Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of local evidence-ecosystems in which academia and practice in the Public Health Service (PHS) are interconnected. However, appropriate organizational structures and well-trained staff are lacking and evidence use in local public health decision-making has to be integrated into training programs in Germany. To address this issue, we developed a toolbox to conceptualize training programs designed to qualify public health professionals for working at the interface between academia and practice. We conducted a scoping review of training programs, key-informant interviews with public health experts, and a multi-professional stakeholder workshop and triangulated their output. The toolbox consists of four core elements, encompassing 15 parameters: (1) content-related aspects, (2) context-related aspects, (3) aspects relevant for determining the training format, and (4) aspects relevant for consolidation and further development. Guiding questions with examples supports the application of the toolbox. The developed seven-step frame-work aims to facilitate new training programs for knowledge-transfer at the academia-practice interface, equipping public health researchers and practitioners with relevant skills for needs-based PHS research. The joint development of training approaches can foster cross-institutional collaboration and enhance evidence utilization, resulting in long-term resource savings and a stronger evidence base for implementing complex public health measures on site. In this way, co-development of tailored solutions within the local evidence ecosystem has the potential to enhance both scientific and practical impact.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The project is part of the funding priority "Strengthening Collaboration between Public Health Services and Public Health Research" of the Federal Ministry of Health and was funded by the federal government Germany.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and data collection was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Faculty of Medicine at the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, protocol code 2021-1646_1 (2021-12-16).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵^ Membership of the EvidenzÖGD study consortium is provided in the acknowledgments
