ABSTRACT
This study investigates how well the air- and bone-conduction auditory steady-state response detects mild conductive hearing loss compared to the auditory brainstem response in young infants. Air-bone gap sizes are compared between infants with normal hearing and conductive loss using a two-group cross-sectional design. Twenty-three (500 Hz) and 22 (2000 Hz) infants (0-6 months of age) with normal hearing and 15 (500 Hz) infants with conductive loss were recruited from newborn hearing screening. Thresholds were obtained to frequency-specific air- and bone-conducted stimuli. There were no instances of conductive loss at 2000 Hz. 500 Hz mean thresholds and air-bone gap sizes were compared. Sensitivity and specificity for identifying conductive loss were measured. Overall, mean bone-conduction thresholds were similar between groups, and mean 500-Hz air conduction thresholds were higher with larger air-bone gap size for infants with conductive loss. Sensitivity and specificity for identifying conductive loss was highest for air-conduction auditory brainstem response threshold measurement compared to screening and auditory steady-state response threshold measurements. Compared to the auditory brainstem response, the variability of auditory steady-state response thresholds and air-bone gap size was too great to reliably separate normal hearing from mild conductive loss. More research is needed using infants with varying degrees of hearing loss at multiple frequencies to fully assess the appropriateness of the auditory steady-state response as a clinical diagnostic tool for an infant population.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by a Discovery Grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to Dr. Susan Small.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee of the University of British Columbia and the University of Saskatchewan gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
This research was supported by a Discovery Grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to Dr. Susan Small. Ethics approval for this project was obtained from the University of British Columbia’s Clinical Research Ethics Board (certificate # H13-02445) and the University of Saskatchewan’s Biomedical Research Ethics Board (certificate # 13-319).
Preliminary findings were presented in 2015 at Biennial Symposium of the International Evoked Response Audiometry Study Group IERASG: Valeriote, H., & Small, S. A. (2015). Comparison of air- and bone-conduction auditory brainstem and multiple 80-Hz auditory steady-state responses in infants with normal hearing and conductive hearing loss. Abstracts of the XXIV Biennial Symposium of the International Evoked Response Audiometry Study Group IERASG (May 10–14; Busan, Korea). Retrieved April 4, 2015, from http://www.ierasg 2015.org
Minor edits to address reviewers' comments.
Data Availability
Data is not available.
