Abstract
Background Loneliness is a serious public health problem and became even more visible during the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet it is unknown which aspects of social networks are most important. Here, we evaluated social network structure and function and associations with moderate and severe social and emotional loneliness in older adults.
Methods This cross-sectional study includes online questionnaire data (SaNAE cohort, August-November 2020), in independently living Dutch adults aged 40 years and older. For the separate outcomes social and emotional loneliness, associations with structural network aspects (e.g., network diversity - having various types of relationships, and density - having network members who know each other), and functional network aspects (informational, emotional, and practical social support) were assessed and risk estimates were adjusted for the number of contacts, age, educational level, level of urbanization and chronic conditions. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were stratified by sex.
Results Of 3,396 participants (55% men; mean age 65 years), 18% were socially lonely which was associated with a less diverse and less dense network, living alone, feeling less connected to friends, not having a club membership, and fewer emotional supporters (men only) or informational supporters (women only). 28% were emotionally lonely, which was associated with being socially lonely, and more exclusively online (versus in-person) contacts (men only), and fewer emotional supporters (women only).
Conclusion Network structure and function beyond the mere number of contacts is key in loneliness, and in particular, the types of relationships are important. Public health strategies should be sex-tailored and promote network diversity and density, club membership, informational and emotional support, and in-person contact.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of the University of Maastricht (METC 2018-0698, 2019-1035, and 2020-2266).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
