Abstract
Background Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as an accurate real-time biomarker of disease status across most solid tumor types. Most studies evaluating the utility of ctDNA have focused on time points weeks to months after surgery, which for many cancer types, is significantly later than decision-making time points for adjuvant treatment. In this systematic review, we summarize the state of the literature on the feasibility of using ctDNA as a biomarker in the immediate postoperative period.
Methods We performed a systematic review evaluating the early kinetics, defined here as three days, of ctDNA in patients who underwent curative-intent surgery across several cancer types.
Results Among the 2057 studies identified, we evaluated eight cohort studies with ctDNA levels measured within the first three days after surgery. Across six different cancer types, all studies showed an increased risk of cancer recurrence in patients with a positive early postoperative ctDNA level.
Discussion While ctDNA clearance kinetics appear to vary based on tumor type, across all studies-detectable ctDNA after surgery was predictive of recurrence, suggesting early post-operative timepoints could be feasibly used for determining minimal residual disease. However, larger studies need to be performed to better understand the precise kinetics of ctDNA clearance across different cancer types as well as to determine optimal postoperative time points.
Synopsis This systematic review analyzed the use of ctDNA as a biomarker for minimal residual disease detection in the early postoperative setting and found that ctDNA detection within three days after surgery is associated with an increased risk of recurrence.
Competing Interest Statement
Daniel Faden has received research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Calico, In Kind funding from Boston Gene and Predicine, holds equity in Illumina, and receives consulting fees from Merck, Noetic, Chrysalis Biomedical Advisors and Focus.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data availability statement for the work
All data generated and analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
