Occupational Health Management in New Work – a Protocol for a Mixed-Method Study: Project BGM4NewWork

Introduction

Even before the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been transformations in the world of work towards agile, flexible, democratic, and digital forms of work, so called New Work (NW). NW is used as a term in multiple and heterogeneous ways; however, there is still no consensus on a uniform definition. It can be seen as a “container term”; a construct which is sometimes arbitrarily expanded or reduced [1]. Its original meaning can be traced back to Bergmann [2], who argued that people used to serve work. In the sense of today’s understanding of NW, however, work should serve the people. This “inversion” is central to understanding NW. Accordingly, NW can offer the opportunity to strengthen the resources of employees.

External, global, and local factors influence the NW transformation. In addition to globalization and climate change, the COVID-19 pandemic also acted as a catalyst for developments towards NW. Clear effects can be seen, for example, with regard to digitalization. Companies introduced NW measures, such as new digital and virtual tools, as this enables companies to improve their performance and actively adapt to the transformation process and external global factors [3]. A growing number of employees around the world were increasingly working in NW settings. This sudden change of work settings due to the pandemic was unprepared and led to various inconveniences for the workers such as unprepared desktop environment and a lack of information tools [4]. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic led to increased locational flexibility, such as working from home (WFH). Prior to the pandemic, more than half of German employees had the option WFH—an opportunity that often remained unused [5]. The COVID-19 pandemic increased the proportion of employees WFH from 12% to up to 35% [6] and this trend continues—in 2021, 24.8% of the workforce in Germany worked from home occasionally and 10% daily [7]. The changes toward NW extend beyond the end of the COVID-19 pandemic. The trend for WFH apparently continues and will shape the future of work. In a study examining researchers’ experience of WFH, 66% want to increase their time WFH compared to their time WFH before the COVID-19 pandemic [8]. In summary, the pandemic has forced the world of work to make rapid changes towards NW, and this rapid change has led to longer-term movements towards more flexible and digital forms of work.

This movement in the world of work has a wide range of effects on employees and their health. Health effects resulting from new forms of work, such as flexible forms of work in terms of time and place, are the subject of controversial debates [9, 10]. In a systematic review, Lunde et al. [11] examined health outcomes of WFH including pain, well-being, overall-health, and burnout. They found both studies with positive effects and studies with negative effects on employee health. For example, Anderson et al. [12] examined, that employees reported higher positive affective well-being on days WFH. Furthermore, WFH was found to be associated with lower symptoms of depression in mothers with young children [13], as well as with a reduction in stress [14, 15]. Additionally, WFH can increase concentration and reduce work interruptions [16] and employees might experience an improved work-life balance while WFH [17]. On the other hand, Lunde et al. [11] also examined studies that found negative effects of WFH on health parameters. Song and Gao [18] reported an association of higher stress levels with WFH; other studies found no association between WFH and general health [19, 20]. In a study of German employees, a higher proportion of WFH was found to be associated with stress-related symptoms [21]. However, aspects such as high functionality of technical equipment while WFH showed positive effects on employee health [21]. Nonetheless, flexible work in the form of WFH can also increase back pain, lead to weight gain [22] and correlate with sleep quality [23] as well as psychosocial problems, e.g., cabin fever, isolation, and loss of concentration [24]. Moreover, other NW settings such as perceived flexibility at work can counterbalance negative effects of organizational, individual, and psychosocial factors of work-life balance [25]. Overall, there are ambivalent associations regarding the health of employees in NW settings; health-promoting as well as health-endangering effects are empirically supported.

Occupational health management (OHM) aims to maintain and improve the long-term health of employees at the individual and collective level [26]. OHM includes sustainable, systematic, and holistic measures of organizational and process design and takes all relevant interactions of work and health into account [27]. The spatial and temporal diversification of work (e.g., through WFH, coworking, and flexible working hours) as well as constant accessibility due to advanced digitalization pose challenges to the world of work and to OHM. Previous OHM approaches are not sufficiently tailored to forms of NW [28]. As the health effects of NW settings are not sufficiently studied, the requirements for the design of efficient OHM structures within these NW settings remain unclear. However, studies on these issues are essential, because most employees want to continue working in NW settings after the abrupt changes caused by COVID-19 and not return to pre-pandemic structures.

Examining health effects of NW and designing efficient OHM structures is a main aim of the project BGM4NewWork. OHM services should be demand-oriented. Because needs and risk factors are ambivalent across different NW settings and for different subgroups of employees, we will examine subgroups extracted from the empirical data using cluster analyses. The aim is to derive recommendations for action for OHM that are oriented toward the needs of employees in the corresponding subgroups and take into account the risks, benefits and protective factors of work in the specific subgroups of NW settings. The project BGM4NewWork is a third party funded consortium project with the partner UseTree GmbH (UseTree). UseTree focuses on the introduction of agile, human-centered work processes in companies and supports the development of holistic, innovative product solutions in the digital field. In addition, the project is supported by partners from cooperatives, health insurance companies, and business associations, among others.

The overall goal is to synthesize the data of all substudies of the project. This evidence synthesis will be used to develop a checklist based on subgroups of NW settings and associated health risks, benefits, and protective factors. This BGM4NW-Checklist will be used to derive suitable, needs-oriented OHM services. Accordingly, already implemented OHM services are compared with the current needs of employees in NW settings, and impulses for new or modified OHM services will be derived. We therefore aim to contribute to closing the described gaps in health care in NW settings. In addition, requirements and obstacles of OHM services and challenges of access and interfaces between and within sectors and providers will be identified. Based on an explorative mixed-method study design and thus on empirical foundation of qualitative (i.e., interviews and workshops) as well as quantitative data (questionnaire data), the following main research questions (RQ) will be addressed:

Method

We will conduct a prospective mixed-method design for our project, which is divided into four substudies (Fig 1) and is expected to take place between June 2022 and May 2025. Within the scope of our project, we focus on different effects of NW settings. Hence, we will identify associated health risks, benefits and protective factors in employee subgroups and finally derive recommendations for target group-specific OHM measures. All information provided here is based on the project plan. At the time of the publication of this study protocol, the project team was working on substudy 1.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1. Overview of Substudies and Aim

Materials and methods

In the following, the study design, procedures, and recruitment of participants in the substudies will be described. The evidence of all substudies will be synthesized in order to achieve the overall goal of developing the BGM4NW-Checklist. Each substudy involves different methods and data collection methods. Furthermore, the aims of substudies and interdependencies will be examined.

Data Analyses

All data will be processed by the research team. R-Studio and IBM SPSS Statistics (International Business Machines Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) will be used to analyze the quantitative questionnaire data. For all analyses, the significance level will be set at 0.05. Outliers will be checked manually. Plausibility checks will be performed to ensure data quality. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses will be performed to explore the research questions and test derived hypotheses. Cluster analyses will be used to synthesize the quantitative data to find subgroups of employees and NW settings. Qualitative data from interviews and workshops will be transcribed and subsequently analyzed using MAXQDA, following the approach of qualitative content analysis by Mayring [32]. The coding strategy combines deductive as well as inductive procedures.

Monitoring and Ethics

The project has been submitted to and approved by the ethics committee of Charité – Universitaetsmedizin Berlin (No. EA2/189/22). In addition, a data management plan for the study (including all substudies) was developed and reviewed by the Clinical-Trial-Officers from Charité. Only the research team will have access to the original data. All participants generate a code.

Consequently, it is no longer possible to assign data to individuals after the data have been pseudonymized. All participants in all substudies will give their informed consent before data collection. The invitations to participate explicitly state that participation is voluntary and that non-participation or drop-out will not have any negative consequences.

The project will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Guidelines of Good Epidemiologic Practice (GEP) of the International Epidemiological Association (IEA) and findings will be published in academic journals. Moreover, analyses and publications will be conducted in line with the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity, Revised Edition (2017) and the Guidelines for ensuring good scientific practice.

Conclusion

The project BGM4NewWork will follow a participatory multi-method design to develop an evidence-based checklist for target group-specific identification of NW settings and employee subgroups and their health risks, benefits, and protective factors. This aim will be addressed in four substudies, and the findings will be disseminated through publications in academic journals and multiplied by the involvement of project partners, i.e., OHM stakeholders. The knowledge of NW settings and employee subgroups, associated risks, accesses and barriers of OHM measures and the checklist will be used to maintain and improve the health of employees. Findings about target group-specific needs regarding OHM measures could inspire following intervention projects in the future.

Author Contributions

C.R., F.N., A.W. and S.V.-M. collaborated in the conception and implementation of this research project. C.R. and F.N. wrote the manuscript including figures. A.W. and S.V.-M. revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed, read, and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The publication of this manuscript and the BGM4NewWork project are externally funded by the Innovation Fund for the Promotion of Health Services Research (§ 92a paragraph 2 sentence 1 SGB V). The funding code is 01VSF21045. The funding is provided by the Innovation Committee of the Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss (G-BA), Postfach: 12 06 06, 10596 Berlin. The funding is for the period from 01.06.2022 to 31.05.2025. https://innovationsfonds.g-ba.de/projekte/versorgungsforschung/bgm4newwork-staerkung-der-praevention-in-unternehmen-mit-raeumlich-und-zeitlich-entgrenzten-digitalen-arbeitsformen.463

Availability of data and materials

To date, the data of the scoping review, semi-standardized inteviews, both online-questionnaires I and II are available. The further data collection has not yet started. Later, the data collected within this project can be requested from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The data will not be publicly available, as this was assured to the participants in the study information as well as in the privacy statement.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol is in line with the current version of the Declaration of Helsinki (2013) and therefore approved by the Ethics Committee of the Charité – Universitaetsmedizin Berlin (No. EA2/189/22).

Consent for publication

The article has not been published elsewhere. In addition, this manuscript is not considered for publication in another journal. All authors consent to the publication of this manuscript in PLOSone.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest. There is only an interest in the publication of this article. The funders had no influence on the design of the project and will have no influence on the analyses or interpretation of the data. In addition, they had no influence on the writing of the manuscript.