ABSTRACT
Purpose Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and functional connectivity (FC) have been used to follow aging in both children and older adults. Robust changes have been observed in children, where high connectivity among all brain regions changes to a more modular structure with maturation. In this work, we examine changes in FC in older adults after two years of aging in the UK Biobank longitudinal cohort.
Approach We process data using the Power264 atlas, then test whether FC changes in the 2,722-subject longitudinal cohort are statistically significant using a Bonferroni-corrected t-test. We also compare the ability of Power264 and UKB-provided, ICA-based FC to determine which of a longitudinal scan pair is older.
Results We find a 6.8% average increase in SMT-VIS connectivity from younger to older scan (from ρ = 0.39 to ρ = 0.42) that occurs in male, female, older subject (> 65 years old), and younger subject (< 55 years old) groups. Among all inter-network connections, this average SMT-VIS connectivity is the best predictor of relative scan age, accurately predicting which scan is older 57% of the time. Using the full FC and a training set of 2,000 subjects, one is able to predict which scan is older 82.5% of the time using either the full Power264 FC or the UKB-provided ICA-based FC.
Conclusions We conclude that SMT-VIS connectivity increases in the longitudinal cohort, while resting state FC increases generally with age in the cross-sectional cohort. However, we consider the possibility of a change in resting state scanner task between UKB longitudinal data acquisitions.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors would like to acknowledge the NIH (grants R01 GM109068, R01 MH104680, R01 MH107354, P20 GM103472, R01 EB020407, R01 EB006841, R56 MH124925) and NSF (grant #1539067) for partial funding support.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study used (or will use) ONLY openly available human data that were originally located at: UK Biobank (available to authorized researchers) at https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/ ADNI data available to authorized researchers at https://adni.loni.usc.edu/ PNC data available through application to the database of genotypes and phenotypes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Manuscript now includes analysis of PNC dataset demonstrating change in functional connectivity (FC) with change in scanner task (Section 3.5). The manuscript also moves data about overall increase in FC with aging into the main body of the paper (Section 3.4). The abstract is slightly revised.
