Abstract
(1) Background: Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are performed with titanium-nitride-oxide-coated stents (TiNOS) or drug-eluting stents (DES). This prospective systematic literature review (SLR) of prospective, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) showed TiNOS is non-inferior to DES in major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rates and presents a lower risk of recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) at 1-year follow-up. (2) Methods: The previously described SLR and meta-analysis protocol, per PRISMA, Cochrane methods, and GRADE, applied here to 5-year follow-up outcomes. (3) Results: Three RCTs were eligible, comprising 1,620 patients with TiNOS vs. 1,123 with DES. The pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals were: MACE 0.82 [0.68, 0.99], MI 0.58 [0.44, 0.78], cardiac death (CD) 0.46 [0.28, 0.76], ischemia-driven target lesion re-vascularization (TLR) 1.03 [0.79, 1.33], probable or definite stent thrombosis (ST) 0.32 [0.21, 0.59], and all-cause mortality (TD) 0.84 [0.63, 1.12]. Evidence certainty was high in MACE, CD, MI, and ST. Certainty was moderate in TLR and TD. (4) Conclusions: TiNOS in ACS at 5-year follow-up appears safer than DES and equally efficacious. Stratified pooled outcomes by clinical presentation would facilitate clinical validity benchmarking and generalization to target populations.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=90622
Funding Statement
No external funding. Labor covered by the reasercher academic salary.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos