Abstract
Aims Limited recent data exist on prescribing patterns and patient characteristics for glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), an important drug class for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and/or overweight or obesity. We describe trends in first-time prescribing of GLP-1 RAs.
Materials and Methods Using aggregated US electronic health record data, we identified first-time prescriptions of GLP-1 RAs between January 2018 and June 2023 for adults receiving regular care. We describe prescribing volumes stratified by patient characteristics, specific drug, and FDA-labelled indication. The 5.5-year analysis period was divided into six-month periods.
Results In total, 274,562 patients were newly prescribed a GLP-1 RA, with a significant increase over time (January to June, 2018: 9,642 versus 2023: 66,569; p < 0.001). Overall, 181,860 (66.2%) patients had T2D and 229,715 (83.7%) had obesity or overweight. The proportion with T2D decreased over time (January through June, 2018: 84.1% versus 2023: 49%; p < 0.001), while the proportion with overweight or obesity increased (January through June, 2018: 75.9% versus 2023: 90.7%; p <.001). Of prescriptions with a known FDA-labelled indication (74.2%), 87% were labelled for T2D and 13% were labelled for overweight or obesity. Patients first prescribed a GLP-1 RA labelled for T2D were 59.1% female with a mean (SD) age of 58.6 (13) years, while those prescribed a GLP-1 RA labelled for overweight or obesity were 82.9% female, with a mean (SD) age of 48.2 (12.2) years.
Conclusions We observed an increase in first-time prescribing of GLP-1 RAs overall, and a shift away from a predominately T2D population.
Competing Interest Statement
PJR, SG, BMGC, RB, and NLS authors are employees of Truveta, Incorporated.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Normalized electronic health record data are de-identified by expert determination under the HIPAA Privacy Rule before being made available to researchers. In accordance with 46.101 Protection of Human Subjects, our study did not require Institutional Review Board approval because it used only deidentified medical records.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
* nicholass{at}truveta.com
