Abstract
Introduction Avoidable mortality is widely used by public health researchers to measure population health, and many related methodologies have been proposed for doing so. This scoping review presents a comprehensive view of global peer-reviewed and grey literature exploring the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and avoidable mortality.
Methods We searched Ovid Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science to find articles that investigated SES inequalities in avoidable mortality. We limited our review to articles in English published between 2000 and 2020. For grey literature, we searched leading global and Canadian health information websites. We extracted data on different study characteristics, avoidable mortality definition, SES indicator, method of analysis of the association between avoidable mortality and SES, and main findings of the studies.
Results We identified 34 articles to review, including 29 scientific papers and 5 grey literature documents. The findings of the selected articles consistently indicate a negative association between SES and avoidable mortality rates. Studies have not all used the same definitions of avoidable mortality or SES nor operationalized them in the same way.
Conclusion Our review highlights the absence of a globally standard definition in avoidable mortality health equity research. Additional work to establish a standardized definition is crucial for supporting global comparability.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research was funded in part by the Urban Public Health Network. No other financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
About the UPHN The Urban Public Health Network (UPHN) is a national organization established in 2004 which today includes the Medical Officers of Health in 24 of Canada’s large urban centres. Working collaboratively and with a collective voice, the network addresses public health issues that are common to urban populations. Research operations of the UPHN are conducted in partnership with the University of Saskatchewan.
Disclaimer: This working paper is for discussion and comment purposes. It has not been peer-reviewed nor been subject to review by Research Department staff or executives. Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and not those of the Saskatchewan Health Authority.
Copyright: © 2023 Authors. All rights reserved.
Suggested Citation: Marouzi Anousheh, Plante Charles, Neudorf Corey. 2023. “Application of the Concept “Avoidable Mortality” in Assessing the Socioeconomic Status Related Inequalities in Health: A Scoping Review.” MedRxiv.
Funding Statement: This research was funded in part by the Urban Public Health Network. No other financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Ethics Declaration: Not applicable.
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Data Availability: All data used in this study is public use and can be accessed through university libraries and the Data Liberation Initiative.
Data Availability
All data used in this study is public use and can be accessed through university libraries and the Data Liberation Initiative.
