Abstract
There is a growing desire to use social data to support local evidence-based health planning and decision-making. However, the geographic boundaries which social data are disseminated for do not usually align exactly with boundaries used by local health organizations. In this paper, we propose a method we call “pseudo-geography” to estimate counts for locally-defined geographic boundaries using data on smaller spatial units. We compared six different pseudo-geography methods, using data in Saskatoon, and identified the most accurate one, which incorporates the area-weighted spatial join technique. We further found that the pseudo-geography method can be refined by eliminating the areas with few or no residents before carrying out any spatial joins. We expect this method to be more accurate in larger cities and when the ratio of the locally-defined area to the smaller spatial units gets larger.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by Urban Public Health Network.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study used (or will use) ONLY openly available human data that were originally located at: 1. Statistics Canada Census profile: https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/dp-pd/prof/details/download-telecharger/comp/page_dl-tc.cfm?Lang=E 2. City of Saskatoon neighbourhood data, which are publicly available on the City of Saskatoon Neighbourhood Profiles report (2019): chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.saskatoon.ca/sites/default/files/documents/community-services/planning-development/research/neighbourhood-profiles/neighbourhood_profiles_2019.pdf
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
3 Suggested Citation: Marouzi A., Plante C., Neudorf C. 2023. “Pseudo-neighbourhoods: Approximating the social characteristics of Saskatoon’s locally-defined neighbourhoods using Statistics Canada’s Census Profiles” Urban Public Health Network Research Working Paper Series.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
