Abstract
Introduction Connecting end-users to research evidence has the power to improve patient knowledge and inform health decision-making. However, recognized barriers to or determinants of effective knowledge mobilization (KMb) are differences in culture and language among the end users of the evidence. This scoping review set out to understand current processes and practices when creating or adapting KMb products for culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) audiences.
Methods We searched 3 databases (Ovid Medline, CINAHL via EBSCOhost, PsychINFO) from 2011 until August 2021. We included any literature about KMb product creation or adaptation processes serving CALD communities. A primary reviewer screened all identified publications and a second reviewer screened publications excluded by the primary. Data were extracted using a standardized form by one reviewer and 10% were verified by a second reviewer. Studies were categorized by type of adaptation (‘surface’ or ‘deep’ structure) and mapped based on type of stakeholder engagement used (i2S model). A search update was run in July 2023, and screening and extraction are in progress.
Results Seven thousand four hundred and five unique titles and abstracts were reviewed, 319 full-text studies were retrieved and reviewed, and 24 studies were included in final data extraction and mapping. Fifteen studies (63%) created or adapted exclusively text-based KMb products such as leaflets and pamphlets and 9 (38%) produced digital products such as videos (n=4, 16%), mobile applications (n=3, 13%), website (n=1, 4%) and a CD ROM (n=1, 4%). Eight studies (33%) reported following a framework or theory for their creation or adaptation efforts. Only five studies (21%) demonstrated ‘deep structure’ cultural sensitivity and applied all five (Inform, Consult, Involve, Collaborate, and Support) levels of stakeholder engagement. Four (17%) studies included reflections from the research teams on the processes for creating or adapting KMb products for CALD communities.
Conclusion Included studies cited a variety of methods in creating or adapting KMb products for CALD communities. Successful uptake of created or adapted KMb products was often the result of collaboration with end-users for more applicable, accessible and meaningful products. Further research developing guidance and best practices is needed to support the creation or adaptation of KMb products with CALD communities.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work has been supported by funding from the Stollery Childrens Hospital Foundation through the Stollery Science Lab. Dr. Hartling and Dr. Scott are Distinguished Researchers with the Stollery Science Lab supported by the Stollery Childrens Hospital Foundation. Dr. Hartling is supported by a Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Synthesis and Translation. Dr. Scott is supported by a Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Translation in Child Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data is available upon reasonable request to the corresponding Author.
