clear and tailored to the target audience

  • ⇒ Tailor information materials according to target audience.

  • ⇒ Adapt messages according to context and use the local dialect, or illustrations suitable for the target group.

  • ⇒ Messaging should use channels preferred by the target group (e.g. with youth groups, social media platforms are most popular).

  • ⇒ Materials should preferably be informed by communications and behaviour change research and tested with the target group before roll-out.

  • ⇒ Embed monitoring and evaluation in communication and engagement initiatives. In some communities, it may be useful to engage community influencers or leaders to pass on the knowledge.

More initiatives to increase general health literacy

  • ⇒ Instead of only focusing messaging on antimicrobials and AMR, there should be a move to increase holistic health literacy, which includes sanitation, nutrition and wellness.

  • ⇒ Incorporate AMR and health literacy in the school curriculum and informal learning centres for adults.

Increased availability of AMR-related information at the local level

  • ⇒ Participants at the local level, such as village health volunteers and healthcare staff at the primary care level, would like AMR-related information to be ‘returned to the community’. These include local data on usage of antimicrobials, deaths due to drug resistant infections and stories at local level. This way, they can make better informed decisions in relation to antimicrobial usage and provide information to their communities.

Increased local ownership of AMR mitigation efforts

  • ⇒ Support shared leadership and increased local leadership in mitigating the problem of AMR.

  • ⇒ Community leaders are best placed to create awareness and share knowledge on health and AMR because they know how to engage with their own community.

  • ⇒ Local level administration is more permanent than higher level administration and politicians, and there are shorter command chains to implement any activities or programmes.

  • ⇒ Local leaders can establish their own AMR task force and community surveillance on unauthorised sales of antimicrobials. This concept is called bo-worn in Thai, which means sublime, heavenly or great. Bo-worn consists of three parts, bo, wo and ro which is short for baan (house or for this context means community or group); wat (temple, mosque or church which are places of warship) and rong-rean (school and educational institutions). This concept has been used widely to promote and strengthen local networks to address local issues in a sustainable way44 45.

  • ⇒ Participants said they themselves will find opportunities to raise awareness of AMR in the communities. These include local talks, information sessions and in-person, one-on-one ‘heart-to-heart’ conversations (Embedded Image(jap khao kooi)”.

  • ⇒ Solutions should take into consideration the culture and preferences of engagement of each region:

    • Northern region: folk story telling

    • North-eastern region: fun and light-hearted activities

    • Southern region: family or community-based activities

    • Central region and other urban areas: social media.

Box 2:

List of informal local groups and events that participants organised after attending the conversation events.

  • Northern region: Khun Yuam Hospital, Mae Hong Son province, in collaboration with informal school to teach AMR to parents and older people at “Elderly School” in March 2022.

  • Southern region: The village health volunteers (VHV) from Pattani and Pattalung Province brought AMR as topic to their VHV monthly meeting in April 2022.

  • Central region: The village health volunteer leader from the Klong Toey slum requested an AMR expert to provide training on basic AMR knowledge for village health volunteers in Bangkok’s Klong Toey slum in July 2022.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all of the participants in our conversation events for their insightful contributions, and for taking the time to attend our sessions. We thank members of the Bangkok Health Research Ethics Interest Group for their input in the development of the project. We also thank Lucy McDowell, Zaichen Mallace-Lu and Jo Zaremba for their support and intellectual input throughout the duration of the project.

Abbreviations

AMR
Antimicrobial resistance
NSP-AMR
Thailand National Strategic Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Prestinaci F, Pezzotti P, Pantosti A. Antimicrobial resistance: a global multifaceted phenomenon. Pathog Glob Health 2015;109(7):309–18. doi: 10.1179/2047773215y.0000000030 [published Online First: 20150907]
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. Reygaert WC. An overview of the antimicrobial resistance mechanisms of bacteria. AIMS Microbiol 2018;4(3):482–501. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.3.482 [published Online First: 20180626]
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Pulingam T, Parumasivam T, Gazzali AM, et al. Antimicrobial resistance: Prevalence, economic burden, mechanisms of resistance and strategies to overcome. Eur J Pharm Sci 2022;170:106103. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2021.106103
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    Murray CJL, Ikuta KS, Sharara F, et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. The Lancet 2022;399(10325):629–55. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Adebisi YA. Balancing the risks and benefits of antibiotic use in a globalized world: the ethics of antimicrobial resistance. Globalization and Health 2023;19(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-00930-z
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Jamrozik E,
    2. Selgelid M
    Littmann J, Viens AM, Silva DS. The super-wicked problem of antimicrobial resistance. In: Jamrozik E, Selgelid M, eds. Ethics and Drug Resistance: Collective Responsibility for Global Public Health. Cham: Springer International Publishing 2020:421–43. Available from: doi:10.1007/978-3-030-27874-8_262020.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    Varadan SR, Chandler CIR, Weed K, et al. A just transition for antimicrobial resistance: planning for an equitable and sustainable future with antimicrobial resistance. The Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01687-2
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    The World Bank. The World Bank in Thailand 2023 [Available from: https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/thailand accessed 4th May 2023.
  9. ↵
    Worldometer. Thailand Population 2023 [Available from: https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/thailand-population/ accessed 4th May 2023.
  10. ↵
    Lim C, Takahashi E, Hongsuwan M, et al. Epidemiology and burden of multidrug-resistant bacterial infection in a developing country. Elife 2016;5 doi: 10.7554/eLife.18082 [published Online First: 2016/09/07]
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Lim C, Teparrukkul P, Nuntalohit S, et al. Excess mortality attributable to hospital-acquired antimicrobial-resistant infections: a 2-year prospective surveillance study in Northeast Thailand. Open Forum Infect Dis 2022;9(9):ofac305. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac305 [published Online First: 20220620]
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    Limmathurotsakul D, Sandoe JAT, Barrett DC, et al. ‘Antibiotic footprint’ as a communication tool to aid reduction of antibiotic consumption. J Antimicrob Chemother 2019;74(8):2122–27. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz185 [published Online First: 2019/05/11]
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. Wongsuvan G, Wuthiekanun V, Hinjoy S, et al. Antibiotic use in poultry: a survey of eight farms in Thailand. Bull World Health Organ 2018;96(2):94–100. doi: 10.2471/BLT.17.195834 [published Online First: 2018/02/07]
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. ↵
    World Health Organization (2018). WHO report on surveillance of antibiotic consumption: 2016-2018 early implementation. 2018.
  15. ↵
    Siltrakool B, Berrou I, Griffiths D, et al. Antibiotics’ use in Thailand: community pharmacists’ knowledge, attitudes and practices. Antibiotics (Basel) 2021;10(2) doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10020137 [published Online First: 20210131]
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    Chanvatik S, Kosiyaporn H, Lekagul A, et al. Knowledge and use of antibiotics in Thailand: A 2017 national household survey. PLoS One 2019;14(8):e0220990. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220990 [published Online First: 2019/08/10]
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Tangcharoensathien V, Chanvatik S, Kosiyaporn H, et al. Population knowledge and awareness of antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance: results from national household survey 2019 and changes from 2017. BMC Public Health 2021;21(1):2188. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12237-y
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    Denyer Willis L, Chandler C. Quick fix for care, productivity, hygiene and inequality: reframing the entrenched problem of antibiotic overuse. BMJ Glob Health 2019;4(4):e001590. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001590 [published Online First: 2019/09/10]
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Lambraki IA, Chadag MV, Cousins M, et al. Factors impacting antimicrobial resistance in the South East Asian food system and potential places to intervene: A participatory, one health study. Frontiers in Microbiology 2023;13 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.992507
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    Wellcome Trust 2021. Responsive Dialogues on drug resistant infections Version 2, 2021. Available from https://cms.wellcome.org/sites/default/files/2021-02/responsive-dialogues-drug-resistant-infections-tollkit.pdf. Accessed 8 June 2021.
  21. ↵
    Poomchaichote T, Osterrieder A, Prapharsavat R, et al. “AMR Dialogues”: a public engagement initiative to shape policies and solutions on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Thailand. Wellcome Open Res 2021;6:188. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17066.2 [published Online First: 20220407]
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    The Coordination and Integration Committee on Antimicrobial Resistance 2016 Thailand National Strategic Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance 2017-2021. Available from: https://rr-asia.woah.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/thailand_thailands-national-strategic-plan-on-amr-2017-2021.pdf accessed 4 September 2023 Access.
  23. ↵
    Sumpradit N, Wongkongkathep S, Malathum K, et al. Thailand’s national strategic plan on antimicrobial resistance: progress and challenges. Bull World Health Organ 2021;99(9):661–73. doi: 10.2471/blt.20.280644 [published Online First: 20210701]
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. ↵
    Sumpradit N., Krobanan K., Youngkong S., et al. (2019). Mapping and prioritization of research on antimicrobial resistance in Thailand. Food and Drug Administration, Ministry of Public Health. 2019.
  25. ↵
    Osterrieder A, Ruangkajorn S, Cheah PY. (2020) Terms of Reference for the Bangkok Health Research and Ethics Interest Group (HREIG). Zenodo. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4312633.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    Thirapantu Chaiwat, Sukrung Karnjariya, Poomchaichote Tassawan, et al. Agenda of Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) Dialogues in the North-eastern region of Thailand (1.0). 2023. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.83147712023.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. ↵
    Poomchaichote T, Boonthaworn K, Naemiratch B, et al. Summary of key findings of Antimicrobial Resistance Dialogues in Thailand (สปสาระสาคญจากโครงการเสวนาเอเชดยาในประเทศไทย) (1.0 date 20230611). 2023. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.80246562023.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. ↵
    Sumpradit N, Wongkongkathep S, Poonpolsup S, et al. New chapter in tackling antimicrobial resistance in Thailand. BMJ 2017;358:j3415. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j2423 [published Online First: 2017/09/07]
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Wibulpolprasert S, Fleck F. Thailand’s health ambitions pay off. Bull World Health Organ 2014;92(7):472–3. doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.030714
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. ↵
    Sunpuwan M, Punpuing S, Jaruruengpaisan W, et al. What is in the drug packet?: access and use of non-prescribed poly-pharmaceutical packs (Yaa Chud) in the community in Thailand. BMC Public Health 2019;19(1):971. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7300-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Arparsrithongsagul S, Kulsomboon V, Zuckerman IH. Multidisciplinary perspective intervention with community involvement to decrease antibiotic sales in village groceries in Thailand. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health 2015;27(2):NP2480–NP88. doi: 10.1177/1010539513479968
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Khamsarn S, Nampoonsak Y, Busamaro S, et al. Epidemiology of antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance in selected communities in Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai 2016;99(3):270–5.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    Mitchell J, Cooke P, Ahorlu C, et al. Community engagement: The key to tackling antimicrobial resistance (AMR) across a One Health context? Global Public Health 2022;17(11):2647–64. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2021.2003839
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. ↵
    Chanvatik S, Donnua S, Lekagul A, et al. Antibiotic use in mandarin production (Citrus reticulata Blanco) in major mandarin-producing areas in Thailand: A survey assessment. PLoS One 2019;14(11):e0225172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225172 [published Online First: 20191113]
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. Thamlikitkul V, Rattanaumpawan P, Boonyasiri A, et al. Operational actions of the Thailand antimicrobial resistance (AMR) containment and prevention program in response to the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Action Plan on AMR. Journal of Health Systems Research 2018;11(4)
  36. Haenssgen MJ, Charoenboon N, Zanello G, et al. Antibiotic knowledge, attitudes and practices: new insights from cross-sectional rural health behaviour surveys in low-income and middleincome South-East Asia. BMJ Open 2019;9(8):e028224. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028224 [published Online First: 20190820]
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Prapharsavat R, Lim C, Sunthornsut P, et al. The utility of an AMR dictionary as an educational tool to improve public understanding of antimicrobial resistance [version 1; peer review: 1 approved]. Wellcome Open Research 2021;6(113) doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16488.1
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. ↵
    Huttner B, Saam M, Moja L, et al. How to improve antibiotic awareness campaigns: findings of a WHO global survey. BMJ Global Health 2019;4(3):e001239. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001239
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. Poomchaichote T, Praphasavat R. Embedding public and community voices in shaping Thailand’s National Strategic Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance. 2022. Available from: https://youtu.be/DPc9oCqwJCo2022.
  40. Arnstein, S. (1969.) A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), 216–224. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8314771
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. Health Policy and Systems Research on Antimicrobial Resistance Network. Thailand’s One Health Report on antimicrobial consumption and antimicrobial resistance in 2019. 2021
  42. Tompson AC, Chandler CI (2021). Addressing antibiotic use: insights from social science around the world. Project report. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. 2021.
  43. King R, Hicks J, Rassi C, et al. A process for developing a sustainable and scalable approach to community engagement: community dialogue approach for addressing the drivers of antibiotic resistance in Bangladesh. BMC Public Health 2020;20(1):950. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09033-5
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  44. Jeena Y, Jeena R. “Ba Worn Santisook Project” : A participatory model of Home, Temple, School for promote morality of 12 values, Chiang Mai. Journal of MCU Peace Studies 2018;6(sp1):47–60.
    OpenUrl
  45. Phongrod Y, Limsiriwong S, Tana S, et al. Model development of participatory process in moving forward B.W.R. principle (Home, Temple, School) in order to build strong and sustainable communities: case Study of Ban Khlong Toei Community, Bueng Kok Sub-district, Bangrakam District, Phitsanulok Province. Humanities and Social Sciences Journal of Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University 2021;15(2):502–16. doi: 10.14456/psruhss.2021.38
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Back to top
Posted October 09, 2023.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email
Embedding community and public voices in co-created solutions to mitigate antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Thailand using the ‘Responsive Dialogues’ public engagement framework
Tassawan Poomchaichote, Niyada Kiatying-Angsulee, Kanpong Boonthaworn, Bhensri Naemiratch, Supanat Ruangkajorn, Ravikanya Praparsavath, Chaiwat Thirapantu, Karnjariya Sukrung, Direk Limmathurotsakul, Anne Osterrieder, Phaik Yeong Cheah
medRxiv 2023.10.06.23296658; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.06.23296658
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area