Effects of Specific Protective Resources on the Burnout Levels of Selected Visayan Medical Students from Online-Based Education during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study

Jordan Joy Arpilleda, Julia Patricia Bunal, Margaret Therese Rose Montano, Lesly Marie Torrenueva, Ma. Jobelle Acebes, Margaret Angeli Homecillo, Juan Paolo Salvador, Frances Gabrielle Tan, Zackaree Michael Villanueva
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.28.23294675

ABSTRACT

Background Burnout is a phenomenon characterized as a consistent state of being exhausted physically, mentally, and emotionally. Grit, tolerance for ambiguity, religiosity, and social support are protective factors that may mitigate burnout and improve life satisfaction. This study assessed the association between specific protective resources of students from a medical school in Visayas at all year levels with online-based education-related burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods A total of 234 medical students from a medical school in Visayas during the academic year 2020-2021 were sampled using stratified random sampling technique. Demographics were obtained. Specific protective resources of grit, religiosity, social support and tolerance for ambiguity, and burnout symptoms were measured using validated online questionnaires. Protective associations of specific resources on burnout levels were assessed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Predictive capabilities of resources with statistically significant protective effects were summarized using Receiving Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results All year levels experienced burnout based on Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey (MBI-SS) subscales, with PBL 2 having the highest incidence comprising 33 respondents (49%). Majority of the students experienced moderate burnout on emotional exhaustion (44%) and low burnout on depersonalization (58%), while all of them had high burnout levels on the subscale of personal accomplishment (100%). Most students were moderately gritty (91%) and had high tolerance for ambiguity (98%), overall religiosity index (82%), and social support from significant others (68%); family (68%); and friends (76%). Grit, religiosity and social support had positive significant correlations and reductive effects to burnout. Tolerance for ambiguity did not show any significant relationship with burnout. Grit, religiosity and social support are good predictors of burnout. Grit had good diagnostic accuracy and discrimination. Religiosity and social support were moderately accurate predictors of burnout.

Conclusions Grit, religiosity and social support are significantly protective on burnout levels of medical students from online-based education during the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION

Background of the Study

The World Health Organization (WHO) included burnout in the 11th Revision of the International Classification of Disease (ICD-11) as a phenomenon characterized as a consistent state of being exhausted physically, mentally, and emotionally.1

Factors that may mitigate burnout, affect psychological well-being, and improve life satisfaction include grit defined as the firmness of the mind or spirit and having unyielding courage in the face of hardship or danger.1 A meta-analysis by Kim et al also showed that social support from families and peers has a negative correlation with student burnout making it a protective factor.6 Religiosity and having a strong spiritual belief and background have protective effects against stress and burnout.7,8 Lastly, a low tolerance for ambiguity or uncertainty could be a predictor for burnout as seen in the study done on physicians by Kuhn et al.9

Distress during medical school can lead to burnout with significant consequences especially if it continues to occur during residency and further studies.1 Moreover, there are still no reports associating the effects of specific protective resources on burnout levels of medical students taking virtual classes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, this study was conducted.

Statement of the Problem and Objectives

This study primarily aims to assess the association between specific protective resources of students from a medical school in Visayas in all year levels with online-based education-related burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, this study aims to answer the following objectives:

  1. Identify the socio-demographic profile of the respondents in terms of: Sex, Age, Year level, Civil/Marital Status, and Religion

  2. Determine the level of burnout of the respondents across all year levels in online-based education in terms of: Emotional Exhaustion, Personal accomplishment, and Depersonalization

  3. Determine the extent of specific protective resources of all year levels in terms of: Grit, Tolerance for ambiguity (TFA), Religiosity, and Social Support

  4. Assess if there is a significant relationship between the specific protective resources and the burnout levels of medical students

  5. Assess if grit, tolerance for ambiguity (TFA), religiosity, or social support is predictive of online-based education burnout reduction in medical students

  6. Determine the prognostic utility of the specific protective resources in predicting burnout reduction among the medical students

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study is a descriptive cross-sectional type. Data collection was done through online questionnaires in Google Forms sent via email to enrolled Problem-Based Learning (PBL) medical students at all year levels in a medical school in the Visayas during the Academic Year 2020-2021. Stratified randomized sampling technique was done. The study formulated survey questionnaires consisting of three parts: (1) demographic characteristics such as age, sex, relationship status, religion, and year level; (2) the validated Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey (MBI-SS), which is a gold standard for defining burnout 3; and (3) questionnaires assessing the specific protective resources against burnout including the 5-item Grit scale, Duke University Religion Index (DUREL), Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), and 16-item Tolerance for Ambiguity Scale (TAS). All hypothesis testing was performed using a 0.05 level of significance. All variables that recorded a significant predictor of burnout reduction were subjected to a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis to plot the sensitivity and 1-specificity of the variables towards diagnosing reduction in burnout. The Area Under Curve was obtained to determine its prognostic utility as a specific protective resource to burnout. Multivariate linear regression analysis was done on grit, religiosity, social support, and TFA to assess predictive associations against burnout. All statistical analyses were performed with GNU PSPP Statistical Analysis Software. Statistical significance was set p < 0.05.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Among the 234 respondents, eighty-nine percent (89%) are between 21 to 25 years old. Additionally, PBL 2 comprised the bulk of the sample size (29%) while PBL 1 had the least number of respondents (19%) due to the reduction of enrollment rate. Most of the respondents are females (65%), Roman Catholics (82.05%), and single (74%).

Descriptive statistics for survey instruments are shown in Table 1. Burnout, religiosity, and social support are listed by their respective subscales.

View this table:
Table 1. Summary Of Survey Instrument Results (Mean ± Standard Deviation) At 1 Study Sampling Time (N=234).

Table 2 depicts the levels of burnout in terms of their online classes in the different subscales of MBI-SS across all year levels A.Y. 2020-2021. Majority of the PBL 1 and PBL3 respondents had moderate burnout levels on the emotional exhaustion subscale and low burnout levels on depersonalization. Most of the PBL 2 respondents had high burnout levels on emotional exhaustion but low burnout levels on depersonalization. Most PBL 4 respondents had low burnout scores on both emotional exhaustion and depersonalization. All respondents had high levels on the personal accomplishment subscale. An increased degree of burnout is present if the total values of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization are high and the value of personal accomplishment is low.

View this table:
Table 2. Frequency & Percentage Distribution Of The Level Of Burnout Of All Year Levels

The overall incidence of burnout among selected medical students in all year levels is shown in Figure 1 and illustrates that PBL 2 has the highest incidence of burnout comprising 33 students (49%) while PBL 4 has the least burnout incidence with only 8 students (14%). It can also be inferred that the incidence of burnout decreases as the year level progresses, with the fourth year having the highest incidence of no burnout.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Medical Students Burnout Condition Across All Year Levels. (N=234)

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve Analysis for grit, religiosity, and social support score as predictors of NO BURNOUT in the subscale of emotional exhaustion (above) and depersonalization (below).

In the analysis of specific protective factors, most medical students were shown to be moderately gritty (91%) while the rest are extremely gritty (8%) and not gritty (1%). Moreover, extreme grit was highest among the PBL 2 and PBL 4 students. This means that more gritty students are associated with lower levels of burnout. Most of the medical students are religious in the subscales of ORA and IR with 141 (60%) and 166 (71%) responses, respectively. These suggest that most respondents are involved or attend public religious activities. Additionally, the medical students also have a significant degree of personal religious commitment or motivation. However, most respondents have low scores in the NORA subscale (55%) suggesting no engagement in religious activities performed privately primarily attributed to the hectic schedules and time constraints of a medical student. Students with a high religiosity index had lower levels of psychological distress and burnout making it a protective factor. Majority of the medical students had high tolerance for ambiguity (98%). Tolerance for ambiguity is highest among PBL 2 students and lowest among PBL 1 students. Almost all medical students at all year levels tend to perceive ambiguous situations as desirable and have higher ambiguity tolerance resulting in improved emotional outcomes. In terms of the perceived social support of the respondents, most of the respondents have high social support from family (68%), friends (76%), and significant others (68%). From PBL 1 to 3, friends become increasingly important as a source of social support due to similar experiences and career choices as the respondents. For PBL 4 students, valuing family becomes more heightened because they are more exposed to real-life situations of patient-physician interactions and have developed family-orientedness. Perceived social support was found to significantly improve perceived sense of personal accomplishment hence reducing burnout level.

The ROC curves of grit, religiosity subdivided into ORA, NORA and IR, and social support were shown to be good predictors of burnout levels in the subscale of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization of selected medical students. Grit has good and acceptable diagnostic or prognostic accuracy and value to the presence or absence of the respective forms of burnouts while religiosity was considered moderately accurate predictors of burnout among medical students in all subscales. On the other hand, social support is a very good prognosticating marker of burnout with the highest AUC of 0.85 in the depersonalization subscale but it is not an acceptable prognosticator in the emotional exhaustion component of burnout. The specific protective resources that have significant utility in the management of burnout levels during the COVID-19 pandemic are grit, religiosity, and social support.

CONCLUSION

Of the four protective resources, only grit, religiosity, and social support had a significant positive correlation to burnout while tolerance for ambiguity had no significant correlation to burnout. The three showed that they were good predictors of burnout levels - grit having good diagnostic accuracy and discrimination, while religiosity and social support being moderately accurate predictors of burnout.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Recommendations for Future Studies:

  1. Identify and explore relationships of other psychographic and social-demographic factors and burnout.

  2. Conduct a prospective longitudinal study on medical students to clarify if the origin of the high levels of burnout syndrome are directly related to the progression of studies.

  3. Evaluate and compare different protective resource assessment tools to determine the most appropriate tool for the future researchers in order to obtain the most precise results.

  4. Conduct surveys to medical students in other Cebu medical schools with a different curriculums and determine any significant difference

  5. Conduct surveys to students enrolled in a nonmedical field, and determine any significant difference

  6. Formulate mental health wellness activities tailored to these specific protective resources to help medical students from developing negative coping strategies from burnout.

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Jumat MR, Chow PK, Allen JC, Lai SH, Hwang NC, Iqbal J, et al. Grit protects medical students from burnout: a longitudinal study. BMC Medical Education. 2020 Aug; 20:266
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.
    Baticulon R.E., Sy J.J., Alberto N.R.I., Baron M.B.C., Mabulay R.E.C., Rizada L.G.T., Tiu C.J.S., Clarion C.A., Reyes J.C.B. (2021). Barriers to Online Learning in the Time of COVID-19: A National Survey of Medical Students in the Philippines. Medical Science Educator. doi:10.1007/s40670-021-01231-z
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    Ashton CH, Kamali F. Personality, lifestyles, alcohol and drug consumption in a sample of British medical students. Med. Educ. 1995;29:187–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.
    Arora A, Kannan S, Gowri S, Choudhary S, Sudarasanan S, Khosla PP. Substance abuse amongst the medical graduate students in a developing country. Indian J. Med. Res. 2016;143:101–3. doi:10.4103/0971-5916.178617 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.
    APA : Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Grit. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Retrieved March 15, 2021, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/grit
  6. 6.↵
    Kim B, Jee S, Lee J, An S, Lee SM. Relationships between social support and student burnout: A meta-analytic approach. Stress Health. 2018 Feb;34(1):127–134. doi: 10.1002/smi.2771. Epub 2017 Jun 22. PMID: 28639354.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Wachholtz A, Rogoff M. The relationship between spirituality and burnout among medical students. Journal of Contemporary Medical Education. 2013;1(2):83.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Chiddarwar S, Singh D. Role of Spirituality as a Way of Coping from Burnout in Medical Students of a Tertiary Care Institute In India. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare. 2016;3(20):836–840.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    Kuhn G, Goldberg R, Compton S. Tolerance for uncertainty, burnout, and satisfaction with the career of emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Jul;54(1):106–113.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.12.019. Epub 2009 Feb 7. PMID: 19201058.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.
    Bakker A, Demerouti E. The Job Demands-Resources model: state of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2007;22(3):309–328.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.
    Bakker A, Demerouti E, de Boer E, Schaufeli W. Job demands and job resources as predictors of absence duration and frequency. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2003;62(2):341–356.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  12. 12.
    Bakker A, Demerouti E, Taris T, Schaufeli W, Schreurs P. A multigroup analysis of the job demands-resources model in four home care organizations. International Journal of Stress Management. 2003;10(1):16–38.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.
    de Almeida GC, de Souza HR, de Almeida PC, de Almeida BC, Almeida GH. The prevalence of burnout syndrome in medical students. Rev. Psiquiatr. Clin. 2016;43:6–10. [Google Scholar]
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.
    Dyrbye L, Shanafelt T. A narrative review on burnout experienced by medical students and residents. Med. Educ. 2016;50:132–49. doi:10.1111/medu.12927 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.
    Shanafelt TD, Dyrbye LN, West CP, Sinsky CA. Potential Impact of Burnout on the US Physician Workforce. Mayo Clin. Proc. [Internet]. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research; 2016;91:1667–8. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.08.016 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.
    Maslach C, Jackson S. The measurement of experienced Burnout. J. Occup. Behav. [Internet]. 1981;2:99–113. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/job.4030020205/pdf [Google Scholar]
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.
    ICD-11 for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics (Version : 09/2020 [Internet]. World Health Organization. World Health Organization; [cited 2020Sep22]. Available from: https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en
  18. 18.
    Ishak W, Nikravesh R, Lederer S, Perry R, Ogunyemi D, Bernstein C. Burnout in medical students: a systematic review. Clin Teach. 2013;10(4):242–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.
    Heinen I, Bullinger M, Kocalevent R-D. Perceived stress in first year medical students—associations with personal resources and emotional distress. BMC Med. Educ. [Internet]. 2017;17:4 Available from: http://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-016-0841-810.1186/s12909-016-0841-8 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.
    Santen SA, Holt DB, Kemp JD, Hemphill RR. Burnout in Medical Students: Examining the Prevalence and Associated Factors. South. Med. J. [Internet]. 2010;103:758–63. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2062272410.1097/SMJ.0b013e3181e6d6d4 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.
    Cardoso HF, Nunes Baptista M, Francioni D, De Sousa A, Júnior EG. Síndrome de burnout: Análise da literatura nacional entre 2006 e 2015. Rev. Psicol. Organ. e Trab. 2017;17:121–8. [Google Scholar]
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.
    Elsalem L, Al-Azzam N, Jum’ah A, Obeidat N, Sindiani A, Kheirallah K. Stress and behavioral changes with remote E-exams during the Covid-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study among undergraduates of medical sciences. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2020;60:271–279.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.
    Botelho FFR, Bergamo I, de Oliveira MC, Trevizan FB, Pacca FC, Fucuta P, et al. Stress Level Assessment of Medical School Program and correlations between Learning Styles and Teaching Methodologies. MedEdPublish [Internet]. 2017;6 Available from: http://www.mededpublish.org/manuscripts/824/v1 [Google Scholar]
  24. 24.
    Moffat KJ, McConnachie A, Ross S, Morrison JM. First year medical student stress and coping in a problem-based learning medical curriculum. Med. Educ. 2004. p. 482–91. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2929.2004.01814.x [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.
    Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Huntington JL, Lawson KL, Novotny PJ, Sloan JA, et al. Personal Life Events and Medical Student Burnout: A Multicenter Study. Acad. Med. 2006;81:374–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.
    Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Massie FS, Power DV, Eacker A, Harper W, et al. Burnout and Suicidal Ideation among U.S. Medical Students. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2008;149(5):334.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.
    Dyrbye L, West C, Satele D, Boone S. Burnout Among U.S. Medical Students, Residents, and Early… : Academic Medicine [Internet]. LWW. 2014 [cited 2020Sep25]. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/fulltext/2014/03000/burnout_among_u_smedical_students,_residents,.25.aspx
  28. 28.
    Shadid A; Shadid AM; Shadid A; Almutairi FE; Almotairi KE; Aldarwish T; Alzamil O; Alkholaiwi F; Khan SU; Stress, Burnout, and Associated Risk Factors in Medical Students [Internet]. Cureus. U.S. National Library of Medicine; [cited 2020Sep25]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31966946/
  29. 29.
    Costa EFde O, Santos SA, Santos ATRde A, Melo EVde, Andrade TMde. Burnout Syndrome and associated factors among medical students: a cross-sectional study [Internet]. Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil). Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo; 2012 [cited 2020Sep25]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3370307/?report=classic
  30. 30.
    Caga-anan JM, Camello JF, Campo KL. Red flag up: burnout and academic performance among students of the Cebu Institute of Medicine, SY 2013 -2014 [Internet]. HERDIN Plus. 2013 [cited 2020Sep25]. Available from: http://www.herdin.ph/index.php/component/herdin/?view=research
  31. 31.
    West CP, Dyrbye LN, Erwin PJ, Shanafelt TD Interventions to prevent and reduce physician burnout: a systematic review and meta-analysis [Internet]. Lancet (London, England). U.S. National Library of Medicine; 2016 [cited 2020Sep24]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27692469/
  32. 32.
    Haedike C. Burnout, Self-Awareness, and Self-Care in Psychotherapists [Internet]. UST Research Online. 2015 [cited 2020Sep24]. Available from: https://ir.stthomas.edu/caps_gradpsych_docdiss/22/
  33. 33.
    Balch CM, Shanafelt TD. Combating stress and burnout in surgical practice: a review [Internet]. Thoracic surgery clinics. U.S. National Library of Medicine; 2010 [cited 2020Sep24]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21762865/)
  34. 34.
    Shanafelt TD; Gorringe G; Menaker R; Storz KA; Reeves D; Buskirk SJ; Sloan JA; Swensen SJ; Impact of organizational leadership on physician burnout and satisfaction [Internet]. Mayo Clinic proceedings. U.S. National Library of Medicine; 2015 [cited 2020Sep24]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25796117/
  35. 35.
    Qiao Hu, Wilmar B. Schaufeli, Toon W. Taris. Published 2010 Dec 28. The Job Demands–Resources model: An analysis of additive and joint effects of demands and resources. Journal of Vocational Behavior 79 (2011) 181–190. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2010.12.009
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. 36.
    Demerouti E, Bakker A, Nachreiner F, Schaufeli W,. The Job Demands-Resources Model of Burnout. The Journal of applied psychology 2001 ; 86():499–512
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.
    Faisal Khan, Rosman M.D. Yusoff and Anwar Khan. Job Demands, Burnout and Resources in Teaching a Conceptual Review. World Applied Sciences Journal 30 (1): 20–28, 2014. Published: Feb 3, 2014. DOI: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2014.30.01.21029
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. 38.
    Chirico F. Religious Belief and Mental Health in Lay and Consecrated Italian Teachers [Internet]. Journal of religion and health. U.S. National Library of Medicine; 2017 [cited 2020Sep24]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27179821/
  39. 39.
    See KC;Zhao MY;Nakataki E;Chittawatanarat K;Fang WF;Faruq MO, et al. Professional burnout among physicians and nurses in Asian intensive care units: a multinational survey [Internet]. Intensive care medicine. U.S. National Library of Medicine; 2018 [cited 2020Sep24]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30446797/
  40. 40.
    Thompson G, Halaas G, Hosford CC, McBride RB. Resilience Among Medical Students: The Role of Coping Style and Social Support [Internet]. Teaching and learning in medicine. U.S. National Library of Medicine; 2016 [cited 2020Sep24]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27064719/
  41. 41.
    Velando-Soriano A;Ortega-Campos E;Gómez-Urquiza JL;Ramrez-Baena L;De La Fuente EI;Caadas-De La Fuente GA; A. Impact of social support in preventing burnout syndrome in nurses: A systematic review [Internet]. Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS. U.S. National Library of Medicine; 2020 [cited 2020Sep24]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31617309/
  42. 42.
    Halbesleben, J. R. B. (2006). Sources of social support and burnout: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1134–1145. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1134 (Retraction published 2011, Journal of Applied Psychology, 96[1], 182)
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.
    Duckworth AL, Peterson C, Matthews MD, Kelly DR. Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007;92(6):1087–101
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.
    Duckworth AL, Quinn PD. Development and validation of the short grit scale (grit-s). J Pers Assess. 2009;91(2):166–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.
    Strayhorn TL. What role does grit play in the academic success of black male collegians at predominantly white institutions? J Afr Am Stud. 2014; 18(1):1–10.
    OpenUrl
  46. 46.
    Hancock J, Mattick K. Tolerance of ambiguity and psychological well-being in medical training: A systematic review [Internet]. researchgate.net. 2019 [cited 2020Sep25]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338118262_Tolerance_of_ambiguity_and_psychological_well-being_in_medical_training_A_systematic_review/full text/
  47. 47.
    Coker A. (PDF) Validation Of Maslach Burnout Inventory [Internet]. Validation Of Maslach Burnout Inventory. 2009 [cited 2021Jan21]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267208551_Validation_Of_Maslach_Burnout_Inventory
  48. 48.
    Maslach C. Valid and Reliable Survey Instruments to Measure Burnout, Well-Being, and Other Work-Related Dimensions [Internet]. National Academy of Medicine. 2020 [cited 2021Feb21]. Available from: https://nam.edu/valid-reliable-survey-instruments-measure-burnout-well-workrelated-dimensions/
  49. 49.
    Thorsen VC, Teten AL, Meguid T. High rates of burnout among maternal health staff at a referral hospital in Malawi: A cross-sectional study [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2021Mar2]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51158844_High_rates_of_burnout_among_maternal_health_staff_at_a_referral_hospital_in_Malawi_A_cross-sectional_study.
  50. 50.
    Duckworth A. 12Item Grit Scale [Internet]. https://www1.villanova.edu. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology; 2013 [cited 2021Mar2]. Available from: https://www1.villanova.edu/content/dam/villanova/learningsupport/GRIT%20scale.pdf
  51. 51.
    Gawad A. Religious Activity, Psychotic Features, and Suicidality in… : Journal of Psychiatric Practice® [Internet]. LWW. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. and/or its subsidiaries; 2018 [cited 2021Mar2]. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/practicalpsychiatry/Fulltext/2018/07000/Religious_Act ivity,_Psychotic_Features,_and.5.aspx
  52. 52.
    Zimet G. [Internet]. Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) -Scale Items and Scoring Information. Research Gate; 2016 [cited 2021Mar2]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication
  53. 53.
    IHS for the Ohio Child Welfare Training Program. TOLERANCE OF AMBIGUITY SCALE DEVELOPED BY BUDNER (1962) [Internet]. https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com. Child Welfare Training Program; 2018 [cited 2021Mar2]. Available from: https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/qrstuff/file/20180704/011432/c34413d67bb5d16a/QR+Code+-+Tolerance+for+Ambiguity+Quiz.pdf
  54. 54.
    Queen D, Harding K. Societal pandemic burnout: A COVID legacy. Int Wound J [Internet]. 2020;17(4):873–4. Available from: doi:10.1111/iwj.13441
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  55. 55.
    Maslach C, Leiter MP. Understanding the burnout experience: recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry [Internet]. 2016;15(2):103–11. Available from: doi:10.1002/wps.20311
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.
    López-Núez MI, Rubio-Valdehita S, Diaz-Ramiro EM, Aparicio-Garca ME. Psychological capital, workload, and burnout: What’s new? The impact of personal accomplishment to promote sustainable working conditions. Sustainability [Internet]. 2020;12(19):8124. Available from: https://encyclopedia.pub/3037
    OpenUrl
  57. 57.
    Hill MR, Goicochea S, Merlo LJ. In their own words: stressors facing medical students in the millennial generation. Med Educ Online [Internet]. 2018;23(1):1530558. Available from: doi:10.1080/10872981.2018.1530558
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. 58.
    How hard is the first year of medical school? -Quora [Internet]. Quora.com. [cited 2021 Jun 6]. Available from: https://www.quora.com/How-hard-is-the-first-year-of-medical-school
  59. 59.
    Doolittle BR. Association of burnout with emotional coping strategies, friendship, and institutional support among internal medicine physicians. J Clin Psychol Med Settings [Internet]. 2020; Available from: doi:10.1007/s10880-020-09724-6
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  60. 60.
    Wachholtz A, Rogoff M. The relationship between spirituality and burnout among medical students. J Contemp Med Educ [Internet]. 2013;1(2):83–91. Available from: doi:10.5455/jcme.20130104060612
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  61. 61.
    Ramlee N, Osman A, Salahudin SN, Yeng SK, Ling SC, Safizal M. The influence of religiosity, stress and job attitude towards organizational behavior: Evidence from public universities in Malaysia. Procedia econ finance [Internet]. 2016;35:563–73. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212567116000691
    OpenUrl
  62. 62.
    Hancock J, Mattick K. Tolerance of ambiguity and psychological well-being in medical training: A systematic review. Med Educ [Internet]. 2020;54(2):125–37. Available from: doi:10.1111/medu.14031
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  63. 63.
    Nakhostin-Ansari A, Maghbouli N, Shayestefar M. Ambiguity tolerance among medical students and its relationship with personality and participation in the mentoring program: A cross-sectional study. Ann Med Surg (Lond) [Internet]. 2021;62:425–30. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2049080121000698
    OpenUrl
  64. 64.
    Stewart RC, Umar E, Tomenson B, Creed F. Validation of the multi-dimensional scale of perceived social support (MSPSS) and the relationship between social support, intimate partner violence and antenatal depression in Malawi. BMC Psychiatry [Internet]. 2014;14:180. Available from: doi:10.1186/1471-244X-14-180
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. 65.
    Alsubaie MM, Stain HJ, Webster LAD, Wadman R. The role of sources of social support on depression and quality of life for university students. Int J Adolesc Youth [Internet]. 2019;24(4):484–96. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02673843.2019.1568887
    OpenUrl
  66. 66.
    Running head: RESIDENT ASSISTANT BURNOUT. Investigating the correlation between burnout and spirituality among resident assitants [Internet]. Core.ac.uk. [cited 2021 Jun 6]. Available from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/58821084.pdf
  67. 67.
    Nie Z, Jin Y, He L, Chen Y, Ren X, Yu J, et al. Correlation of burnout with social support in hospital nurses. Int J Clin Exp Med [Internet]. 2015;8(10):19144–9. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2677054
    OpenUrl
Back to top
Posted September 01, 2023.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email
Effects of Specific Protective Resources on the Burnout Levels of Selected Visayan Medical Students from Online-Based Education during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study
Jordan Joy Arpilleda, Julia Patricia Bunal, Margaret Therese Rose Montano, Lesly Marie Torrenueva, Ma. Jobelle Acebes, Margaret Angeli Homecillo, Juan Paolo Salvador, Frances Gabrielle Tan, Zackaree Michael Villanueva
medRxiv 2023.08.28.23294675; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.28.23294675
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area