ABSTRACT
Introduction Disrupted sleep is common in individuals with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and may be a marker for AD risk. The timing of sleep or chronotype affects sleep-wake activity and is also associated with AD, but little is known about links between sleep and chronotype in older adults. In this study, we tested if different measures of sleep and chronotype are associated among older adults even after adjusting for multiple potentially confounding variables.
Methods Participants (N=243) with a mean age of 74 underwent standardized cognitive assessments, measurement of CSF AD biomarkers, and sleep monitoring via single-channel EEG, actigraphy, and self-reported sleep logs. Chronotype was defined as the midpoint of sleep measured by actigraphy.
Results Later mid-point of sleep (i.e., late chronotype) was associated with African American race and greater night-to-night variability in the sleep mid-point. After controlling for age, race, sex, cognitive status, AD biomarkers, and sleep disorders, a later mid-point of sleep was associated with longer rapid eye movement (REM) onset latency, decreased REM sleep time, lower sleep efficiency, increased sleep onset latency, and more awakenings at night. Late chronotype was also associated with increased <2 Hz non-REM slow-wave activity.
Conclusions To identify individuals at risk for cognitive impairment before symptoms onset, non-invasive in vivo markers of brain function, such as sleep, are needed to track both future risk of cognitive impairment and response to interventions. Chronotype is a potential modifiable AD risk factor and should also be taken into account when using sleep as a marker for AD risk.
Competing Interest Statement
Scott Sauers: No conflicts. Cristina D. Toedebusch: No conflicts. Rachel Richardson: No conflicts. Adam P. Spira: Received payment for serving as a consultant for Merck, received honoraria from Springer Nature Switzerland AG for guest editing special issues of Current Sleep Medicine Reports, and is a paid consultant to Sequoia Neurovitality. John C. Morris: Receives research funding from NIH (P30 AG066444; P01AG003991; P01AG026276; U19 AG024904). Neither Dr. Morris nor his family owns stock or has equity interest (outside of mutual funds or other externally directed accounts) in any pharmaceutical or biotechnology company. David M. Holtzman: Co-founded and is on the scientific advisory board of C2N Diagnostics. D.M.H. is on the scientific advisory board of Denali, Genentech, and Cajal Neuroscience and consults for Asteroid. Brendan P. Lucey: Receives research funding and consulting fees from Eisai; receives consulting fees and serves on a Data Safety and Monitoring Board for Eli Lilly; serves on the Scientific Advisory Board for Beacon Biosignals; receives consulting fees from OrbiMed and GLG Consulting; receives drug/matched placebo from Merck for a clinical trial funded by a private foundation.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Institute on Aging (NIH/NIA) grant P01 AG03991.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the Washington University in St. Louis Institutional Review Board.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes