Mental health-related hospitalisations among adolescents with previous child protection contact from birth to age 11

Introduction

Mental health challenges among adolescents are a major public health issue. For instance, suicide is the leading cause of death among 15-24-year-olds in Australia.¹ Parent-or carer-reported estimates of “mental health disorders” from the 2013-14 Australian Child and Adolescent Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing indicated that 14.4% of 12-17-year-olds had a “mental health disorder” in the previous 12 months.² In the 2021 South Australian Population Health Survey, 19.7% of those aged 10-15, and 35.3% of adolescents aged 16-17 reported being told by a doctor that they had a “mental health condition” in the last 12-months.³ The COVID-19 pandemic may have exacerbated these mental health challenges.^{4, 5}

The scale of mental health challenges means that services for young people may be overwhelmed and under-resourced in Australia.⁶ The current primary care model only meets the mental health needs of a minority of young people, with many requiring more comprehensive and multidisciplinary approaches due to complex needs.⁷ This has a flow-on effect in the health system as adolescents may present to hospital for mental health challenges when other services are unavailable.⁶ The rise in mental health-related hospitalisations for adolescents could therefore be considered to relate to a lack of available care and social supports or simply as one relevant indicator of adolescent mental health. Between 2010-11 and 2020-21, overnight mental health-related hospitalisation rates nearly doubled from 35 to 62 hospitalisations per 10,000 population for those aged 12-17.⁸

Teicher et al. considers child maltreatment to be “the most important preventable risk factor for psychiatric disorders” based on population attributable fractions for a range of psychopathology types ranging from 30% to 67%.⁹ We know child protection system contact and child maltreatment is common. In Australia in 2020-21, there were 531,900 notifications of alleged maltreatment¹⁰; data from South Australia has shown 1 in 4 children have been the subject of a child protection notification by age 10; ¹¹ and in New South Wales 13.8% of children were notified to child protection services by age 5.¹² Previous research has provided some evidence of the association between child protection system contact, child maltreatment and mental health hospitalisations. In a South Australian study that described frequency and reasons for hospitalisation by lifetime child protection involvement, mental health was amongst the top three reasons for hospitalisation for 13-17-year-olds who had experienced out-of-home care but not for those who had no child protection system contact.¹³ A New South Wales study found children who were the subject of a report to child protection services by age 6 were more than twice as likely to be diagnosed with a mental health disorder during middle childhood (6-14 years) compared to children who had never had child protection system contact.¹⁴ Another study in Western Australia found that 20% of children with substantiated maltreatment had a mental health diagnosis compared to 3.6% of children with no child protection contact.¹⁵

There is an opportunity to understand how the association between child protection system contact and mental health hospitalisations impacts the hospital system. Our study has taken the perspective of the hospital system and focused on investigating the burden of mental health-related hospitalisations that come from adolescents with a history of child protection contact. This perspective is relevant to clinicians trying to understand the background characteristics of adolescents presenting to hospital for mental health reasons.

Our study used linked whole-of-population data to investigate the burden of mental health-related hospitalisations among adolescents aged 12-17 years in South Australia who experienced child protection system contact from ages 0-11. We first described the overlap in the populations of children with child protection contact up to age 11 and those who had experienced a mental health-related hospitalisation during adolescence from age 12-17. We then quantified the number of individuals with a mental health-related hospitalisation (person view) and the number of mental health-related hospitalisations (a hospital view), to examine the burden of mental health-related hospitalisations by levels of prior child protection system contact among adolescents with at least one hospitalisation.

Methods

Results

Box 2 shows that 3.2% (n=5,646) of all adolescents aged 12-17 had a mental health-related hospitalisation, and 15.5% (n=27,203/175,115) of all adolescents had a child protection history. The proportion of adolescents with a mental health-related hospitalisation increased as the level of child protection contact increased, from 2.3% of those with no contact, to 6.0% of those with a notification, and 17.5% of individuals who had experienced out-of-home care. This pattern was consistent across all categories of mental health diagnoses. For example, for mental and behavioural disorders related to substance use, 0.8% of adolescents with no child protection contact had a hospitalisation compared to 1.9% of those with a notification and 9.6% of those in out-of-home care. Similarly, for self-harm, 0.7% of adolescents with no child protection contact had a hospitalisation compared to 2.1% of those with a notification, and 5.8% of those in out-of-home care. Supplementary Table 2 shows 32.4% of adolescents hospitalised for mental health had recurrent mental health-related hospitalisations. The proportion of adolescents with a recurrent hospitalisation increased as the level of child protection contact increased, from 28.6% of those with no contact, to 34.8% of those with a notification and 49.3% of those who had experienced out-of-home care. Overall, 74.9% of mental health-related hospitalisations were transferred from casualty/emergency departments (Supplementary Table 3).

We examined mental health hospitalisations in terms of the number of adolescents with at least one hospitalisation (person view), and the number of hospitalisations (hospital view). Box 3 shows there were 5,646 adolescents who experienced a total of 10,633 mental health-related hospitalisations from ages 12-17. Taking a person view, we see that although adolescents with a child protection history comprised only 15.5% of the population of 12-17-year-olds (Box 2), they made up 40.4% of the 12-17-year-olds with at least one mental health hospitalisation (Box 3). Taking a hospitalisations view: 44.9% of all mental health-related hospitalisations for 12-17-year-olds were for adolescents with a history of child protection contact (Box 3); adolescents who had been substantiated for child maltreatment by age 11 but were not in out-of-home care, accounted for 12.1% of all adolescent mental health-related hospitalisations, while those who had experienced out-of-home care from ages 0-11 accounted for 5.3% of all adolescent mental health-related hospitalisations.

Box 4 takes a person view and shows that for those who had been hospitalised for any cause from ages 12-17, 14.9% had at least one mental health hospitalisation. The proportion of adolescents hospitalised for mental health, out of all adolescents hospitalised for any reason, increased with each level of child protection contact and was 3.3 times higher for adolescents who had experienced out-of-home care (39.1%) than adolescents with no contact (11.8%, Supplementary Table 4). This trend is consistent for each age, but is starkest at younger ages. For instance, for 17-year-olds the proportion with a mental health hospitalisation out of those hospitalised for any reason is 2.3 times higher for those who experienced out-of-home care compared to those with no child protection contact. However, the proportion with a mental health hospitalisation out of those hospitalised for any reason was 9.3 times higher for 12-year-olds with experience in out-of-home care than for 12-year-olds with no child protection system contact (Supplementary Table 4). This indicates that mental health is the reason for hospitalisation for a higher proportion of younger adolescents with out-of-home care experience than older adolescents with out-of-home care experience. Box 5 takes a hospitalisation view and shows the same pattern, with mental health diagnoses responsible for an increasing number of hospitalisations among younger adolescents and those with child protection contact.

Discussion

Children with child protection system contact from ages 0-11 accounted for 44.9% of all mental health-related hospitalisations among adolescents aged 12-17. Children with confirmed maltreatment (substantiated or out-of-home care) accounted for 17.4% of all adolescent mental health-related hospitalisations even though they comprised only 3.7% of the population aged 12-17. Among adolescents aged 12-17 who had at least one mental health-related hospitalisation, two in every five (40.4%) had previous child protection contact.

Our estimate that 3.2% of all adolescents had experienced a mental health-related hospitalisation was consistent with the Second Australian Child and Adolescent Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing that found 3.3% of 12-17-year-olds had a mental disorder that severely impacted social and educational functioning in 2013-2014.² Our study demonstrated that the out-of-home care population had the highest risk of mental health-related hospitalisations, with 17.5% of children who had experienced out-of-home care having at least one mental health-related hospitalisation in adolescence, which was consistent with previous Australian studies.^{14, 15} From the perspective of the hospital system, the proportion of all hospitalisations for adolescents aged 12-17 years that were mental health-related was higher for children who had experienced out-of-home care (39.5%) compared to adolescents with no child protection contact (10.7%). This comparison was more pronounced at younger ages, with the proportion of hospitalisations due to mental health being 9.3 times higher for 12-year-olds who experienced out-of-home care than for 12-year-olds with no child protection contact.

In 2020-21, SA Health and the Department for Child Protection signed an agreement reaffirming the prioritisation of health services for children in out-of-home care, including mental health services.²⁰ However, we know that children who most need mental health support are more likely to be turned away from services due to their complex needs that services cannot meet.²¹ The Royal Australasian College of Physicians position statement on the Health Care of Children in Care and Protection Services highlighted the need for specialist multidisciplinary services for “vulnerable” children and adolescents to deliver integrated mental health, primary and other specialised care, as well as the need for trauma-informed health care for children and adolescents in out-of-home care.²²

While this study indicates that priority access to mental health services is needed for children in out-of-home care, 39.6% of mental health-related hospitalisations are for adolescents who have had child protection system contact, but have not experienced out-of-home care. Even children who had only ever been notified to child protection were more than twice as likely to have a mental health hospitalisation. They also had a greater number of hospitalisations compared to those with no child protection contact. If mental health-related hospitalisations are to be reduced, mental health support services need to consider the heightened mental health needs of all children with child protection system contact, not just those in out-of-home care.²¹ As a broader system, we must also consider capacity to holistically address broader determinants of mental health such as poverty.^{23, 24} From a public health perspective, this means considering how we can provide early support before circumstances result in a mental health hospitalisation. Given the results of this study, child protection concerns may themselves be an indicator of need for early support.

This study excluded children not born in South Australia, although we would not expect the observed patterns identified to differ based on this. Additionally, private hospital data were not available. However, children in out-of-home care are unlikely to have private health cover unless it is funded by their carers.²⁵ This means that most children in out-of-home care rely on public health services and most mental health-related hospitalisations among this group would have been captured in this analysis.²⁵ This study also underestimated the total population burden of mental health challenges as we only use mental health-related hospitalisations as our measure of mental health challenges experienced by adolescents. However, given the similar magnitude of child protection contact across the life course in jurisdictions with different legislation and practice¹² and the similar burden of mental health hospitalisations,⁸ we expect these findings to be applicable across Australia.

This paper provides evidence of the cross-over between child protection and subsequent mental health-related hospitalisations that reflects what clinicians are experiencing in hospitals across Australia. Almost 45% of mental health-related hospitalisations are experienced by adolescents who had prior child protection system contact. Over 40% of adolescents hospitalised for mental health had previous child protection system contact. As this child protection contact is prior to the subsequent mental health-related hospitalisations, this presents an opportunity for prevention of mental health challenges and hospitalisations among adolescents.