Abstract
Despite demonstrated facility for arithmetic and other quantitative tasks, the performance of ChatGPT and other large language models for clinical risk calculation have yet to be assessed. Using synthetic patient data, this preliminary study aimed to assess the calibration, reproducibility, and potential for sociodemographic bias of ChatGPT-derived Pooled Cohort Equation (PCE) scores of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk as compared to true scores. We found that ChatGPT-derived PCE scores, despite being moderately associated with the true PCE scores, displayed poor calibration with respect to true PCE scores, and exhibited instability between repeated rounds of prompting, suggesting lack of reproducibility. Moreover, ChatGPT-derived PCE scores also appeared inappropriately sensitive to contextual indicators of the sociodemographic status of the synthetic patients in this study. Further work is needed to confirm these results, and to assess performance on a wider variety of prompts as well as in other settings beyond cardiovascular disease prevention where accurate risk calculation is also vital to appropriate clinical decision-making.
Figure. Underestimation of true PCE risk estimates (x-axis) by ChatGPT (y-axis) on synthetic patient data.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any direct funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data produced in the present study are available upon request.
