ABSTRACT
Importance Acute Hepatic Porphyria (AHP) is a group of rare but treatable conditions associated with diagnostic delays of fifteen years on average. The advent of electronic health records (EHR) data and machine learning (ML) may improve the timely recognition of rare diseases like AHP. However, prediction models can be difficult to train given the limited case numbers, unstructured EHR data, and selection biases intrinsic to healthcare delivery.
Objective To train and characterize models for identifying patients with AHP.
Design, Setting, and Participants This diagnostic study used structured and notes-based EHR data from two centers at the University of California, UCSF (2012-2022) and UCLA (2019-2022). The data were split into two cohorts (referral, diagnosis) and used to develop models that predict: 1) who will be referred for testing of acute porphyria, amongst those who presented with abdominal pain (a cardinal symptom of AHP), and 2) who will test positive, amongst those referred. The referral cohort consisted of 747 patients referred for testing and 99,849 contemporaneous patients who were not. The diagnosis cohort consisted of 72 confirmed AHP cases and 347 patients who tested negative. Cases were female predominant and 6-75 years old at the time of diagnosis.
Candidate models used a range of architectures. Feature selection was semi-automated and incorporated publicly available data from knowledge graphs.
Main Outcomes and Measures F-score on an outcome-stratified test set
Results The best center-specific referral models achieved an F-score of 86-91%. The best diagnosis model achieved an F-score of 92%. To further test our model, we contacted 372 current patients who lack an AHP diagnosis but were predicted by our models as potentially having it (≥ 10% probability of referral, ≥ 50% of testing positive). However, we were only able to recruit 10 of these patients for biochemical testing, all of whom were negative. Nonetheless, post hoc evaluations suggested that these models could identify 71% of cases earlier than their diagnosis date, saving 1.2 years.
Conclusions and Relevance ML can reduce diagnostic delays in AHP and other rare diseases. Robust recruitment strategies and multicenter coordination will be needed to validate these models before they can be deployed.
Question Can machine learning help identify undiagnosed patients with Acute Hepatic Porphyria (AHP), a group of rare diseases?
Findings Using electronic health records (EHR) data from two centers we developed models to predict: 1) who will be referred for AHP testing, and 2) who will test positive. The best models achieved 89-93% accuracy on the test set. These models appeared capable of recognizing 71% of the cases earlier than their true diagnosis date, reducing diagnostic delays by an average of 1.2 years.
Meaning Machine learning models trained using EHR data can help reduce diagnostic delays in rare diseases like AHP.
Competing Interest Statement
VAR receives research support from Alnylam, Takeda, Merck, Genentech, Blueprint Medicines, Stryker, Mitsubishi Tanabe, and Janssen. BW receives research support from Alnylam and Mitsubishi Tanabe, and honoraria for participation in advisory boards from Alnylam, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, and Disc Medicine. RD, JA, SM, NC, and RD are employees of Alnylam Inc. All authors declare that no actual competing interests exist.
Funding Statement
Research reported in this publication was supported by funding from the UCSF Division of Gastroenterology, the UCSF Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, and Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. This publication was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through UCSF-CTSI Grant Number UL1 TR001872, as well as the UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute through grant number UL1TR001881. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the institutional review boards at UCSF (20-31754) and UCLA (21-001260).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* Denotes co-first authorship
Data Availability
The raw data used in this manuscript is available from UCSF and UCLA following the execution of a data use agreement. The analytical code is available at https://github.com/rwelab/AHPPrediction.
