Abstract
The genetic basis of severe COVID-19 has been thoroughly studied and many genetic risk factors shared between populations have been identified. However, reduced sample sizes from non-European groups have limited the discovery of population-specific common risk loci. In this second study nested in the SCOURGE consortium, we have conducted the largest GWAS meta-analysis for COVID-19 hospitalization in admixed Americans, comprising a total of 4,702 hospitalized cases recruited by SCOURGE and other seven participating studies in the COVID-19 Host Genetic Initiative. We identified four genome-wide significant associations, two of which constitute novel loci and first discovered in Latin-American populations (BAZ2B and DDIAS). A trans-ethnic meta-analysis revealed another novel cross-population risk locus in CREBBP. Finally, we assessed the performance of a cross-ancestry polygenic risk score in the SCOURGE admixed American cohort.
Introduction
To date more than 50 loci associated to COVID-19 susceptibility, hospitalization, and severity have been identified using genome-wide association studies (GWAS)1,2. The COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative (HGI) has made significant efforts4 to augment the power to identify disease loci by recruiting individuals from diverse populations and conducting a trans-ancestry meta-analysis. Despite this, the lack of genetic diversity and a focus on cases of European ancestries still predominate in the studies5,6. Besides, while trans-ancestry meta-analyses are a powerful approach for discovering shared genetic risk variants with similar effects across populations7, they may fail to identify risk variants that have larger effects on particular underrepresented populations. Genetic disease risk has been shaped by the particular evolutionary history of populations and the environmental exposures8. Their action is particularly important for infectious diseases due to the selective constrains that are imposed by the host-pathogen interactions9,10. Literature examples of such population specificities in COVID-19 severity includes a DOCK2 gene variant in East Asians11, and frequent loss of function variants in IFNAR1 and IFNAR2 genes in Polynesian and Inuit populations, respectively12,13.
Including diverse populations in case-control GWAS studies with unrelated participants usually require a prior classification of individuals in genetically homogeneous groups, which are typically analysed separately to control the population stratification effects14. Populations with recent admixture impose an additional challenge to the GWAS due to their complex genetic diversity and linkage disequilibrium (LD) patterns, requiring the development of alternative approaches and a careful inspection of results to reduce the false positives due to population structure8. In fact, there are benefits in study power from modelling the admixed ancestries either locally, at regional scale in the chromosomes, or globally, across the genome, depending on factors such as the heterogeneity of the risk variant in frequencies or the effects among the ancestry strata15. Despite the development of novel methods specifically tailored for the analysis of admixed populations16, the lack of a standardized analysis framework and the difficulties to confidently cluster the admixed individuals into particular genetic groups often leads to their exclusion from GWAS.
The Spanish Coalition to Unlock Research on Host Genetics on COVID-19 (SCOURGE) recruited COVID-19 patients between March and December 2020 from hospitals across Spain and from March 2020 to July 2021 in Latin-America (https://www.scourge-covid.org). A first GWAS of COVID-19 severity among Spanish patients of European descent revealed novel disease loci and explored age and sex varying effects of the genetic factors17. Here we present the findings of a GWAS meta-analysis in admixed American (AMR) populations, comprising individuals from the SCOURGE Latin-American cohort and the HGI studies, which allowed to identify two novel severe COVID-19 loci, BAZ2B and DDIAS. Further analyses modelling the admixture from three genetic ancestral components and performing a trans-ethnic meta-analysis led to the identification of an additional risk locus near CREBBP. We finally assessed a cross-ancestry polygenic risk score model with variants associated with critical COVID-19.
Results
Meta-analysis of COVID-19 hospitalization in admixed Americans
Study cohorts
Within the SCOURGE consortium, we included 1,608 hospitalized cases and 1,887 controls (not hospitalized COVID-19 patients) from Latin-American countries and from recruitments of individuals of Latin-American descend conducted in Spain (Supplementary Table 1). Quality control details and estimation of global genetic inferred ancestry (GIA) (supplementary Figure 1) are described in Methods, whereas clinical and demographic characteristics of patients included in the analysis are shown in Table 1. Summary statistics from the SCOURGE cohort were obtained under a logistic mixed model with the SAIGE model (Methods). Another seven studies participating in the COVID-19 HGI consortium were included in the meta-analysis of COVID-19 hospitalization in admixed Americans (Figure 1).
GWAS meta-analysis
We performed a fixed-effects GWAS meta-analysis using the inverse of the variance as weights for the overlapping markers. The combined GWAS sample size consisted of 4,702 admixed AMR hospitalized cases and 68,573 controls.
This GWAS meta-analysis revealed genome-wide significant associations at four risk loci, two of which (BAZ2B and DDIAS) were novel and considered specific to the populations included in this study (Table 2, Figure 2). Variants of these loci were prioritized by positional and expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) mapping with FUMA, identifying four lead variants linked to other 310 variants and 31 genes (Supplementary Tables 2-4). A gene-based association test revealed a significant association in BAZ2B and in previously known risk loci: LZTFL1, XCR1, FYCO1, CCR9, and IFNAR2 (Supplementary Table 5).
A) Manhattan plot for the admixed AMR GWAS meta-analysis. Probability thresholds at p=5×10-8 and p=5×10-5 are indicated by the horizontal lines. Genome-wide significant associations with COVID-19 hospitalizations were found in chromosome 2 (within BAZ2B), chromosome 3 (within LZTFL1), chromosome 6 (within FOXP4), and chromosome 11 (within DDIAS). A Quantile-Quantile plot is shown in supplementary Figure 2. B) Regional association plots for rs1003835 at chromosome 2 and rs77599934 at chromosome 11; C) Allele frequency distribution across The 1000 Genomes Project populations for the lead variants rs1003835 and rs77599934.
Located within the gene BAZ2B, rs13003835 is an intronic variant associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 hospitalization (Odds Ratio [OR]=1.20, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]=1.12-1.27, p=3.66×10-8). This association was not previously reported in any GWAS of COVID-19 published to date. According to gnomAD v3.1.2, the T allele at rs13003835 has a frequency of 43% in admixed AMR groups while allele frequency (AF) is lower in the EUR populations (16%) and in the global sample (29%). Local ancestry inference (LAI) reported by gnomAD shows that within the Native-American component, the risk allele T is the major allele, whereas it is the minor allele within the AFR and EUR LAI components. The T allele frequency in the SCOURGE Latin-American controls is consistent with gnomAD (Table 2). Interestingly, rs13003835 did not reach a significant association (p=0.972) in the COVID-19 HGI trans-ancestry meta-analysis including the five population groups1. Based on our mapping strategy (see Methods), PLA2R1, LY75, WDSUB1, and CD302 were other prioritized genes in this locus.
The other novel risk locus is led by rs77599934, an intronic rare variant located in chromosome 11 within DDIAS and associated with risk of COVID-19 hospitalization (OR=2.27, 95%CI=1.70-3.04, p=2.26×10-8). PRCP gene was an additional prioritized gene at this locus. rs77599934 showed an AF of 1.1% for the G allele in the non-hospitalized controls (Table 2), in line with the recorded gnomAD AF of 1% in admixed AMR groups (0.02% in EUR populations and 2.6% in the global sample). Examining the LAI, the G allele occurs at 1.1% frequency in the AFR component while it is almost absent in the Native-American and EUR. This variant was not included in the COVID-19 HGI B2 trans-ancestry meta-analysis nor in the GWAS summary statistics for the EUR populations.
We observed a suggestive association with rs2601183 in chromosome 15, which is located between ZNF774 and IQGAP1 (allele G OR=1.20, 95%CI=1.12-1.29, p=6.11×10- 8, see Supplementary Table 2) and has not yet been reported. This sentinel variant is in perfect LD (r2=1) with rs601183, an eQTL of ZNF774 in the lung.
The GWAS meta-analysis pinpointed two variants at known loci, LZTFL1 and FOXP4. The SNP rs35731912 was previously associated with COVID-19 severity in EUR populations18, and it was mapped to LZTFL1. As for rs2477820, while it is a novel risk variant within gene FOXP4, it has a moderate LD (r2=0.295) with rs2496644, which has been linked to COVID-19 hospitalization19. This is consistent with the effects of LD in tag-SNPs when conducting GWAS in diverse populations.
Functional mapping of novel risk variants
Bayesian fine mapping
We performed different approaches to narrow down the prioritized loci to a set of most probable genes driving the associations. First, we computed credible sets at the 95% confidence for causal variants and annotated them with VEP and the V2G aggregate scoring (Supplementary Table 6, Supplementary Figure 3). The 95% confidence credible set from the region of chromosome 2 around rs13003835 included 76 variants. However, the approach was unable to converge allocating variants in a 95% confidence credible set for the region in chromosome 11.
Colocalization of eQTLs
To determine if the novel genetic risk loci were associated with gene expression in relevant tissues (whole blood, lung, lymphocytes, and oesophagus mucosa), we computed the posterior probabilities of colocalization for overlapping variants allocated to the 95% confidence credible set. We used the GTEx v8 tissues as the main expression dataset, although it is important to consider that the eQTL associations were carried out mainly on individuals of EUR ancestries. To confirm the colocalization in other ancestries, we performed secondary analyses on three expression datasets computed on admixed AMR, leveraging data from individuals with high African GIA, high Native-American ancestry, and from a pooled cohort (Methods). Results are shown in the supplementary Table 7.
Five genes (LY75, BAZ2B, CD302, WDSUB1, and PLA2R1) were the candidates for eQTL colocalization in the associated region in chromosome 2. However, LY75 emerged as the most likely causal gene for this locus since the colocalization in whole blood was supported with a posterior probability for H4 (PPH4) of 0.941 and with robust results (supplementary Figure 4). Moreover, this also allowed to prioritize rs12692550 as the most probable causal variant for both traits at this locus with a PP_SNP_H4 of 0.74. Colocalization with gene expression data from admixed AMR validated this finding. LY75 also had evidence of colocalization in lung (PPH4=0.887) and the esophagus mucosa (PPH4=0.758). However, we could not prioritize a single causal variant in these two other tissues and sensitivity analyses revealed a weak support.
CD302 and BAZ2B were the second and third most likely genes that could drive the association, respectively, according to the colocalization evidence. CD302 was the most probable according to the high AFR genetic ancestries dataset (supplementary Figure 5).
Despite the chromosome 11 region failing to colocalize with gene expression associations for any of the tissues, the lead variant rs77599934 is in moderate-to-strong LD (r2=0.776) with rs60606421, which is an eQTL associated to a reduced expression of DDIAS in the lung (supplementary Figure 6). The highest PPH4 for DDIAS was in the high AFR genetic ancestry expression dataset (0.71).
Transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS)
Five novel genes, namely SLC25A37, SMARCC1, CAMP, TYW3, and S100A12 (supplementary Table 8) were found significantly associated in the cross-tissue TWAS. To our knowledge, these genes have not been reported previously in any COVID-19 TWAS or GWAS analyses published to date. In the single tissue analyses, ATP5O and CXCR6 were significantly associated in lung, CCR9 was significantly associated in whole blood, and IFNAR2 and SLC25A37 were associated in lymphocytes.
Likewise, we carried out the TWAS analyses using the models trained in the admixed populations. However, no significant gene-pairs were detected. The 50 genes with the lowest p-values are shown in the supplementary Table 9.
Sensitivity analyses for population specificity of associated loci
We carried out two cross-ancestry inverse variance-weighted fixed-effects meta-analyses with the admixed AMR GWAS meta-analysis results to evaluate whether the discovered risk loci were specific to admixed AMR groups. In doing so, we also identified novel cross-population COVID-19 hospitalization risk loci.
First, we combined the SCOURGE Latin American GWAS results with the HGI B2 ALL analysis (supplementary Table 10). We refer to this analysis as the SC-HGIALL meta-analysis. Out of the 40 genome-wide significant loci associated with COVID-19 hospitalization in the last HGI release1, this study replicated 39 and the association was stronger than in the original study in 29 of those (supplementary Table 11). However, the variant rs13003835 located in BAZ2B was not associated with COVID-19 hospitalization (OR=1.00, 95%CI=0.98-1.03, p=0.644). The direction of the effect was opposite between AMR and the AFR, EUR, and EAS populations. Results for the variant rs77599934 (in DDIAS) could not be evaluated in the meta-analysis as it was absent from the HGI B2 ALL results.
In this cross-ancestry meta-analysis, we replicated two associations that were not found in HGIv7 albeit they were sentinel variants in the latest GenOMICC meta-analysis2. We found an association at the CASC20 locus led by the variant rs2876034 (OR=0.95, 95%CI=0.93-0.97, p=2.83×10-8). This variant is in strong LD with the sentinel variant of that study (rs2326788, r2=0.92), which was associated with critical COVID-192. Besides, this meta-analysis identified the variant rs66833742 near ZBTB7A associated with COVID-19 hospitalization (OR=0.94, 95%CI=0.92-0.96, p=2.50×10-8). Notably, rs66833742 or its perfect proxy rs67602344 (r2=1) are also associated with upregulation of ZBTB7A in whole blood and in esophagus mucosa. This variant was previously associated with COVID-19 hospitalization2.
In a second analysis, we also explored the associations across the defined admixed AMR, EUR, and AFR ancestral sources by combining through meta-analysis the SCOURGE Latin American GWAS results with the HGI studies in EUR, AFR, and admixed AMR, and excluding those from EAS and SAS (Supplementary Table 12). We refer to this as the SC-HGI3POP meta-analysis. The association at rs13003835 (BAZ2B, OR=1.01, 95%CI=0.98-1.03, p=0.605) was not replicated and rs77599934 near DDIAS could not be assessed, but the association at the ZBTB7A locus was confirmed (rs66833742, OR=0.94, 95%CI=0.92-0.96, p=1.89×10-8). The variant rs76564172 located near CREBBP also reached statistical significance (OR=1.31, 95% CI=1.25-1.38, p=9.64×10- 9). The sentinel variant of the region linked to CREBBP (in the trans-ancestry meta-analysis) was also subjected to the same Bayesian fine mapping procedure (supplementary Table 6) and colocalization with eQTLs under the GTEx v8 MASHR models in lung, esophagus mucosa, whole blood, and transformed lymphocytes. Eight variants were included in the credible set for the region in chromosome 16 (meta-analysis SC-HGI3POP), although CREBBP did not colocalize in any of the tissues.
Finally, we evaluated the weight of AMR and AFR GIA proportions in the novel associations found at chromosomes 2 and 11 in the AMR GWAS meta-analysis. For that, the SCOURGE Latin American participants were classified into four groups depending on the AFR/AMR GIA by quantiles 1 and 3 (see Methods). The four groups tested were: large AFR GIA (>19%, Nctrls=622, Ncases=256); low AFR GIA (<2.8%, Nctrls=298, Ncases=580); large AMR GIA (>56%, Nctrls=166, Ncases=712); and low AMR GIA (<18%, Nctrls=651, Ncases=227). The variant rs13003835 at chromosome 2 was not significantly associated in any of the four groups. Contrarily, the rs77599934 at chromosome 11 was significantly associated among the individuals with larger AFR GIA (OR=3.33, 95%CI=1.70-6.52, p=5.00×10-4).
Polygenic risk score models
Using the 49 variants associated with disease severity that are shared across populations according to the HGIv7, we constructed a polygenic risk score (PGS) model to assess its generalizability in the admixed AMR (Supplementary Table 13). First, we calculated the PGS for the SCOURGE Latin Americans and explored the association with COVID-19 hospitalization under a logistic regression model. The PGS model was associated with a 1.48-fold increase in COVID-19 hospitalization risk per every PGS standard deviation. It also contributed to explain a slightly larger variance (R2=1.07%) than the baseline model.
Subsequently, we divided the individuals into PGS deciles and percentiles to assess their risk stratification. The median percentile among controls was 40, while in cases it was 63. Those in the top PGS decile exhibited a 5.90-fold (95% CI=3.29-10.60, p=2.79×10-9) greater risk compared to individuals in the lowest decile, whereas the effects for the rest of the comparisons were much milder.
We also examined the distribution of PGS scores across a 5-level severity scale to further determine if there was any correspondence between clinical severity and genetic risk. Median PGS scores were lower in the asymptomatic and mild groups, whereas higher median scores were observed in the moderate, severe, and critical patients (Figure 3). We fitted a multinomial model using the asymptomatic class as reference and calculated the OR for each category (Supplementary Table 13), observing that the disease genetic risk was similar among asymptomatic, mild, and moderate patients. Given that the PGS was built with variants associated with critical disease and/or hospitalization and that the categories severe and critical correspond to hospitalized patients, these results underscore the ability of cross-ancestry PGS for risk stratification even in an admixed population.
(A) Polygenic risk stratified by PGS deciles comparing each risk group against the lowest risk group (OR-95% CI); (B) Distribution of the PGS scores in each of the severity scale classes (0-Asymptomatic, 1-Mild disease, 2-Moderate disease, 3-Severe disease, 4-Critical disease).
Finally, to explore whether the risk variants that we deemed to be specific to the admixed AMR population enhanced the prediction of COVID-19 hospitalization, we incorporated the novel lead SNPs from our meta-analysis (rs13003835, rs2477820, and rs77599934) into the PGS model. Their inclusion in the model contributed to explain a larger variance (R2=1.74%) than the model without them. This result, however, should be taken with caution given the risk of overfitting due to the use of the same subjects both for the derivation and testing of the variants.
DISCUSSION
We have conducted the largest GWAS meta-analysis of COVID-19 hospitalization in admixed AMR to date. While the genetic risk basis discovered for COVID-19 is largely shared among populations, trans-ancestry meta-analyses on this disease have primarily included EUR samples. This dominance of studies in Europeans, and the subsequent bias in sample sizes, have the potential to mask population-specific genetic risks. We have found two risk loci adjacent to DDIAS and BAZ2B, first discovered in Latin-American populations and not yet detected in other population groups. Interestingly, the sentinel variant rs77599934 in the DDIAS gene is a rare coding variant (∼1% for allele G) that has not been analysed on the cross-ancestry meta-analysis completed so far. Its absence in EUR-centric GWAS meta-analyses likely results from its low allele frequency on that group (G allele is 0.02% in EUR).
Fine mapping of the region harbouring DDIAS did not reveal further information about which gene could be the more prone to be causal, or about the functional consequences of the risk variant. However, DDIAS, known as damage-induced apoptosis suppressor gene, is itself a plausible candidate gene, as the activity has been linked to DNA damage repair mechanisms. Depletion of DDIAS leads to an increase of ATM phosphorylation and the formation of p53-binding protein (53BP1) foci, a known biomarker of DNA double-strand breaks, indicating its potential role in double-strand break repair20. Similarly, knocking down DDIAS results in elevated levels of phosphorylated nuclear histone 2AXγ, further emphasizing its role in DNA damage21. Interestingly, SARS-CoV-2 infection also triggers ATM kinase phosphorylation and the accumulation of DNA damage by inhibiting repair mechanisms22. This same study reported the activation of the pro-inflammatory pathway p38/MAPK by the virus, a response prompted as well by knocking-down DDIAS21. This gene has been found to interact with STAT3, regulating IL-623 and thus mediating inflammatory processes. While it has been primarily associated with cancer, particularly lung cancer24, our findings suggest that DDIAS gene may be indeed involved in viral response and inflammation through DNA damage repair. The sentinel variant was in strong LD with an eQTL that reduced gene expression of DDIAS in lung. Thus, one hypothesis could be that reduced expression of DDIAS could potentially facilitate SARS-CoV-2 infection. Exploration of the group with higher relative AFR GIA suggests that this association was partly driven by the AFR genetic admixture. This result aligns with the fact that this variant is nearly absent from the AMR and EUR components as reported by GnomAD LAI allele frequencies. Another prioritized gene from this region was PRCP, an angiotensinase that has been linked to hypertension and for which a hypothesis on its role on COVID-19 progression has been raised25,26.
The risk region found in chromosome 2 prioritized more than one gene. The lead variant rs13003835 is located within BAZ2B. BAZ2B encodes one of the regulatory subunits of the Imitation switch (ISWI) chromatin remodelers27 constituting the BRF-1/BRF-5 complexes with SMARCA1 and SMARCA5, respectively, and the association signal colocalized with eQTLs in whole blood. The gene LY75 (encoding the lymphocyte antigen 75) also colocalized with eQTLs in whole blood, esophagus mucosa, and lung tissues. Lymphocyte antigen 75 is involved in immune processes through antigen presentation in dendritic cells and endocytosis28, and has been associated with inflammatory diseases, representing also a compelling candidate for the region. Increased expression of LY75 has been detected within hours after the infection by SARS-CoV-229,30. This variant was not associated within any of the extreme-GIA groups. Yet, local ancestry AF from gnomAD v3.1.2 reported a 1.51 times higher frequency of the risk allele (T) in the AMR component. Lastly, the signal of CD302 colocalized in individuals with high AFR ancestral admixture in whole blood. This gene is located in the vicinity of LY75 and both conform the readthrough LY75-CD302.
A third novel risk region was observed in chromosome 15, between the genes IQGAP1 and ZNF774, although not reaching genome-wide significance.
Secondary analyses revealed five TWAS associated genes, some of which have been already linked to severe COVID-19. In a comprehensive multi-tissue gene expression profiling study31, decreased expression of CAMP and S100A8/S100A9 genes in COVID-19 severe patients was observed, while another study detected the upregulation of SCL25A37 among severe COVID-19 patients32. SMARCC1 is a subunit of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodelling complex that has been identified as pro-viral for SARS-CoV-2 and other coronavirus strains through a genome-wide screen33. This complex is crucial for ACE2 expression and the viral entry in the cell34.
To confirm the specificity to the admixed AMR populations of these novel risk variants for COVID-19 hospitalization, we performed two cross-ancestry meta-analyses including the SCOURGE Latin-American cohort GWAS findings. We found that the two novel risk variants did not associate with COVID-19 hospitalization outside the population-specific meta-analysis, supporting a potential ancestry-specific role of these genes on COVID-19 severity and highlighting the importance of complementing trans-ancestry meta-analyses with group-specific analyses. Notably, this analysis did not replicate the association at the DSTYK locus, which was associated with severe COVID-19 in Brazilian individuals with higher European admixture35. This lack of replication supports the initial hypothesis of that study suggesting that the risk haplotype derived from European populations, as we have reduced the weight of this ancestral contribution in our study by excluding those individuals.
Moreover, these cross-ancestry meta-analyses pointed to three loci that were not genome-wide significant in the HGI v7 ALL meta-analysis: a novel locus at CREBBP, and two loci at ZBTB7A and CASC20 that were reported in another meta-analysis. CREBBP and ZBTB7A achieved a stronger significance when considering only EUR, AFR, and admixed AMR GIA groups. According to a recent study, elevated levels of the ZBTB7A gene promote a quasi-homeostatic state between coronaviruses and host cells, preventing cell death by regulating oxidative stress pathways36. This gene is involved in several signalling pathways, such as B and T cell differentiation37. On a separate note, CREBBP encodes the CREB binding protein (CBP), involved in transcription activation, that is known to positively regulate the type I interferon response through virus-induced phosphorylation of IRF-338. Besides, the CREBP/CBP interaction has been implicated in SARS-CoV-2 infection39 via the cAMP/PKA pathway. In fact, cells with suppressed CREBBP gene expression exhibit reduced replication of the so called Delta and Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants39.
The cross-ancestry PGS model effectively stratified individuals based on their genetic risk and demonstrated consistency with the clinical severity classification of the patients. The inclusion of the population-specific variants in the PGS model slightly improved the predictive value of the PGS. However, it is important to confirm this last finding in an external admixed AMR cohort to address potential overfitting arising from using the same individuals both for the discovery of the associations and for testing the model.
This study is subject to limitations, mostly concerning the sample recruitment and composition. The SCOURGE Latino-American sample size is small and the GWAS is underpowered. Another limitation is the difference in case-control recruitment across sampling regions that, yet controlled for, may reduce the ability to observe significant associations driven by different compositions of the populations. In this sense, the identified risk loci might not replicate in a cohort lacking any of the parental population sources from the three-way admixture. Likewise, we could not explicitly control for socio-environmental factors that could have affected COVID-19 spread and hospitalization rates, although genetic principal components are known to capture non-genetic factors. Finally, we must acknowledge the lack of a replication cohort. We have used all the available GWAS data for COVID-19 hospitalization in admixed AMR in this meta-analysis due to the low number of studies conducted. Therefore, we had no studies to replicate or validate the results. These concerns may be addressed in the future by including more AMR GWAS studies in the meta-analysis, both by involving diverse populations in study designs and by supporting research from countries in Latin-America.
This study provides novel insights into the genetic basis of COVID-19 severity, emphasizing the importance of considering host genetic factors through using non-European populations, especially of admixed sources. Such complementary efforts can pin down variants with population-specific effects and increase our knowledge on the host genetic factors of severe COVID-19.
Materials and methods
GWAS in Latin Americans from SCOURGE
The SCOURGE Latin American cohort
A total of 3,729 of COVID-19 positive cases were recruited across five countries from Latin America (Mexico, Brazil, Colombia, Paraguay, and Ecuador) by 13 participating centres (supplementary Table 1) from March 2020 to July 2021. In addition, we included 1,082 COVID-19 positive individuals recruited between March and December 2020 in Spain who either had evidence of origin from a Latin American country or showed inferred genetic admixture between AMR, EUR, and AFR (with < 0.05% SAS/EAS). These individuals were excluded from a previous SCOURGE study that focused on participants with European genetic ancestries17. We used hospitalization as a proxy for disease severity and defined as cases those COVID-19 positive patients that underwent hospitalization as a consequence of the infection and used as controls those that did not need hospitalization due to COVID-19.
Samples and data were collected with informed consent after the approval of the Ethics and Scientific Committees from the participating centres and by the Galician Ethics Committee Ref 2020/197. Recruitment of patients from IMSS (in Mexico, City), was approved by of the National Comitte of Clinical Research, from Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico (protocol R-2020-785-082).
Samples and data were processed following normalized procedures. The REDCap electronic data capture tool40,41, hosted at Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER) from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), was used to collect and manage demographic, epidemiological, and clinical variables. Subjects were diagnosed for COVID-19 based on quantitative PCR tests (79.3%), or according to clinical (2.2%) or laboratory procedures (antibody tests: 16.3%; other microbiological tests: 2.2%).
SNP array genotyping
Genomic DNA was obtained from peripheral blood and isolated using the Chemagic DNA Blood 100 kit (PerkinElmer Chemagen Technologies GmbH), following the manufacturer’s recommendations.
Samples were genotyped with the Axiom Spain Biobank Array (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturer’s instructions in the Santiago de Compostela Node of the National Genotyping Center (CeGen-ISCIII; http://www.usc.es/cegen). This array contains probes for genotyping a total of 757,836 SNPs. Clustering and genotype calling were performed using the Axiom Analysis Suite v4.0.3.3 software.
Quality control steps and variant imputation
A quality control (QC) procedure using PLINK 1.942 was applied to both samples and the genotyped SNPs. We excluded variants with a minor allele frequency (MAF) <1%, a call rate <98%, and markers strongly deviating from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium expectations (p<1×10-6) with mid-p adjustment. We also explored the excess of heterozygosity to discard potential cross-sample contaminations. Samples missing >2% of the variants were filtered out. Subsequently, we kept the autosomal SNPs and removed high LD regions and conducted LD-pruning (windows of 1,000 SNPs, with step size of 80 and r2 threshold of 0.1) to assess kinship and estimate the global ancestral proportions.
Kinship was evaluated based on IBD values, removing one individual from each pair with PI_HAT>0.25 that showed a Z0, Z1, and Z2 coherent pattern (according to the theoretical expected values for each relatedness level). Genetic principal components (PCs) were calculated with PLINK with the subset of LD pruned variants.
Genotypes were imputed with the TOPMed version r2 reference panel (GRCh38) using the TOPMed Imputation Server and variants with Rsq<0.3 or with MAF<1% were filtered out. A total of 4,348 individuals and 10,671,028 genetic variants were included in the analyses.
Genetic admixture estimation
Global genetic inferred ancestry (GIA), referred to the genetic similarity to the used reference individuals, was estimated with the ADMIXTURE43 v1.3 software following a two-step procedure. First, we randomly sampled 79 European (EUR) and 79 African (AFR) samples from The 1000 Genomes Project (1KGP)44 and merged them with the 79 Native American (AMR) samples from Mao et al.45 keeping the biallelic SNPs. LD-pruned variants were selected from this merge using the same parameters as in the QC. We then run an unsupervised analysis with K=3 to redefine and homogenize the clusters and to compose a refined reference for the analyses, by applying a threshold of ≥95% of belonging to a particular cluster. As a result of this, 20 AFR, 18 EUR, and 38 AMR individuals were removed. The same LD-pruned variants data from the remaining individuals were merged with the SCOURGE Latin American cohort to perform a supervised clustering and estimated admixture proportions. A total of 471 samples from the SCOURGE cohort with >80% estimated European GIA were removed to reduce the weight of the European ancestral component, leaving a total of 3,512 admixed American (AMR) subjects for downstream analyses.
Association analysis
Results for the SCOURGE Latin Americans GWAS were obtained testing for COVID-19 hospitalization as a surrogate of severity. To accommodate the continuum of GIA in the cohort, we opted for a joint testing of all the individuals as a single study using a mixed regression model, as this approach has demonstrated a greater power and to sufficiently control population structure46. The SCOURGE cohort consisted of 3,512 COVID-19 positive patients: cases (n=1,625) were defined as hospitalized COVID-19 patients and controls (n=1,887) as non-hospitalized COVID-19 positive patients.
Logistic mixed regression models were fitted using the SAIGEgds47 package in R, which implements the two-step mixed SAIGE48 model methodology and the SPA test. Baseline covariables included sex, age, and the first 10 PCs. To account for a potential heterogeneity in the recruitment and hospitalization criteria across the participating countries, we adjusted the models by groups of the recruitment areas classified in six categories: Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Paraguay, and Spain. This dataset has not been used in any previously GWAS of COVID-19 published to date.
Meta-analysis of Latin-American populations
The results of the SCOURGE Latin American cohort were meta-analyzed with the AMR HGI-B2 data, conforming our primary analysis. Summary results from the HGI freeze 7 B2 analysis corresponding to the admixed AMR population were obtained from the public repository (April 8, 2022: https://www.covid19hg.org/results/r7/), summing up 3,077 cases and 66,686 controls from seven contributing studies. We selected the B2 phenotype definition because it offered more power and the presence of population controls not ascertained for COVID-19 does not have a drastic impact in the association results.
The meta-analysis was performed using an inverse-variance weighting method in METAL49. Average allele frequency was calculated and variants with low imputation quality (Rsq<0.3) were filtered out, leaving 10,121,172 variants for meta-analysis.
Heterogeneity between studies was evaluated with the Cochran’s-Q test. The inflation of results was assessed based on a genomic control (lambda).
Definition of the genetic risk loci and putative functional impact
Definition of lead variant and novel loci
To define the lead variants in the loci that were genome-wide significant, an LD-clumping was performed on the meta-analysis data using a threshold p-value<5×10-8, clump distance=1500 kb, independence set at a threshold r2=0.1 and used the SCOURGE cohort genotype data as LD reference panel. Independent loci were deemed as a novel finding if they met the following criteria: 1) p-value<5×10-8 in the meta-analysis and p-value>5×10-8 in the HGI B2 ALL meta-analysis or in the HGI B2 AMR and AFR and EUR analyses when considered individually; 2) Cochran’s Q-test for heterogeneity of effects is <0.05/Nloci, where Nloci is the number of independent variants with p<5×10-8; and 3) the nearest gene has not been previously described in the latest HGIv7 update.
Annotation and initial mapping
Functional annotation was done with FUMA50 for those variants with a p-value<5×10-8 or in moderate-to-strong LD (r2>0.6) with the lead variants, where the LD was calculated from the 1KGP AMR panel. Genetic risk loci were defined by collapsing LD-blocks within 250 kb. Then, genes, scaled CADD v1.4 scores, and RegulomeDB v1.1 scores were annotated for the resulting variants with ANNOVAR in FUMA50. Gene-based analysis was also performed using MAGMA51 as implemented in FUMA, under the SNP-wide mean model using the 1KGP AMR reference panel. Significance was set at a threshold p<2.66×10-6 (which assumes that variants can be mapped to a total of 18,817 genes).
FUMA allowed us to perform an initial gene mapping by two approaches: (1) positional mapping, which assigns variants to genes by physical distance using 10-kb windows; and (2) eQTL mapping based on GTEx v.8 data from whole blood, lung, lymphocytes, and oesophagus mucosa tissues, establishing a False Discovery Rate (FDR) of 0.05 to declare significance for variant-gene pairs.
Subsequently, to assign the variants to the most likely gene driving the association, we refined the candidate genes by fine mapping the discovered regions and implementing functional mapping.
To conduct a Bayesian fine mapping, credible sets for the genetic loci considered novel findings were calculated on the results from each of the three meta-analyses to identify a subset of variants most likely containing the causal variant at 95% confidence level, assuming that there is a single causal variant and that it has been tested. We used corrcoverage (https://cran.rstudio.com/web/packages/corrcoverage/index.html) for R to calculate the posterior probabilities of the variant being causal for all variants with an r2>0.1 with the leading SNP and within 1 Mb except for the novel variant in chromosome 19, for which we used a window of 0.5 Mb. Variants were added to the credible set until the sum of the posterior probabilities was ≥0.95. VEP (https://www.ensembl.org/info/docs/tools/vep/index.html) and the V2G aggregate scoring from Open Targets Genetics (https://genetics.opentargets.org) were used to annotate the biological function of the variants contained in the fine-mapped credible sets
Colocalization analysis
We also conducted colocalization analyses to identify the putative causal genes that could act through the regulation of gene expression. FUMA’s eQTL mapping enabled the identification of genes whose expression was associated with the variants in whole blood, lung, lymphocytes, and oesophagus mucosa tissues. We combined this information with the VEP and V2G aggregate scoring to prioritize genes. For the fine-mapping regions, we included the variants within the calculated credible sets. In the cases where the fine mapping was unsuccessful, we considered variants within a 0.2 Mb window of the lead variant.
For each prioritized gene, we then run COLOC52 to assess the evidence of colocalization between association signals and the eQTLs in each tissue, when at least one variant overlapped between them. COLOC estimates the posterior probability of two traits sharing the same causal variant in a locus. Prior probabilities of a variant being associated to COVID-19 phenotype (p1) and gene expression (p2) were set at 1×10-4, while pp2 was set at 1×10-6 as they are robust thresholds53. A posterior probability of colocalization (PP4) > 0.75 and a ratio PP4/PP3>3 were used as the criteria to support evidence of colocalization. Additionally, a threshold of PP4.SNP >0.5 was chosen for causal variant prioritization. In cases were colocalization of a single variant failed, we computed the 95% credible sets. The eQTL data was retrieved from GTEx v8 and only significant variant-gene pairs were considered in the analyses.
Colocalization in whole-blood was also performed using the recent published gene expression datasets derived from a cohort of African Americans, Puerto Ricans, and Mexican Americans (GALA II-SAGE)54. We used the results from the pooled cohort for the three discovered loci, and from the AFRHp5 (African genetic ancestry>50%) and IAMHp5 (Native American genetic ancestry>50%) cohorts for the risk loci in chromosomes 2 and 11. Results are shown in the Supplementary Table 10.
Sensitivity plots are shown in supplementary Figures 4 and 5.
Transcription-wide association studies
Transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) were conducted using the pretrained prediction models with MASHR-computed effect sizes on GTEx v8 datasets55,56. Results from the Latin-American meta-analysis were harmonized and integrated with the prediction models through S-PrediXcan57 for lung, whole blood, lymphocytes and oesophagus mucosa tissues. Statistical significance was set at p-value<0.05 divided by the number of genes that were tested for each tissue. Subsequently, we leveraged results for all 49 tissues and run a multi-tissue TWAS to improve power for association, as demonstrated recently58. TWAS was also conducted with the MASHR models for whole-blood in the pooled admixed AMR from the GALA and SAGE studies54.
Assessment of population specificity of associated loci
We conducted two additional meta-analyses as a sensitivity analysis to determine the population specificity of the discovered risk loci. This methodology enabled the comparison of effects and the significance of associations in the novel risk loci between the results from analyses that included or excluded other population groups.
The first meta-analysis comprised the five populations analysed within HGI (B2-ALL). Additionally, to evaluate the three GIA components within the SCOURGE Latin-American cohort59, we conducted a meta-analysis of the admixed AMR, EUR, and AFR cohorts (B2). All summary statistics were retrieved from the HGI repository. We applied the same meta-analysis methodology and filters as in the admixed AMR meta-analysis. Novel variants from these meta-analyses were fine-mapped and colocalized with gene expression.
The effect of GIA was studied to determine whether any of the estimated genetic ancestry components interact with the associations at these loci. Individuals in the SCOURGE Latin American cohort were classified into large (% GIAi > 3rd quartile of the distribution) and small GIA (% GIAi < 1st quartile of the distribution). Quantiles 1 and 3 for the AFR component were 2.8% and 19%, and for the AMR component were 18% and 56%. Within each group, we tested the association of the two sentinel variants in chromosomes 2 and 11 (accounting for baseline covariables).
Trans-ethnic Polygenic Risk Score
A polygenic risk score (PGS) for critical COVID-19 was derived combining the variants associated with hospitalization or disease severity that have been discovered to date. We curated a list of lead variants that were: 1) associated to either severe disease or hospitalization in the latest HGIv7 release1 (using the hospitalization weights); or 2) associated to severe disease in the latest GenOMICC meta-analysis2 that were not reported in the latest HGI release. A total of 49 markers were used in the PGS model (see supplementary Table 13) since two variants were absent from our study.
Scores were calculated and normalized for the SCOURGE Latin-American cohort with PLINK 1.9. This cross-ancestry PGS was used as a predictor for hospitalization (COVID-19 positive that were hospitalized vs. COVID-19 positive that did not necessitate hospital admission) by fitting a logistic regression model. Prediction accuracy for the PGS was assessed by performing 500 bootstrap resamples of the increase in the pseudo-R-squared. We also divided the sample in deciles and percentiles to assess risk stratification. The models were fit for the dependent variable adjusting for sex, age, the first 10 PCs, and the sampling region (in the Admixed AMR cohort) with and without the PGS, and the partial pseudo-R2 was computed and averaged among the resamples.
A clinical severity scale was used in a multinomial regression model to further evaluate the power of this cross-ancestry PGS for risk stratification. This severity strata were defined as follows: 0) asymptomatic; 1) mild, that is, with symptoms, but without pulmonary infiltrates or need of oxygen therapy; 2) moderate, that is, with pulmonary infiltrates affecting <50% of the lungs or need of supplemental oxygen therapy; 3) severe disease, that is with hospital admission and PaO2<65 mmHg or SaO2<90%, PaO2/FiO2<300, SaO2/FiO2<440, dyspnea, respiratory frequency≥22 bpm, and infiltrates affecting >50% of the lungs; and 4) critical disease, that is with an admission to the ICU or need of mechanical ventilation (invasive or non-invasive). We also included the admixed AMR-specific risk variants as predictors alongside the PRS to determine if they provided increased prediction ability.
Funding
Instituto de Salud Carlos III (COV20_00622 to A.C., COV20/00792 to M.B., COV20_00181 to C.A., COV20_1144 to M.A.J.S. and A.F.R., PI20/00876 to C.F.); European Union (ERDF) ‘A way of making Europe’. Fundación Amancio Ortega, Banco de Santander (to A.C.), Estrella de Levante S.A. and Colabora Mujer Association (to E.G.-N.) and Obra Social La Caixa (to R.B.); Agencia Estatal de Investigación (RTC-2017-6471-1 to C.F.), Cabildo Insular de Tenerife (CGIEU0000219140 ‘Apuestas científicas del ITER para colaborar en la lucha contra la COVID-19’ to C.F.) and Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (PIFIISC20/57 to C.F.).
SD-DA was supported by a Xunta de Galicia predoctoral fellowship.
Author contributions
Study design: RC, AC, CF. Data collection: SCOURGE cohort group. Data analysis: SD-DA, RC, ADL, CF, JML-S. Interpretation: SD-DA, RC, ADL. Drafting of the manuscript: SD-DA, RC, ADL, CF, AR-M, AC. Critical revision of the manuscript: SD-DA, RC, ADL, AC, CF, JAR, AR-M, PL. Approval of the final version of the publication: all co-authors.
Supplementary Material for: Novel risk loci for COVID-19 hospitalization among admixed American populations
Supplementary Tables are provided in a separate excel file
Supplementary figures
European (EUR), African (AFR) and Native American (AMR) GIA was derived with ADMIXTURE from a reference panel composed of Aymaran, Mayan, Nahuan, and Quechuan individuals of Native-American genetic ancestry and randomly selected samples from the EUR and AFR 1KGP populations. The colours represent the different geographical sampling regions from which the admixed American individuals from SCOURGE were recruited.
Coloured in red, the variants allocated to the credible set at the 95% confidence according to the Bayesian fine mapping. In blue, the sentinel variant.
The range of p12 values (probability that a SNP is associated with both traits) for which the rule H4>0.7 is supported is shown in green in the right plots for each analysis. Plots in the left represent the variants included in the risk region common to both traits along their individual association -log10(p-values) for each trait, whereas the shading shows the posterior probability that the SNP is causal given H4 is true. Trait 1 corresponds to COVID-19 hospitalization, while trait 2 corresponds to gene expression in each analysis.
AFRhp5 corresponds to the expression dataset computed in individuals with high African ancestries; AMRhp5 corresponds to the expression dataset computed individuals with high AMR ancestries; pooled corresponds to the dataset computed with the total of individuals from the study. In the right, the plots show in green the range of p12 values (probability that a SNP is associated with both traits) for which the rule H4>0.7 is supported. Plots in the left represent the variants included in the risk region common to both traits along their individual association -log10(p-values) for each trait, whereas the shading shows the posterior probability that the SNP is causal given H4 is true. Trait 1 corresponds to COVID-19 hospitalization, while trait 2 corresponds to gene expression.
Gene-tissue pairs for which either rs1003835 or rs60606421 are significant eQTLs at FDR<0.05 (data retrieved from https://gtexportal.org/home/snp/). rs1003835 (chromosome 2) maps to BAZ2B, LY75, and PLA2R genes. As for the lead variant of chromosome 11, rs77599934, since it was not an eQTL, we used an LD proxy variant (rs60606421). DDIAS and PRCP genes map closely to this variant. NES and p-values correspond to the normalized effect size (and direction) of eQTL-gene associations and the p-value for the tissue, respectively.
Acknowledgements
The contribution of the Centro National de Genotipado (CEGEN), and Centro de Supercomputación de Galicia (CESGA) for funding this project by providing supercomputing infrastructures, is also acknowledged. Authors are also particularly grateful for the supply of material and the collaboration of patients, health professionals from participating centers and biobanks. Namely Biobanc-Mur, and biobancs of the Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Hospital La Fe, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda—Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Puerta de Hierro—Segovia de Arana, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, IDIBGI, IdISBa, IIS Biocruces Bizkaia, IIS Galicia Sur. Also biobanks of the Sistema de Salud de Aragón, Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía, and Banco Nacional de ADN.
Footnotes
References
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
9
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos