Demographics, culture, and participatory nature of multi-marathoning – an observational study

L Lundy; R.B. Reilly

doi:10.1101/2023.09.17.23295665

Abstract

Objectives Completing 100 marathons defines a multi-marathoner.

The aim of this study was to document the sport of multi-marathoning and to report on the demographics, culture, and participatory nature of the sport.

Methods A survey was distributed globally to the sports participants. All the major national and international multi-marathon clubs supported the survey distribution via their closed social media and email groups. The survey was fully anonymous and online.

Results The survey attracted 830 respondents from 40 countries, with an average marathon completion count of 146 per respondent. 60% of respondents were men, with a respondent’s average age of over 50 years. Social life and travel superseded competitiveness as the main motivation as participants age. 57% of respondents had at least one contravention to a pre-participation screening questionnaire and 67% took pain relief medication around events. 93% of respondents reported that multi-marathoning was good for their mental health.

Discussion Multi-marathoning facilitates the older athlete, but there is a significant gender imbalance in participation. Long-term health damage potential is significant, and health awareness requires addressing by governing bodies, event facilitators and participants alike. Multi-marathoners should use available information from modern equipment to inform their health status and to optimise training.

Conclusion Recommendations from the study include implementing women-specific enhancements to events, race directors having adequately resourced health plans at events, and participants taking accountability for their own health by including proactive regular health management before and during their participation in the sport.

Summary Box

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC ⇒

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC ⇒ Much research has been published on marathoning over recent decades, but none of the published studies focused on the sport of multi-marathoning.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS ⇒

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS ⇒ Until now, absence of focused research has resulted in a lack of understanding of the demographics, culture, and participatory nature of the sport. This study is the first to provide this understanding.

HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY ⇒

HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY ⇒ Multi-marathon participants and those involved in multi-marathon governance, or in the running of multi-marathon events may utilise the results of this study to better plan their contribution to the sport and its overall safety, policies and organisation.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Faculty of Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee, Trinity College Dublin APPROVED

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes