Abstract
Cancer treatment has made significant advancements in recent decades, leading to improved outcomes and quality of life for many patients. Despite the array of available therapies, including targeted, hormone, and checkpoint blockade immunotherapy, many patients experience treatment failure or eventual resistance. Attempts to predict the efficacy of therapies, particularly immuno-oncology therapies, have suffered from limited accuracy and difficulties in identifying molecular and other determinants of response. Improving treatment prediction alone is insufficient to create clinically meaningful research tools; additional prerequisites for this goal involve accommodating small data sets, effectively handling sparse features, integrating diverse clinical data, addressing missing measurements, ensuring interpretability, and extracting valuable biological insights for both clinical context and further research. Multimodal deep-learning models offer a promising avenue to surmount these challenges by leveraging their capacity and flexibility to learn from expansive and varied clinical and molecular data sets. Similar to their application in natural language and other domains, deep-learning models can uncover complex relationships within data that are pertinent to survival and treatment response. In this study, we introduce an explainable transformer-based deep-learning framework that addresses these challenges. This framework yields predictions of survival outcomes, as quantified by concordance index, that surpass the performance of state-of-the-art methods such as Cox proportional hazards, survival random forest, and tumor mutation burden, across diverse independent data sets. We developed the clinical transformer, a deep neural-network survival prediction framework that capitalizes on the flexibility of the deep-learning model, including training strategies like gradual and transfer learning, to maximize the use of available data to enhance survival predictions and generate actionable biological insights. Finally, we illustrate the future potential of the clinical transformer’s generative capability in early-stage clinical studies. By perturbing molecular features associated with immune checkpoint inhibition treatment in immunotherapy-naive patient profiles, we identified a subset of patients who may benefit from immunotherapy. These findings were subsequently validated across three independent immunotherapy treatment cohorts. We anticipate that this research will empower the scientific community to further harness data for the benefit of patients.
Competing Interest Statement
All authors were / are employees of AstraZeneca at the time the research was performed and may hold stock ownership, options, or interests in the company.
Funding Statement
This work is fully funded by AstraZeneca
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of AstraZeneca gave ethical approval for this work (Mystic Clinical trial:)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, The University of Edinburgh, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.