Abstract
Knowledge on immunogenicity of the bivalent Omicron BA.4/5 vaccine in dialysis patients and the effect of a previous infection is limited. Therefore, vaccine-induced humoral and cellular immunity was analyzed in dialysis patients and immunocompetent controls with and without prior infection.
In an observational study, 33 dialysis patients and 58 controls matched for age, sex and prior infection status were recruited. Specific IgG, neutralizing antibody activity and cellular immunity towards the spike-antigen from parental SARS-CoV-2 and Omicron subvariants BA.1, BA.2 and BA.4/5 were analyzed before and 13-18 days after vaccination.
The bivalent vaccine led to a significant induction of IgG, neutralizing titers, and specific CD4 and CD8 T-cell levels. Neutralizing activity towards the parental strain was highest, whereas specific T-cell levels towards parental spike and Omicron subvariants did not differ indicating substantial cross-reactivity. Dialysis patients with prior infection had significantly higher spike-specific CD4 T-cell levels with lower CTLA-4 expression compared to infection-naïve patients. When compared to controls, no differences were observed between individuals without prior infection. Among infected individuals, CD4 T-cell levels were higher in dialysis patients and neutralizing antibodies were higher in controls. Vaccination was overall well tolerated in both dialysis patients and controls with significantly less adverse events among dialysis patients.
In conclusion, our study did not provide any evidence for impaired immunogenicity of the bivalent Omicron BA.4/5 vaccine in dialysis patients. Unlike in controls, previous infection of patients was even associated with higher levels of spike-specific CD4 T cells, which may reflect prolonged encounter with antigen during infection.
Translational statement Dialysis patients with uremic immunodeficiency are at increased risk for infectious complications after SARS-CoV-2 infection and have been shown to insufficiently respond towards the first doses of COVID-19 vaccines. Bivalent vaccines are now recommended, although knowledge on immunogenicity and on the effect of a previous infection is limited in this patient group. We show that the bivalent BA.4/5 vaccine was well tolerated and led to a pronounced induction of antibodies, neutralizing antibodies and T cells, which was overall similar in magnitude in non-infected patients and controls. Despite some differences between patients and controls with prior infection, our data do not provide any evidence towards impaired immunity in dialysis patients.
Competing Interest Statement
M.S. has received grant support from Astellas and Biotest to the organization Saarland University outside the submitted work, and honoraria for lectures from Biotest, Takeda, Qiagen, MSD, and served in advisory boards for Moderna, Biotest, MSD and Takeda. T.S. and A.A.-O. have received travel support from Biotest. All other authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Funding Statement
Financial support was provided in part by the State chancellery of the Saarland to M.S. Moreover, the work was in part supported by the cluster project ENABLE, the Innovation Center TheraNova, and the LOEWE Priority Program CoroPan funded by the Hessian Ministry for Science and the Arts (HMWK) to M.W.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by ethics committee of the Arztekammer des Saarlandes (reference 76/20 including amendment), and written consent was obtained from all individuals.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data availability
All figures and tables have associated raw data. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
