Abstract
The Perceived Stress Scale-4 (PSS-4) is an ultra-brief self-report measure to assess perceived psychological stress. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the PSS-4 in Colombia. A total of 1911 adult participants with university education completed the PSS-4. Characteristics of the items and the subscales were explored. Dimensionality was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), incorporating an examination of invariance (configural, metric, scalar, and strict) across socio-demographic characteristics. Construct validity (convergent and discriminant), reliability indices, know-groups, and predictive validity were also computed. The CFA showed adequate fit indices for the two-factor model (hopelessness and coping), being invariant across gender, income level, age, and work status. Internal consistency was adequate for the PSS-4 (α = .73, ω = .72, λ2 = .74). Significant positive correlations of the PSS-4 were identified with depression (r = .59) and anxiety (r = .55), as well as significant negative with post-traumatic growth (r = –.37) and resilience (r = –.47). The PSS-4 showed adequate capacity to predict potential depressive and anxiety symptoms, as well as protective factors such as resilience and posttraumatic growth. Higher scores on the PSS-4 were observed among young people, as well as among people with lower incomes and those unemployed. These findings suggest that the PSS-4 can be a reliable and valid tool for assessing psychological stress in Colombians with university education.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by the Agency for Management of University and Research Grants (AGAUR; 2020PANDE00025). Juan P. Sanabria-Mazo has a PFIS predoctoral contract from the Institute of Health Carlos III (ISCIII; FI20/00034). All authors declare no conflict of interest.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This research was approved by the Animal and Human Experimentation Ethics Committee of the Autonomous University of Barcelona (approval code: CEEAH-5197). CEEAH MEMBERSHIP. In accordance with its internal regulations, the current membership of the CEEAH is the following: Mr Ignacio Segovia, adviser on animal welfare. Dr Pedro Jose Otaegui, adviser on animal welfare. Dr Jose Luis Ruiz de la Torre, adviser on animal welfare. Dr Sandra Barbosa Perez, adviser on animal welfare. Dr Vicente Martinez Perea, as a lecturer performing research in Life Sciences or Health Sciences. Ms Nuria Perez, representing the Quality Assurance Unit of the UAB. Dr Sonia Darbra, as a lecturer performing research in Life Sciences or Health Sciences. Dr Jose Luis Molina, as a lecturer in Anthropology performing research in Human Sciences or Social Sciences. Dr Daniel Gamper, as a lecturer in Philosophy with no connections to experimentation in Life Sciences or Health Sciences. Dr. Miquel Torregrossa, as a lecturer performing research in Life Sciences or Health Sciences. Mr. Agusti Verde, como UAB Data Protection Officer Dra. Marta Martin Flix, as a lecturer performing research in Life Sciences or Health Sciences Dra. Ainhoa Flecha Fernandez Sanmamed, as a lecturer in sociologist performing research in Human Sciences or Social Sciences.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced are available online at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21701231
