Abstract
Background Traditional research on total knee arthroplasty (TKA) relies on preoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to predict postoperative satisfaction. We aim to identify distinct patient phenotypes among TKA candidates, and investigate their correlations with patient characteristics.
Methods Between 2017-2021, 389 patients with 450 primary knee cases at a metropolitan public hospital were enrolled in a clinical quality registry. Demographics, clinical data, and the Veterans Rand 12 (VR-12) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) were collected. Imputed data were utilised for the primary analysis, employing k-means clustering to identify four phenotypes. ANOVA assessed differences in scores between clusters, and nominal logistic regression determined relationships between phenotypes and patient age, sex, body mass index, and laterality.
Results The sample comprised 389 patients with 450 primary knees. Phenotype 4 (Mild symptoms with good mental health) exhibited superior physical function and overall health. In contrast, patients in phenotype 2 (Severe symptoms with poor mental health) experienced the most knee pain and health issues. Phenotype 1 (Moderate symptoms with good mental health) reported high mental health scores despite knee pain and physical impairment. Patient characteristics significantly correlated with phenotypes; those in the Severe symptoms with poor mental health phenotype were more likely to be younger, female, have a higher BMI, and bilateral osteoarthritis (P<0.05).
Conclusions This multidimensional analysis identified TKA patient phenotypes based on common PROMs, revealing associations with patient demographics. This approach has the potential to inform prognostic models, enhancing clinical decision-making and patient outcomes in joint replacement.
Significance and Innovations This study leverages the power of machine learning to simultaneously analyse multiple patient-reported outcome measures, which is not utilised in traditional research in total knee arthroplasty
Four distinct phenotypes were identified, and they demonstrated significant associations with patient demographics
This method has potential for developing prognostic models in joint replacement, with the ability to improve clinical decision-making and patient outcomes.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors employed by EBM Analytics have been contracted by the QEII Jubilee Hospital Orthopaedics Department for the purposes of data custodianship of a clinical outcomes registry, and assistance with running and documentation of this study. No other authors have any conflicts to disclose.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the QEII Jubilee Hospital Orthopaedic Research Fund. EBM Analytics was contracted by the senior authors to assist with planning and execution of this study, including data analysis and manuscript preparation.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Human Research Ethics Committee of Metro South Health gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Analysis has been revised and reorganised based on reviewer feedback. Supplemental files updated. Results tables and figures replaced to reflect analysis outputs.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
