Acceptability and sustainability of a point-of-care HPV ‘self-collect, screen-and-treat’ for cervical cancer prevention in Papua New Guinea: A qualitative exploration of key informants’ perspectives

Perceived impact of HPV STAT

A key discussion point in the interviews was cervical cancer’s insidious nature. The lack of accessible and culturally congruent prevention services meant that women were dying early, and most often experienced a physically and emotionally painful period of isolation in the later stages of the disease due to the lack of treatment options. All key informants highlighted the imminent need for effective and culturally sensitive preventive services against cervical precancer and cancer. They perceived HPV STAT (‘the program’) as a social and clinical necessity to reduce the burden of disease nationally. They emphasized that the program, as designed, addresses numerous socio-cultural and systemic barriers that have hindered women from participating in previous programs.

Another major cultural impact of the program is the self-collection of vaginal swabs, which was identified as having a significant impact on women’s willingness to participate in screening. Earlier strategies based on Pap test collection or VIA examination required all women to undergo a pelvic examination which are poorly accepted due to embarrassment, discomfort, and cultural contexts. When we did the VIA [visual inspection with acetic acid], the mothers got scared like they were ashamed because of our customs and all these things. They wouldn’t just come and open themselves up for anybody to see them; they were a bit ashamed to come. But today when we are saying that you will do your self-collection, a lot of mothers are coming up to do that. They feel more comfortable in that way. (Marjorie, health care worker, 22 years of experience)

With the availability of self-collection, women have become even more active in their own care, while at the same time becoming more self-aware of their bodies. I see that [self-collection] has really encouraged women to come forward because they are getting the specimen by themselves which they feel more comfortable and also, we respect their privacy. They are empowered and they take ownership of their own health, of their own well-being. I see that, that’s very good, excellent idea because like I said previously, they don’t want to show themselves to other people. (Eloise, health care worker, 20 years of experience)

In previous Pap test programs, several barriers contributed to most women being lost to follow-up: the financial burden of transportation costs for frequent travel to the clinic (i.e., visit for the screening, and return for the results and ongoing care), as well as delays in receiving their Pap test results. The single visit (same day) point-of-care strategy allows for women to be tested and treated on the same day, greatly reducing loss to follow-up, opportunity costs, and promoting participation in screening. Senior health care workers and policymakers recognised that the women-led program provides the directions, guidelines on how the country should move forward in managing the disease. Cervical cancer is becoming more common. This is an emerging disease that is killing a lot of women in Papua New Guinea. So, when you think about something that could actually save young girls and women from dying of a very high-risk disease… that is simple, portable, scalable, women-led… we like it! (Jaden, policymaker, 20 years of experience)

Leveraging health education

These one-hour sessions create an environment where women become more fully informed about the service. This was an opportunity for health care workers to address individual concerns and misunderstandings of/about the screen-and-treat procedure, such as seeking clarification about the self-collection procedure, timing of results, and how to prevent cervical cancer in the future.

A few caveats were raised by health care workers around the introduction of HPV as a causative agent for cervical cancer. Despite attending the health education sessions, a few women continued to believe that a positive HPV test meant they had cervical cancer. When discussing this issue in their interviews, some health care workers stressed the importance of clarifying the difference between testing positive for HPV and being diagnosed with cervical cancer to avoid any misunderstandings and conflation of the two. At first when we started doing it, those who tested positive were saying ‘I have cancer’, and they think that we can’t kill that cancer, but when they come back, we said, ‘No, this is not cancer.’ The women who came after, we explain to them that if you have that virus, it doesn’t mean that you have cervical cancer. Just a virus is there, you don’t necessarily have cervical cancer. (Jaylene, health care worker, 13 years of experience)

Having received thermal ablation to treat the precancerous lesions, women who had tested positive for HPV and undergone same day treatment were advised to abstain from vaginal intercourse for six weeks. Abstinence is recommended to minimize the side effects of the thermal ablation and promote cervical healing. According to key informants, for some of the women, this post-care requirement created mistrust with their partners/husbands. To date men have not attended the Well Women’s Clinic and have therefore not been privy to the health education talks that explain this medical necessity for abstinence. The underlying reason for needing to abstain –and to promote the healing process – is the issue that causes most of the tension in relationships.

A naming dilemma: HPV testing or cervical cancer screening?

Both health care workers and policymakers raised the importance of finding the correct way to ‘name’ or ‘describe’ the service and viewed it as an opportunity to reduce the stigma around HPV and cervical screening. In Papua New Guinea, discussions around topics such as sex, sexually transmitted infections (STI), or the reproductive system can be highly stigmatized. Thus, naming the testing service provided is of cultural significance and would profoundly impact acceptability and uptake. The majority of health care workers and policymakers believed that the testing (should be referred to as ‘cervical screening’ or ‘HPV testing’, albeit they acknowledged that calling it HPV testing could be considered an important step in the right direction and would help lessen any dissonance in communication pertaining to the service. Using HPV testing is bold because people have to know that HPV causes cervical cancer. It’s like people are going for HIV testing. Now, we’ll have to say that HPV testing is available too. (Janelle, health care worker, 2 years of experience)

While the use of ‘HPV testing’ may be considered ‘bold’, some cautioned that it is important to be sensitive and responsive to the stigma associated with HPV being an STI and to the diverse cultural realities of each province in the country. We need to be sensitive that what works in one province, may need tweaking for it to be acceptable somewhere else. As long as we stick to the core things of it being something that is going to avoid deaths from cervical cancer, it is a hard message to argue with. Now, how you might talk about that STD part of HPV, to me, would be to dilute it, because the other message [preventing deaths] is so incredibly powerful. (Mayna, policymaker, 23 years of experience)

Perceptions of HPV STAT’s point-of-care technologies

As part of the program, health care workers operated a diagnostic point-of-care technology to test for the presence of hr-HPV DNA. Trust in the diagnostic technology is apparent from discussions with both health care workers and policymakers. All health care workers were confident in the use of the GeneXpert platform including its accuracy. Most felt that the use of this closed molecular platform was more accurate than previous screening methods such as VIA.

Health care workers also acknowledged the quick result turnaround time of results using the GeneXpert, noting that it allows for same day screen-and-treat. Most health care workers noted the key aspects of time and speed, which help to address the high loss to follow-up rates experienced with past Pap test programs.

All health care workers who have operated the HPV testing platform said that it was easy to use. The testing platform interprets the results for the user, provides the exact HPV type(s) detected in the sample, and also indicates when there is an issue with the sample (i.e., not enough sample in the cartridge prompting for more sample collection). Similarly, policymakers agreed that the machine is ‘very effective and efficient’. Policymakers also commented on the machine’s mobility, alluding that it can be transported into hard-to-reach (rural) areas, where access to cervical screening remains a challenge.

The addition of the precancerous treatment option on the same day was seen as an advantage. All health care workers viewed the thermal ablation procedure as quick and effective. …with this [intervention], they come in and then they get the results on the same day and it’s possible they get treatment on the same day as well. That [same day screen-and-treat] would be our greatest benefit to the women. (Jeffrey, health care worker, 16 years of experience)

Teamwork and Training

Staff at both WWC saw their role and the role of others in their team as equally important. The effective teamwork stemmed from the clear delineation of roles as well as task sharing. The ’test and treat’ technologies are easy to use, allowing less skilled staff to operationalize Xpert, while also leading health education sessions, and counselling the women throughout the clinical pathway. The health care workers took particular pride in providing post-testing counselling, seeing it as a significant role in the women’s experience of HPV STAT.

The training model is one of coaching and supervision. Training consists of newly hired staff, namely health extension officers and nurses, observing the most experienced health care workers and being coached to perform all the steps. Task-shifting is an important advantage of this intervention as all health care workers directly involved are health extension officers and/or nurses, emphasizing the importance of their role in the intervention and in the Papua New Guinean health system. The coaching and supervision scheme promotes a mentoring environment. The staff felt supported by one another, creating a trusting work environment. The staff felt empowered, not only through the use of the Xpert platforms but the role they each led and being viewed as champions in their clinical and social environments. Policymakers suggested that a similar coaching strategy should be used during scale-up to empower clinic staff, to optimize on resources, and to create a supportive environment for all team members. It seems to me that one of the biggest reasons this is going really well is the passion and engagement [staff members] bring to our program. That’s going to mean that we don’t just take our staff out of here, but we’ve got to grow someone like them in other places and bring that person here for training, and then do the same thing again somewhere else. (Mayna, policymaker, 23 years of experience)

Clinical Space

According to all health care workers, the clinical space was well organized. Standard operating procedures and other key documentation were available and well within reach of the staff. The clinical algorithm posters were helpful to refer to when having conversations with the women regarding the intervention. Nonetheless, the majority of health care workers suggested improvements in a few areas. The size of the clinic was deemed too small. Due to the high uptake, there was no adequate space for the women to sit and wait for their results. At times, the women were too close to one another and could hear the other’s results during their post-test counselling. As much as the health care workers would attempt to ensure confidentiality during those sessions, the limited space made it challenging. These women are just sitting close to each other… we are sitting too close to interview clients, and we need to keep their privacy. So, they’re sitting close, and the others are listening on the other side, it is not good. When we give results, others are still listening. They’ll go back and say this woman has that virus or something. We need to keep things confidential. (Jaylene, health care worker, 13 years of experience)

As part of the program and to ensure women’s privacy, a private space was dedicated to the self-collection procedure and for women needing thermal ablation. Health care workers also acknowledged the value of the dedicated private space for self-collection and the thermal ablation procedure as part of the program. Similarly to the post-result counselling sessions, health care workers emphasised the need for a larger clinical space in order to accommodate the women and ensure privacy for these procedures. Moreover, the limited availability of a cervical screening program in Papua New Guinea has left a void that HPV STAT is filling. Most health care workers predicted an uptake due to increased awareness (i.e., word of mouth), high acceptability, and immense need. It was suggested that, when considering the impact the service could have on Papua New Guinea women long term, the service should have a space of their own to respond to the demand. If the hospitals all were willing to sustain the services, I think they should have a building of its own so there’s enough space, because it’s a service in demand for women in the province. (Jenny, health care worker, 17 years of experience)

Mobilizing necessary resources

Due to high acceptability of the program, health care workers underscored the need to hire for more staff to sustain the service. Some of the health care workers suggested to train nurses, health extension officers, and midwives currently working at the hospital, as a short-term remedy. The staff ratio to the number of women is overwhelming. For this particular clinic, even with the two nurses that we have at the clinic, we are trying to strategize with the numbers, but we are still overwhelmed with the numbers. The nurses to patient ratio is still an extremely big gap. We can’t match it. We might need additional help from other departments as a start. (Jeffrey, health care worker, 16 years of experience)

Political support

The introduction of HPV STAT prompted discussions about the need for a comprehensive national cervical cancer prevention strategy including all preventive measures (i.e., HPV vaccination, cervical screening, cervical cancer treatment services) to be made available to the public. Policymakers stressed the importance of supporting the implementation of all three pillars of the WHO cervical cancer elimination strategy. Yet, in order to see significant gains in cervical cancer elimination nationally, it will require all pillars for sustained improved health outcomes in the long term. Actualising this requires strong political support, notably political will, and direction. This will ensure oversight of the infrastructure and logistics required to sustain the program, such as the purchase of testing and treatment equipment, and key consumables (i.e., cartridges). We will have to build that into the annual plan. There are some definite plans in place, but that’s for the hospital. We have to take it right across the province then. We need good political will and directions from people higher up. They can get involved in the infrastructure and logistics side of it and buy the machines and sustain the service with getting its consumables like the cartridges and things like that. (Carl, senior policymaker, 22 years of experience)

Some respondents advocated for leadership at the provincial or national level to ensure more coordinated effort to sustain HPV STAT. The program needs a full-time person to coordinate and develop this. Bring everybody together and run a full cervical cancer screening clinic for the province as a whole. Everyone is busy with all the other responsibilities. So, to really scale it up across the province, that would be really nice if we can do it… even nationally. With good political direction and will, well-coordinated and a focal person, we can lead and sustain the program. (Roger, senior health care worker, 14 years of experience)

Financing realities

The cost and affordability of HPV STAT were raised by both health care workers and policymakers. The current service is provided free of charge. While working women may be in a financial position to pay in full or at least cost share as the program is taken to scale, it was recognized that for the majority of women in Papua New Guinea this would not be possible. Yet, both health care workers and policymakers recognized that it is essential to charge for the service if it needs to be sustained. Senior-level health care workers and policymakers emphasized that an effective financial strategy would allow the purchasing and maintenance of supplies and (extra) GeneXpert machines essential to respond to the demand generated with the introduction of the service. To really have an effective and sustainable program, women will have to be charged. I would think that 60 Kina would be sufficient. 50 Kina is for cartridge. That extra 10 Kina will be for treatment and many unseen costs that would be incurred. But that’s from the top of my head. I don’t want it to be so hard for the families. But at the same time, I don’t want to be so cheap, and we struggle and close down the clinic. So, this could be a balance. And if we have a reasonable balance like that, we ask the local MPs or the government to support it, and we can just try it that way to start. (Peter, policymaker, 25 years of experience)