ABSTRACT
Background The causal relationship between maternal smoking in pregnancy and reduced offspring birth weight is well established and is likely due to impaired placental function. However, observational studies have given conflicting results on the association between smoking and placental weight. We aimed to estimate the causal effect of newly pregnant mothers quitting smoking on their placental weight at the time of delivery.
Methods We used one-sample Mendelian randomization, drawing data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) (up to N = 805) and the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) (up to N = 4475). The analysis was performed in pre-pregnancy smokers only, due to the specific role of the genetic instrument SNP rs1051730 (CHRNA5 – CHRNA3 – CHRNB4) in affecting smoking cessation but not initiation.
Results Fixed effect meta-analysis showed a 175 g [95%CI: 16, 334] higher placental weight for pre-pregnancy smoking mothers who continued smoking at the beginning of pregnancy, compared with those who stopped smoking. Using the number of cigarettes smoked per day in the first trimester as the exposure, the causal estimate was a 12 g [95%CI: 2,22] higher placental weight per cigarette per day. Results were similar when the smoking exposures were measured at the end of pregnancy. Using the residuals of birth weight regressed on placental weight as the outcome, we showed weak evidence of lower offspring birth weight relative to the placental weight for continuing smoking.
Conclusion Our results suggest that continued smoking during pregnancy causes higher placental weights.
Key Messages
It is well known that maternal smoking in pregnancy causes a lower birth weight on average, but the relationship between maternal smoking and placental weight is less clear, with observational studies showing conflicting results.
Our Mendelian randomization study suggests that for pre-pregnancy smokers, continuing smoking during pregnancy causes higher placental weight at term than quitting smoking.
Our study also suggests that a greater number of cigarettes smoked per day during pregnancy causes a larger placental weight at term.
A possible explanation for our findings is that the placenta grows larger in mothers who smoke during pregnancy to compensate for the lower oxygen availability, but further work is needed to confirm and further investigate this hypothesis.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The UK Medical Research Council and Wellcome (Grant ref: 217065/Z/19/Z) and the University of Bristol provide core support for ALSPAC. This publication is the work of the authors and A.J. and R.M.F. will serve as guarantors for the contents of this paper. Genotyping of the ALSPAC maternal samples were funded by the Wellcome Trust (WT088806). Specific funds for recent detailed data collection on the mothers were obtained from the US National Institutes of Health (R01 DK077659) and Wellcome Trust (WT087997MA) for completion of selected items of obstetric data extraction, including placental weights. A comprehensive list of grants funding is available on the ALSPAC website (http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/external/documents/grant-acknowledgements.pdf). A.J. received funding for her PhD studentship from the Faculty of Health and Life Sciences at the University of Exeter P.R.N. was supported by grants from the European Research Council (AdG #293574), Trond Mohn Foundation (Mohn Center for Diabetes Precision Medicine), the Research Council of Norway (#240413), the Western Norway Regional Health Authority (Strategic Fund), the Novo Nordisk Foundation (#NNF54741). K.T.A. gratefully acknowledges the financial support of the EPSRC via grant EP/T017856/1. S.J. was supported by Helse Vest's Open Research Grant (grants #912250 and F-12144), the Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF20OC0063872) and the Research Council of Norway (grant #315599). M.V. acknowledges the support of the Research Council of Norway (project #301178) R.M.F. is supported by a Wellcome Senior Research Fellowship (WT220390). This project utilised high-performance computing funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Research Infrastructure Initiative (award number MR/M008924/1). This study was supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Exeter Biomedical Research Centre. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. This research was funded in part, by the Wellcome Trust (Grant number: WT220390). For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The establishment of MoBa and initial data collection was based on a licence from the Norwegian Data Protection Agency and approval from The Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics. The MoBa cohort is currently regulated by the Norwegian Health Registry Act. The current study was approved by the Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics (no. 2012/67). Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the ALSPAC Ethics and Law Committee and the Local Research Ethics Committees. Informed consent for the use of data collected via questionnaires and clinics was obtained from participants following the recommendations of the ALSPAC Ethics and Law Committee at the time.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All information on data availability is decribed in detail in the manuscript
Data Availability
The data in ALSPAC is fully available, via managed systems, to any researchers. The managed system is a requirement of the study funders, but access is not restricted on the basis of overlap with other applications to use the data or on the basis of peer review of the proposed science.
The ALSPAC data management plan describes in detail the policy regarding data sharing, which is through a system of managed open access. The following steps highlight how to apply for access to the data included in this paper and all other ALSPAC data. (1) Please read the ALSPAC access policy, which describes the process of accessing the data and samples in detail and outlines the costs associated with doing so. (2) You may also find it useful to browse the fully searchable ALSPAC research proposals database, which lists all research projects that have been approved since April 2011. (3) Please submit your research proposal for consideration by the ALSPAC Executive Committee. You will receive a response within 10 working days to advise you whether your proposal has been approved. If you have any questions about accessing data, please email alspac-data@bristol.ac.uk.
Data from the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study and the Medical Birth Registry of Norway used in this study are managed by the national health register holders in Norway (Norwegian Institute of public health) and can be made available to researchers, provided approval from the Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics (REC), compliance with the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and approval from the data owners. The consent given by the participants does not open for storage of data on an individual level in repositories or journals. Researchers who want access to data sets for replication should apply through helsedata.no. Access to data sets requires approval from The Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics in Norway and an agreement with MoBa.
